Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04): 426-429. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.04.020

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative research of laparoscopic radical resection in treating right colon cancers with different approaches

Runzhi Wang1,(), Qiang Sun1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Second People’s Hospital of Fuyang City, Fuyang, Anhui 236029, China
  • Received:2020-08-27 Online:2021-08-17 Published:2021-09-08
  • Contact: Runzhi Wang
  • Supported by:
    Anhui Science and Technology Project(1701042301); Key Projects of Medical Science Research of Anhui Health Department(2018A039)

Abstract:

Objective

To analyze the clinical outcome of laparoscopic expanded right hemicolectomy through caudal and/or medial approach for right colon carcinoma.

Methods

Clinical data of 50 patients with colon cancers located at liver flexure who underwent laparoscopic expanded right hemicolectomy from January 2017 to June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different surgical approaches, patients were divided into caudal group (n=25) and traditional group (n=25). Patients in the caudal group received laparoscopic surgery through caudal and medial approach, while patients in the traditional group received laparoscopic surgery through medial approach. SPSS22.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Measurement data such as perioperative indexes and blood inflammation indexes were expressed by (±s), and were examined by using independent t test. The statistical data of postoperative complications was examined by using χ2 test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

Compared with the perioperative indicators in the traditional group, the operation time, exhausting time and drainage tube removal time in the caudal group were significantly shortened, and intraoperative bleeding was significantly reduced, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). On the 7th day after surgery, the serum levels of CRP, TNF-α and IL-6 in the caudal group were significantly better than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). Postoperative complications in the caudal group were significantly lower than those in the traditional group (12.0% vs 36.0%, P<0.05). Follow-up ranged from 12 to 49 months, no perioperative death, recurrence and distant tumor metastasis occurred in both 2 groups.

Conclusion

Caudal/medial approach is safe and effective in laparoscopic surgery for patients with colon cancer located at liver flexure, with advantages such as simpler operation, less operative time, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospitalization time, and fewer complications.

Key words: Colonic neoplasms, Colectomy, Laparoscopes, Medial and caudal approach, Comparative effectiveness research

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd