切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 215 -218. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.03.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜与开腹手术对于进展期远端胃癌患者术后应激反应及临床疗效研究
张亦磊1, 张佳2, 李涛3, 梁明1, 肖栋1, 李晓涛3,()   
  1. 1. 723000 西安交大医学院附属汉中3201医院肿瘤外科
    2. 710005 西安交通大学医学院
    3. 723000 汉中市中心医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-30 出版日期:2018-06-26
  • 通信作者: 李晓涛

Postoperative stress response and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with advanced distal gastric cancer

Yilei Zhang1, Jia Zhang2, Tao Li3, Ming Liang1, Dong Xiao1, Xiaotao Li3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology, Hanzhong 3201 Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University Medical College, 723000
    2. Xi’an Jiaotong University Medical College 710005
    3. Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Hanzhong central hospital HanZhong 723000
  • Received:2018-01-30 Published:2018-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Xiaotao Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Xiaotao, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Projects funded by the National Natural Science Foundation(81702430)
引用本文:

张亦磊, 张佳, 李涛, 梁明, 肖栋, 李晓涛. 腹腔镜与开腹手术对于进展期远端胃癌患者术后应激反应及临床疗效研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 215-218.

Yilei Zhang, Jia Zhang, Tao Li, Ming Liang, Dong Xiao, Xiaotao Li. Postoperative stress response and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with advanced distal gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 215-218.

目的

观察腹腔镜与开腹手术在进展期远端胃癌治疗中患者的应激反应情况及临床疗效。

方法

2015年1月至2017年1月期间,前瞻性研究收治的进展期胃癌患者94例,将患者随机分为腹腔镜组和开腹手术组,每组各47例。腹腔镜组给予腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术,开腹手术组给予开腹远端胃癌根治术,术后随访1年,观察两组患者手术情况、术后康复情况和临床结局。采用SPSS22.0进行统计分析,两组术中术后指标和AngII水平等采用(±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症行χ2检验;以P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

腹腔镜组患者术中出血量明显少于开腹手术组,差异具有显著统计学意义(P=0.000);两组患者术前AngII和CRP均无统计学差异(P>0.05),术后24 h时,腹腔镜组患者应激反应指标AngII、CRP水平显著低于开腹手术组(P=0.000)。与开腹手术组比较,腹腔镜组患者术后肛门排气时间显著缩短(P=0.000、住院时间显著缩短(P=0.000)、术后引流时间显著缩短(P=0.017)、引流量显著减少(P=0.009)。腹腔镜组并发症总发生率明显低于开腹手术组,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.014)。两组患者手术时间、淋巴结清扫数目、死亡率和复发率等比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术是安全有效的,可以显著降低患者术后应激反应,减少术后并发症发生率,加速患者术后康复。

Objective

To compare safety and efficacy of the laparoscopy and laparotomy on the treatment of advanced distal gastric carcinoma.

Methods

94 advanced gastric carcinoma patients from January 2015 to January 2017 in our hospital were retrospectively collected and were divided into one observation group and one control group, 47 patients each group. The patients in the observation group received laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy for distal gastric carcinoma while the ones in the control group received laparotomy-assisted radical gastrectomy for distal gastric carcinoma, and all patients were followed-up 1 year. Operation condition, postoperative rehabilitation and clinical outcomes of the patients in both groups were observed. SPSS22.0 was used for statistical analysis, The intraoperative and postoperative indexes and AngII level in the two groups were expressed by(±s), T test of independent samples was used; Postoperative complications were examined by ray test, The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Results

The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.000); There was no significant difference in preoperative AngII and CRP between the two groups (P>0.05), After 24 h, the indexes of stress reaction AngII and CRP in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P=0.000). Compared with the control group, the anal exhaust time of the observation group was significantly shortened (P=0.000), and the length of hospital stay was significantly shortened (P=0.000), The postoperative drainage time was significantly shortened (P=0.017), and the flow rate was significantly shortened (P=0.009). The total incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P=0.014). The operation time, the number of lymph node dissection, mortality and recurrence rate were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is safe and effective, which can significantly reduce postoperative stress response, reduce postoperative complications, and accelerate postoperative rehabilitation.

表1 94例进展期胃癌患者不同手术方法两组患者一般资料比较(例,±s)
表2 94例进展期胃癌患者不同手术方法两组患者手术情况比较(±s)
表3 94例进展期胃癌患者不同手术方法两组患者术后应激反应比较(±s)
表4 94例进展期胃癌患者不同手术方法两组患者术后康复情况比较(±s)
表5 94例进展期胃癌患者不同手术方法两组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
[1]
Daniyal M, Ahmad S, Ahmad M, et al. Risk Factors and Epidemiology of Gastric Cancer in Pakistan[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2015,16(12):4821-4824.
[2]
Mieno H, Yamashita K, Hosoda K, et al. Conversion surgery after combination chemotherapy of docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 (DCS) for far-advanced gastric cancer[J]. Surg Today,2017,12(4):771-777.
[3]
Kinoshita T, Kaito A. Current status and future perspectives of laparoscopic radical surgery for advanced gastric cancer[J]. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol,2017,2(2):43-48.
[4]
Yamada N, Akai A, Nomura Y, et al. The impact and optimal indication of non-curative gastric resection for stage IV advanced gastric cancer diagnosed during surgery: 10 years of experience at a single institute[J]. World J Surg Oncol,2016,14(79):882-888.
[5]
Chen XZ, Chen HN, Liu K, et al. Perineural Invasion Underlines the Necessity of Upper Lesser Curvature Skeletonization in Radical Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer[J]. Ann Surg,2017,265(5):e67-e68.
[6]
Yamamoto M, Zaima M, Yamamoto H, et al. Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer Following Distal Gastrectomy with Radical Lymphadenectomy[J]. Hepatogastroenterology,2015,62(139):752-757.
[7]
Chen XZ, Chen HN, Liu K, et al. Perineural Invasion Underlines the Necessity of Upper Lesser Curvature Skeletonization in Radical Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer[J]. Ann Surg,2015,12(8):678-684.
[8]
Zhou Y, Zhang GJ, Wang J, et al. Current status of lymph node micrometastasis in gastric cancer[J]. Oncotarget,2017,19(21):691-696.
[9]
Lee CM, Park SS, Kim JH. Current status and scope of lymph node micrometastasis in gastric cancer[J]. J Gastric Cancer,2015,15(1):1-9.
[10]
Sonoda H, Tani T. Clinical significance of molecular diagnosis for gastric cancer lymph node micrometastasis[J]. World J Gastroenterol,2014,20(38):13728-13733.
[11]
Dos Santos LV, Veiga Faria TM, Lima AB, et al. Timing of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer[J]. Colorectal Dis,2016,32(16):789-794.
[12]
Nachiappan S, Askari A, Mamidanna R, et al. The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy timing on overall survival following colorectal cancer resection[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2015,41(12):1636-1644.
[13]
Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. J Clin Oncol,2016,34(12):1350-1357.
[14]
Du Y, Cheng X, Xu Z, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer[J]. Chin J Cancer Res,2013,25(4):460-462.
[15]
Yao H, Huang Q, Zhu Z, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer (Billroth II anastomosis)[J]. Chin J Cancer Res,2013,25(4):451-452.
[16]
Chen Hu J, Xin Jiang L, Cai L, et al. Preliminary experience of fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2012,16(10):1830-1839.
[17]
韦炳邓,罗中,关秀文,等. 腹腔镜辅助与开腹远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效比较[J]. 南昌大学学报(医学版),2015,55(01):44-47.
[18]
董峰,牛跃平,孙培春,等. 腹腔镜辅助下与开腹胃癌根治术治疗进展期远端胃癌临床对照研究[J/OL]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2013,27(05):457-459.
[1] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[2] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[3] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[4] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[5] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[9] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[10] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[11] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[12] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
[13] 丁晨梦, 胡雪慧, 闫沛, 程乔. 髋部骨折术后患者居家康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 365-372.
[14] 张敏洁, 张小杉, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 赵捷, 白天昊, 王雅晳. 氢气治疗心肌缺血再灌注损伤的作用机制及展望[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 744-748.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要