Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04): 464-467. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.04.031

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical analysis of 26 cases of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with interventional technique combined with endovascular repair

Long Sun1, Yingxue Hao1,(), Mingqi Wang2   

  1. 1. First Affiliated Hospital of Army Military Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China
    2. Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical College, Zhejiang 310009, China
  • Received:2020-06-18 Online:2021-08-17 Published:2021-09-08
  • Contact: Yingxue Hao
  • Supported by:
    Project of Zhejiang Health and Family Planning Commission(2017KY384)

Abstract:

Objective

To analyze the clinical outcome of 26 cases of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with interventional technique combined with endovascular repair.

Methods

The clinical data of 56 patients with complex abdominal aortic aneurysm from April 2015 to June 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into open group (N=30 cases, open operation) and intracavitary group (n=26 cases, endovascular repair+ interventional technique) . SPSS 23.0 software were used to analyze the data, which were in accordance with the normal distribution, and were expressed as (±s), and examined by using independent t test ; the total incidence were examined by using χ2 test. Kaplan Meier method were used for survival analysis. A P value of< 0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

Compared with the laparotomy group, the intracavitary group had a shorter operative time, less intraoperative bleeding and intraoperative blood transfusion, while ICU observative time, postoperative abrosia time, and hospitalization time were shorter (P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the intracavitary group was lower than that in the laparotomy group (15.4% vs. 33.3%)(P<0.05). The 3-year postoperative survival rate in the intracavitary group was higher than that in the laparotomy group (80.8% vs. 63.3%), however with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Interventional technology combined with endovascular repair surgery of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms could reduce surgical trauma, shorten postoperative recovery time, and reduce the risk of complications, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words: Aortic aneurysm, abdominal, Endovascular repair surgery, Radiology, interventional, Postoperative complications, Survival analysis

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd