Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05): 525-527. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.05.030

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of the effects of different surgical treatments for stage Ⅰ~Ⅱ breast cancer on the preservation of intercostobrachial nerve

Wei bing Jiang1,()   

  1. 1. Cardiothoracic surgery, Xuancheng Central Hospital, Anhui Province, 242000
  • Received:2018-09-18 Online:2019-10-26 Published:2019-10-26
  • Contact: Wei bing Jiang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jiang Weiping, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the effect of different surgical treatments for stage Ⅰ~Ⅱ breast cancer on the preservation of intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN).

Methods

72 patients with early breast cancer treated in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into breast-conserving group (n=38) and radical group (n=34) according to different surgical methods. Among them, patients in the breast-preserving group were treated with breast-conserving surgery, while those in the radical group were treated with modified radical mastectomy. The data were analyzed by SPSS19.0 software. The perioperative related indicators and postoperative mammary gland function scores were described by (±s) and compared with independent t test. The postoperative complication rate and postoperative limb sensation were described by (n, %), and compared with χ2 test. The difference was statistically significant when P<0.05.

Results

Compared with the radical group, the perioperative indexes such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss and total drainage volume were significantly lower in the breast-preserving group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissection between the two groups(P>0.05). In addition, the total incidence of complications in the breast-preserving group was 10.5%, which was significantly lower than that in the radical group (29.4%) (P<0.05). The incidences of postoperative burning pain, numbness, pain, sensory loss and no sensory feelings of the patients in the breast-preserving group were significantly lower than those in the radical group (P<0.05). The scores of breast function in the postoperative breast-preserving group were significantly better than those in the radical group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Breast-conserving surgery has a good therapeutic effect on patients with stage Ⅰ~Ⅱ breast cancer, which can effectively preserve the patient’s ICBN and improve its mammary gland function, which is worthy of clinical recommendation.

Key words: Breast neoplasms, Mastectomy, modified radical, Mastectomy, segmental, Comparative effectiveness research

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd