切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 19 -21. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.01.008

所属专题： 文献；

论著

联合两种微创术式治疗直肠癌的临床疗效研究
梁磊1,†(), 刘远廷1, 贾纯亮1, 姚远1, 康恺1, 张磊1, 李翰嵩1   
  1. 1. 063000　河北省唐山市人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-30 出版日期:2019-02-26
  • 通信作者: 梁磊

Clinical study of combined minimally invasive surgical treatments for rectal cancer

Lei Liang1,†(), Yuanting Liu1, Chunliang Jia1, Yuan Yao1, Kai Kang1, Lei Zhang1, Hansong Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tangshan people’s hospital, HeBei, 063000 China
  • Received:2018-06-30 Published:2019-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Lei Liang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liang Lei, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

梁磊, 刘远廷, 贾纯亮, 姚远, 康恺, 张磊, 李翰嵩. 联合两种微创术式治疗直肠癌的临床疗效研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 19-21.

Lei Liang, Yuanting Liu, Chunliang Jia, Yuan Yao, Kai Kang, Lei Zhang, Hansong Li. Clinical study of combined minimally invasive surgical treatments for rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 19-21.

目的

评估腹腔镜下直肠癌切除术(LCRs)后进行经自然腔道标本取出术(NOSE)的患者的成功率和影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析2016年4月至2018年4月76例直肠癌患者LCRs之后尝试进行NOSE的资料。肛门入路作为第一选择，当此入路失败时，女性患者可尝试经阴道入路。如果两种入路都失败，则判定该患者不适合接受NOSE，并通过腹壁切口取出。记录手术指征，切除位置，实施程序，切口部位，吸引方法，标本大小和NOSE失败病例。采用SPSS18.0软件对数据进行统计分析，NOSE成功与失败病例χ2检验；标本大小采用t检验。P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

7例患者需要在手术切除时转为腹壁开放切口手术。在剩下的69例患者中，51例(73.9%)成功完成LCRs后的NOSE，18例(26.1%)失败。患者的标本经肛门和经阴道入路提取的数量分别是48例(94.1%)和3例(5.9%)。LCRs后，结肠病变严重和肿瘤体积大的男性患者NOSE成功率较低。经肛门和经阴道切除标本的平均大小分别为(3.6±3.2)和(5.6±1.5) cm，失败病例的平均肿瘤大小为(6.6±4.4) cm，(P<0.05)。

结论

直肠癌患者在腹腔镜下直肠癌切除术后行经自然腔道标本取出术效果更好，较轻微的病变和女性患者具有较高的成功率。

关键词: 直肠肿瘤, 腹腔镜检查, 自然腔道内镜手术
Objective

To investigate success rate and influential factors of laparoscopic colorectal resections (LCRs) followed by natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) in patients with rectal cancer.

Methods

From April 2016 to April 2018, retrospective analysis were performed in 76 patients with rectal cancer who received LCRs+ NOSE. We prefer to anal approach firstly, however if it fails, vaginal approach would be tried. If both approaches fail, the patient would be judged to be unsuitable for NOSE, then specimen would be removed through abdominal incision. Surgical indications, location of excision, procedure, incision site, method of aspiration, specimen size, and NOSE failure were recorded. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS18.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data, and the chi-square test of the success and failure cases of NOSE was used to analyze the data. The size of specimens was examined by t-test. P<0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

7 cases of conversions to open abdominal incision occurred during operation. 51 (73.9%) patients, including 48(94.1%) cases of anal approach and 3 (5.9%) cases of vagina approach, received successful NOSE after LCRs, while 18 (26.1%) cases failed A lower success rate of NOSE occurred mainly in male patients with severe colon lesions and large tumor size. The mean size of removed specimens was (3.6±3.2) and (5.6±1.5) cm by using anal approach and vaginal approach respectively, and the mean tumor size of the failed cases was (6.6±4.4) cm (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Better prognosis could be achieved in patients with rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic resection + NOSE, while higher success rate could be achieved when milder lesions or in female patients.

Key words: Rectal neoplasms, Laparoscopy, Natural orifice endoscopic surgery
表1 69例直肠癌患者NOSE成功与失败病例基本信息比较[例(%)]
基本信息与病理结果 自然腔道取出标本 P值
成功(n＝51) 失败(n＝18)
年龄(±s，岁) 56.9±13.4 60.5±13.3 0.34
性别 ? ? ?
? 男 27(52.9) 15 (83.3) ?
? 女 24(47.0) 3(16.7) 0.02
病理结果 ? ? ?
? 恶性 47(92.1) 16(88.9) ?
? 良性 4(7.8) 2(11.1) 0.71
表2 69例NOSE成功与失败病例结肠/直肠病变情况比较[例(%)]
结直肠病变 例数 自然腔道取出标本 P值
成功 失败
结肠病变 33 18(54.5) 15(45.5) ?
直肠病变 30 29(96.7) 1(3.3) 0.005
结肠直肠病变 6 4(66.7) 2(33.3) ?
[1]
Ackerman SJ，Daniel S，Baik R, et al.Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic－assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic－assisted surgery？[J]．J Med Econ，2018，21(3):254-261.
[2]
Aibara N，Hotchi M，Kotegawa H，et al.A case report of tuberculous peritonitis in rectal cancer diagnosed by staging laparoscopy and post－treatment status at laparoscopic low－anterior resection[J]．Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi，2017，114(8):1467-1473.
[3]
Allaix ME，Furnee E，Esposito L，et al.Analysis of Early and Long－Term Oncologic Outcomes After Converted Laparoscopic Resection Compared to Primary Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer[J]．World J Surg，2018，42(10):3405-3414.
[4]
Andersen P，Erichsen R，Froslev T，et al.Open versus laparoscopic rectal cancer resection and risk of subsequent incisional hernia repair and paracolostomy hernia repair: a nationwide population－based cohort study[J]．Surg Endosc，2018，32(1):134-144.
[5]
Chen D，Zhao H，Huang Q, et al.Application of spontaneously closing cannula ileostomy in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer[J]．Oncol Lett，2017，14(5):5299-5306.
[6]
Chen H, Ma B, Gao P, et al.Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection versus an open approach for low rectal cancer: a meta－analysis[J]．World J Surg Oncol，2017，15(1):229-229.
[7]
Clark LA，Peters WR.Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer in the elderly[J]．Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)，2016，29(4):436-438.
[8]
Draeger T，Volkel V，Gerken M，et al.Long－term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic versus open rectal cancer resection: a high－quality population－based analysis in a Southern German district[J]．Surg Endosc，2018，32(10):4096-4104.
[9]
Fu C，Zhou Z，Han J，et al.[Protective measures in laparoscopic resection for upper or mid rectal cancer and sigmoid colon cancer with transrectal specimen extraction surgery][J]．Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi，2017，20(10):1151-1155.
[10]
李世拥．腹部无切口腹腔镜直肠癌经肛门切除吻合术的实践与发展[J/CD]．中华普外科手术学杂志：电子版，2016，10(2):91-93.
[11]
Hain E，Manceau G，Maggiori L，et al.Bowel dysfunction after anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic sphincter－saving operative intervention for rectal cancer: A case－matched study in 46 patients using the Low Anterior Resection Score[J]．Surgery，2017，161(4):1028-1039.
[12]
Haksal M，Okkabaz N，Atici AE，et al.Fortune of temporary ileostomies in patients treated with laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer[J]．Ann Surg Treat Res，2017，92(1):35-41.
[13]
He Y，Zhu Z，Liu S，et al. Effect of anastomotic reinforcing sutures on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]．Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi，2018，21(4):431-436.
[14]
孙跃明，封益飞．腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术[J/CD]．中华普外科手术学杂志：电子版，2016，10(3):199-199.
[15]
Hirano Y，Hattori M，Douden K，et al.Short－Term Clinical and Oncological Outcomes after Single－Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer[J]．Dig Surg, 2018，35(2):111-115.
[16]
Ichinohe D，Morohashi H，Umetsu S，et al. A Case of Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy(S－1 plus Oxaliplatin)and Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer[J]．Gan To Kagaku Ryoho，2016，43(12):1715-1717.
[17]
Ihnat P，Slivova I，Tulinsky L，et al.Anorectal dysfunction after laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer with and without radiotherapy (manometry study)[J]．J Surg Oncol, 2018，117(4):710-716.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[8] 付振保, 曹万龙, 刘富红. 腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.
[9] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[10] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[11] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[12] 马慧颖, 凡新苓, 覃仕瑞, 陈佳赟, 曹莹, 徐源, 金晶, 唐源. 磁共振加速器治疗局部晚期直肠癌的初步经验[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 519-523.
[13] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[14] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[15] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号