切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 254 -257. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.03.022

所属专题: 文献

论著

低位直肠癌Dixon保肛手术联合预防性回肠造口的应用效果观察
刘德洪1,(), 黄江平1   
  1. 1. 641400 成都,简阳市中医医院
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-20 出版日期:2018-06-26
  • 通信作者: 刘德洪

Application of sphincter preserving Dixon surgery combined with prophylactic ileostomy in low rectal cancer

Dehong Liu1,(), Jiangping Huang1   

  1. 1. Jianyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, sichuan, chengdu, 641400 China
  • Received:2017-12-20 Published:2018-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Dehong Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Dehong, Email:
引用本文:

刘德洪, 黄江平. 低位直肠癌Dixon保肛手术联合预防性回肠造口的应用效果观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 254-257.

Dehong Liu, Jiangping Huang. Application of sphincter preserving Dixon surgery combined with prophylactic ileostomy in low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 254-257.

目的

考察低位直肠切除保肛手术(Dixon)联合预防性回肠造口治疗低位直肠癌的应用效果。

方法

选取2012年7月至2016年7月低位直肠癌住院患者62例,按患者手术方式分为单纯保肛组(29例)和联合造口组(33例)。单纯保肛组患者仅接受低位Dixon保肛手术治疗,联合造口组患者在单纯保肛组基础上联合预防性回肠造口治疗。采用SPSS 18.0统计软件进行统计学处理,术后恢复情况指标、术前、术后3个月及6个月肛门功能和术后生活质量评分等计量资料以±s表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症发生率等计数资料比较采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

联合造口组的手术时间、恢复排气排便时间、恢复进食时间、下床时间和住院时间均明显少于单纯保肛组(P<0.05);联合造口组的吻合口漏、吻合口狭窄发生率较低,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);手术后3个月和6个月,联合造口组的Wexner评分均明显低于单纯保肛组(P<0.05);同单纯保肛组相比,联合造口组术后6个月排尿频率、脓血便、排便频率、排气失禁、排便失禁和焦虑评分均较低(P<0.05)。

结论

低位直肠癌Dixon保肛手术联合预防性回肠造口可在加快患者恢复速度的同时,降低术后吻合口漏等并发症发生率,提高术后生活质量,值得在临床推广。

Objective

To investigate the application effects of sphincter preserving Dixon surgery combined with prophylactic ileostomy in low rectal cancer.

Methods

From July 2012 to July 2016, 62 cases of low rectal cancer treated in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed and were divided into sphincter preserving group (n=29) and combined ileostomy group (n=33) according to the operational manner. Patients in sphincter preserving group were only given low Dixon rectal surgery while patients in combined ileostomy group were given the same surgery combined with preventive ileostomy treatment. Statistical analysis were performed using SPSS statistical software 18.0, measurement data such as postoperative recovery index, anal function before surgery, 3 months and 6 months as well as postoperative life quality score were represented by (±s), compared with t test; the incidence of postoperative complications and count data were compared using the χ2 test. The difference of P<0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

Compared with sphincter preserving group, the operation time, exhaust time, recovery time, ambulation time and hospitalization time were significantly lower in combined ileostomy group (P<0.05). Besides, the anastomotic leakage rate and anastomotic stenosis rate were lower in combined ileostomy group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); 3 months and 6 months after surgery, the Wexner score in the combined ileostomy group was significantly lower than in sphincter preserving group (P<0.05); 6 months after surgery, patients in combined ileostomy group had higher scores on urination, pus and blood stool, defecation frequency, exhaust defecation incontinence, incontinence and anxiety score (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Application of sphincter preserving Dixon surgery combined with preventive ileostomy can promote the recovery of patients in low rectal cancer Dixon rate, reduce the postoperative incidence of anastomotic fistula and other complications, improve the postoperative quality of life, which is worth application clinically.

表1 62例低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者一般资料比较(例)
表2 62例低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者术后恢复情况比较(±s)
表3 62例低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者并发症及预后比较(例)
表4 62例低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组术后6个月EORTC QLQ-CR29量表评分比较(±s)
[1]
张勇,郭子健,曹华祥,等. 低位直肠癌保肛中预防性造口的临床应用分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(2):133-136.
[2]
谢铭,杨雪峰,黄韩冬. 超低位直肠癌保肛术[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(3):198-198.
[3]
Sun Z, Yu X, Wang H, et al. Factors affecting sphincter-preserving resection treatment for patients with low rectal cancer[J]. Experimental & Therapeutic Medicine, 2015, 10(2):484-490.
[4]
You X, Wang Y, Zhao X, et al. Application of protective appendicostomy after sphicter-preserving surgery for patients with low rectal carcinoma who are at high-risk of anastomotic leakage[J]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2015, 18(6):573-576.
[5]
胡文明. 用Dixon手术治疗低位直肠癌的效果探究[J]. 当代医药论丛,2017, 15(10):51-52.
[6]
Kim YA, Lee GJ, Park SW, et al. Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With the Nonreversal Ileostomy Following Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer[J]. Ann Colo,2015, 31(3):98-102.
[7]
刘秋华,张伯,涂建成,等. 双器械吻合联合全直肠系膜切除Dixon保肛手术治疗直肠癌的临床效果观察[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2016, 26(10):99-102.
[8]
李永坤,张文娟. 预防性回肠造口在腹腔镜超低位直肠癌保肛术中的应用[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2016, 19(2):130-131.
[9]
Huang S, Chi P, Lin H, et al. Risk factors and clinical features of delayed anastomotic fistula following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer[J]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2016, 19(4):390-395.
[10]
徐辉,张汝一,姬清华,等. 低位直肠癌保肛术行回肠造口与单做保肛术的疗效比较[J]. 广东医学,2017, 38(7):1082-1084.
[1] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[2] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[3] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[4] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[5] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[6] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[7] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[8] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[9] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[10] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[11] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[12] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[13] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[14] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[15] 王灿, 樊昊, 张卫, 于冠宇. LARS 评分的研制回顾与应用现状[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要