Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (06): 647-650. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.06.015

• Original Article • Previous Articles    

Comparison of recent follow-up between laparoscopic D2 radical surgery and conventional radical surgery for advanced gastric cancer after SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Jie Xu1, Yajun Li2, Yiwen Feng3,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Medical College, Xi’an Shaanxi Province 710000, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region 750004, China
    3. Department of Pharmacy, Ankang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Ankang Shaanxi Province 725000, China
  • Received:2024-01-25 Online:2024-12-26 Published:2024-09-27
  • Contact: Yiwen Feng
  • Supported by:
    Ningxia Natural Science Foundation Project(2022AAC03525)

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the difference of recent follow-up results between laparoscopic D2 radical surgery and conventional open radical surgery in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with Ticeo combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

Clinical data of 91 patients who underwent surgery after SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 2020 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. 46 patients underwent laparoscopic D2 radical resection for gastric cancer (endoscopy group) and 45 patients underwent laparotomy (laparotomy group). SPSS 27.0 software was used to analyze the data. Perioperative indicators, immune function and other measurement data were described by (), and independent sample t test was used. The statistical data of postoperative complications were measured by χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyze the survival of the patients. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The time of gastrointestinal function recovery and hospital stay in laparoscopy group were shorter than those in laparotomy group, the amount of intraoperative blood loss was less than that in laparotomy group, and the operative time was longer than that in laparotomy group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes between the two groups (P>0.05). The levels of 3dCD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in endoscopic group were higher than those in laparotomy group, and CD8+ was lower than those in laparotomy group (P<0.05). The levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin and C-reactive protein (CRP) in 1d and 3d endoscopic group were lower than those in open group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in survival time between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic D2 radical surgery for gastric cancer after SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy can achieve short-term efficacy comparable to that of open radical surgery, but laparoscopic D2 radical surgery for gastric cancer has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, short recovery time of gastrointestinal function, fewer postoperative complications, and less stress reaction.

Key words: Stomach Neoplasms, Laparoscopes, Tigio, Oxaliplatin, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Postoperative Complications

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd