Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04): 326-330. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2026.04.008

• Original Article • Previous Articles    

Clinical analysis of laparoscopic left hepatectomy with different surgical approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma

Yulou Yan1, Shengqian Hong1, Xian Su2, Shuo Wang1, Fuzhen Qi1, Jianbo Xu1,()   

  1. 1 Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Huai'an No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Jiangsu Province 223300, China
    2 Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201800, China
  • Received:2026-03-19 Online:2026-08-26 Published:2026-07-21
  • Contact: Jianbo Xu
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(82203722)

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic anatomical left hepatectomy via anterior approach versus tunnel approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A total of 114 patients with HCC who underwent laparoscopic anatomical left hepatectomy from December 2019 to December 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into the anterior approach group (n=57) and the tunnel approach group (n=57) according to surgical access. Perioperative parameters, liver function indices and inflammatory factors were compared using the t test or χ2 test. The 12-month postoperative disease-free survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Log-Rank test was performed for intergroup comparison.

Results

The tunnel approach group had less intraoperative blood loss, as well as shorter hepatic portal occlusion time, gastrointestinal function recovery time, drainage tube removal time and hospital stay than the anterior approach group (P<0.05). Compared with preoperative levels, alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) were elevated on postoperative day 3 and day 7 in both groups; these two indicators decreased on postoperative day 7 relative to day 3, and were significantly lower in the tunnel approach group (P<0.05). Interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and C-reactive protein (CRP) increased on postoperative day 3 and decreased on postoperative day 7 in both groups, with lower levels observed in the tunnel approach group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the overall incidence of postoperative complications and 12-month disease-free survival between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with laparoscopic anatomical left hepatectomy via the anterior approach, the tunnel approach can reduce intraoperative blood loss and hepatic portal occlusion time, accelerate the recovery of gastrointestinal function, drainage tube removal and hospital discharge. It also alleviates surgical damage to liver function and postoperative inflammatory response with favorable safety, and facilitates short-term postoperative recovery of HCC patients.

Key words: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Hepatectomy, Laparoscopes, Anterior Approach, Tunnel Approach, Clinical Effect

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-63138570 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd