切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 258 -260. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.03.023

所属专题: 文献

论著

中青年和老年结肠癌患者行腹腔镜下根治术的疗效差异比较
田彬1,(), 王绍华1, 傅忠文1, 李洋1, 陈华2   
  1. 1. 641400 四川简阳,简阳市人民医院胃肠外科
    2. 400038 重庆西南医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-25 出版日期:2018-06-26
  • 通信作者: 田彬

Curative effect of young-middle-aged and elderly patients with colon cancer underwent laparoscopic surgery

Bin Tian1,(), Shaohua Wang1, Zhongwen Fu1, Yang Li1, Hua Chen2   

  1. 1. Department of gastrointestinal surgery, Jianyang People’s Hospital, Sichuan 641400
    2. Department of gastrointestinal surgery, Southwest Hospital, Chongqing 400038
  • Received:2017-07-25 Published:2018-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Bin Tian
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tian Bin, Email:
引用本文:

田彬, 王绍华, 傅忠文, 李洋, 陈华. 中青年和老年结肠癌患者行腹腔镜下根治术的疗效差异比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 258-260.

Bin Tian, Shaohua Wang, Zhongwen Fu, Yang Li, Hua Chen. Curative effect of young-middle-aged and elderly patients with colon cancer underwent laparoscopic surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 258-260.

目的

探索中青年和老年结肠癌患者行腹腔镜下根治术的疗效。

方法

选取2012年1月至2014年2月中青年和老年结肠癌确诊患者各60例,分为中青年组和老年组,进行腹腔镜下根治术,其中中青年组患者中28例进行左半结肠切除术,32例进行右半结肠切除术;老年组患者中24例行左半结肠切除术,36例行右半结肠切除术,采用SPSS 18.0版统计学软件进行分析,术中术后相关指标以均数±标准差表示,组间比较采用t检验;术后并发症发生率采用χ2检验;以P<0.05表示差异具有统计学意义。

结果

中青年组和老年组患者进行左半切结肠切除术的并发症发生率分别为7.1%(2/28)、8.3%(2/24), P>0.05;两组患者随访2年的复发率、近端转移率差异无统计学意义;右半切除术的并发症发生率分别为15.6%(5/32)、33.3%(12/36),差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.05),结果表明中青年组右半结肠切除术患者术后并发症发生率明显低于老年组。

结论

不同年龄段结肠癌患者进行右半结肠切除术的术后并发症发生率均明显高于左半结肠切除术,但中青年患者术后并发症发生率明显低于老年患者。

Objective

To explore the curative effect of laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer for young-middle-aged and elderly patients.

Methods

From January 2012 to February 2014, young-middle-aged and elderly-aged patients with colon cancer underwent laparoscopic colectomy were enrolled and 60 cases were divided into each groups. 28 patients in young-middle-aged group received left hemicolectomy and 32 cases underwent right hemicolectomy; 24 cases in Elderly group received left hemicolectomy, and 36 cases underwent right hemicolectomy. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 18.0 software, intraoperative related indicators and the postoperative indicators were presented as (±s) and were examined by using t test; Count data was examined by using chi square test. P<0.05 was considered as significant difference.

Results

The complication rates of patients received left hemicolectomy in the young-middle-aged group and elderly group were 7.1% (2/28) and 8.3% (2/24), with no significant difference between 2 group P>0.05.There was no significant difference in terms of 2 years recurrence rate and proximal metastasis rate within follow-up period between two groups. The complication rates of two groups underwent right-laparoscopic surgery were 15.6% (5/32) and 33.3% (12/36) respectively, with significant difference P<0.05. There was no significant difference of the incidence of postoperative complications between 2 groups received left hemicolectomy. However, the postoperative complication rates of young-middle-aged group received right hemicolectomy was significantly lower than that of elderly group.

Conclusion

The incidence of postoperative complications of different aged patients underwent right hemicolectomy is significantly higher than left-hemicolectomy, and complication rate of young-middle-aged patients is significantly lower than that of elderly patients.

表1 120例结肠癌患者不同手术方式两组患者临床基线数据的比较(±s)
表2 120例结肠癌患者不同年龄段两组患者手术基本情况比较(±s)
表3 120例结肠癌患者不同年龄段两组患者术后并发症发生率比较(例)
[1]
俞晓峰. 老年结肠癌行腹腔镜切除术的疗效观察[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗,2016, 21(3):421-423.
[2]
Benson AB, Arnoletti JP, Bekaiisaab T, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Colon Cancer Version 1:2012[J]. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Jnccn, 2011, 9(11):1238-1290.
[3]
中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治手术操作指南(2008版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2009, 12(3):310-312.
[4]
陈平. 腹腔镜根治术与开腹术治疗老年结肠癌患者的术后随访研究[J]. 结直肠肛门外科,2016,22(6):565-568.
[5]
项田岗,刘国兴,明从坤,等. 腹腔镜Ⅲ期结肠癌根治术与开腹手术的临床疗效比较[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2017, 22(6):417-420.
[6]
周宁. 改良右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌61例临床疗效分析[J]. 中国医药指南,2016, 14(32):140-140.
[7]
郑民华,马君俊. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治规范化水平[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(1):1-3.
[8]
张忠涛,王今.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治规范化相关问题[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2015,9( 1):4-6.
[1] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[5] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[6] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[7] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[8] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[9] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[10] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[11] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[12] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[13] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[14] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[15] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
阅读次数
全文


摘要