切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (03) : 231 -234. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2026.03.009

论著

腹腔镜胆囊切除术在高龄患者中的安全性及有效性分析
赵方, 陈廷昊(), 陈泳松, 王健宇, 刘希   
  1. 641300 四川 资阳,资阳市中心医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-01 出版日期:2026-06-26
  • 通信作者: 陈廷昊

Analysis of safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients

Fang Zhao, Tinghao Chen(), Yongsong Chen, Jianyu Wang, Xi Liu   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Ziyang Central Hospital, Ziyang Sichuan Province 641300, China
  • Received:2025-08-01 Published:2026-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Tinghao Chen
  • Supported by:
    Foundation Project of Sichuan Geriatric Association(24SCLN076)
引用本文:

赵方, 陈廷昊, 陈泳松, 王健宇, 刘希. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术在高龄患者中的安全性及有效性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 231-234.

Fang Zhao, Tinghao Chen, Yongsong Chen, Jianyu Wang, Xi Liu. Analysis of safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(03): 231-234.

目的

探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术应用于高龄患者的有效性及安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2023年1月至2024年12月621例因急性胆囊炎接受胆囊切除术患者的临床资料,按年龄分为高龄组(n=82,年龄≥70岁)和对照组(n=539,年龄<70岁)。使用SPSS 22.0 统计软件进行数据分析,计数资料采用χ2Fisher精确检验;符合正态分布的计量资料以(

±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验。采用多因素回归分析影响术后发病率和出院率的危险因素。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者年龄、体质量指数(BMI)、ASA分级、合并基础疾病[心血管疾病、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、肾功能不全]、手术时间、住院天数比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高龄组患者术后肺部感染、腹腔感染和总并发症发生率更高、术后住院时间更长(P<0.05)。高龄组合并基础疾病(如心血管疾病、糖尿病)比例更高、ASA 分级更差,可能是其术后肺部感染、腹腔感染发生率升高的重要诱因。多因素分析显示糖尿病、ASA 评分Ⅲ级、手术持续时间>80 min是术后发病率增加的独立危险因素。合并心血管疾病、慢性肾功能不全和住院时间是与出院率独立相关的因素。

结论

在充分评估基础疾病、优化围手术期管理(如控制血糖、选择经验丰富团队缩短手术时间)的前提下,腹腔镜胆囊切除术应用于高龄患者是相对安全的,术后并发症风险可接受。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients.

Methods

Clinical data of 621 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis from January 2023 to December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into an elderly group (n=82, age ≥70 years) and a control group (n=539, age <70 years). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 software. Categorical data were analyzed using the χ2 test or exact test. Normally distributed continuous data were presented as (

±s) and compared using the independent-samples t test. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify risk factors affecting postoperative morbidity and discharge rate. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were significant differences between the two groups in age, body mass index (BMI), ASA classification, comorbidities [cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), renal insufficiency], operation time, and length of hospital stay (P<0.05). The elderly group had higher incidences of postoperative pulmonary infection, intra-abdominal infection, and overall complications, as well as a longer postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05). The higher proportion of comorbidities (e.g., cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus) and poorer ASA classification in the elderly group may be important contributors to the increased incidence of postoperative pulmonary and intra-abdominal infections. Multivariate analysis showed that diabetes mellitus, ASA grade Ⅲ, and operation duration >80 minutes were independent risk factors for increased postoperative morbidity. Cardiovascular disease, chronic renal insufficiency, and length of hospital stay were factors independently associated with discharge rate.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is relatively safe in elderly patients under the premise of adequate evaluation of comorbidities and optimized perioperative management (such as blood glucose control and shortening operation time by an experienced surgical team). The risk of postoperative complications is acceptable.

表1 两组急性胆囊炎患者临床特征比较
表2 两组急性胆囊炎患者术后并发症的比较[例(%)]
表3 影响术后发病率、出院率的多因素分析
[1]
刘丹. 中国人口老龄化发展现状、成因与对策[J]. 中国老年学杂志2022,42(16):4123-4126.
[2]
段希斌,李学民,马超,等. 高龄急性重症胆囊炎患者PTGBD术后LC手术时机选择[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展2022,25(3):207-209,213.
[3]
李晓玉,江庆,汤海琴,等. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2024,18(1):57-60.
[4]
中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组. 急性胆道系统感染的诊断和治疗指南(2021版)[J]. 中华外科杂志2021,59(6):422-429.
[5]
Yetim IDervisoglu AKaraköse O,et al. Is advanced age a significant risk factor for laparoscopic cholecystectomy?[J]. Minerva Chir2010,65(5):507-513.
[6]
Escartín AGonzález MMuriel P,et al. Litiasic acute cholecystitis: application of Tokyo Guidelines in severity grading. Colecistitis aguda litiásica: aplicación de las Guías de Tokio en los criterios de gravedad[J]. Cir Cir2021,89(1):12-21.
[7]
Comes DJWennmacker SZLatenstein CSS,et al. Restrictive Strategy vs Usual Care for Cholecystectomy in Patients With Abdominal Pain and Gallstones: 5-Year Follow-Up of the SECURE Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA Surg2024,159(11):1235-1243.
[8]
Wu STang MLiu J,et al. Impact of an AI-based laparoscopic cholecystectomy coaching program on the surgical performance: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Surg2024,110(12):7816-7823.
[9]
Innes KAhmed IHudson J,et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT[J]. Health Technol Assess2024,28(26):1-151.
[10]
Shiihara MSudo YMatsushita N,et al. Preoperative difficulty assessment of interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstones[J]. Surgery2024,175(6):1503-1507.
[11]
Ng APHadaya JESakowitz S,et al. Age-stratified trends and outcomes of inpatient cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the United States[J]. Surg Open Sci2024,23:24-29.
[12]
彭一峰,莫晔,陈国斌,等. 腹腔镜胆囊动脉入路与传统入路胆囊切除术的对比分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2024,12(2):152-154.
[13]
Kuhlenschmidt KTaveras LRSchuster KM,et al. A novel preoperative score to predict severe acute cholecystitis[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg2024,96(6):870-875.
[14]
Comes DJThunnissen FMLatenstein CSS,et al. Unraveling factors associated with textbook outcome after cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated cholecystolithiasis: A posthoc analysis of individual data of 1,124 patients[J]. Surgery2024,176(2):414-419.
[1] 贺智恒, 姚德炯, 孙东方. 腹腔镜下胆囊切除术后胆瘘影响因素分析及风险预测模型的构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 175-178.
[2] 陆颖超, 黄锦山, 徐红星, 沈丹枫. 高危急性化脓性胆囊炎经肝胆囊穿刺引流术后择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术最佳时间的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 183-186.
[3] 严征远, 张恒, 曹能琦, 方兴超, 陈大敏. 单孔+1腹腔镜结直肠癌根治切除术的有效性及安全性临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 615-618.
[4] 向涵, 母德安, 王强, 黄英杰, 张伟. 3D荧光反染超微创单孔腹腔镜Ⅵ段、Ⅴ段背侧段解剖性肝切除[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 610-610.
[5] 陈系东, 王绍闯, 赵何伟, 王硕, 袁维栋. 高龄BCLC B期肝癌患者常规TACE术后急性肝功能恶化的危险因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 689-692.
[6] 陈光海, 宋云. 肝脾手术相关膈肌修复患者的临床特征及手术安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 86-91.
[7] 郑文涛, 肖静, 欧阳兵, 吴毅, 廖开友, 李春林. 载药微球CalliSpheres经支气管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 691-696.
[8] 李文洁, 师佩, 赵睿, 穆娇, 魏东东, 顾兴. 超脉冲Nd︰YAG激光消融治疗中心气道狭窄的疗效和安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 586-591.
[9] 潘立超, 王兆海, 谭向龙, 张煊, 刘荣. 肝脏肿瘤切除日归手术临床分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 21-24.
[10] 朱轩逸, 赵一腾, 刘连新, 朱泽斌, 张树庚. 腹腔镜肝移植混合手术的关键技术应用现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 56-59.
[11] 张宇涵, 吴添庆, 高汶卿, 郑梽楷, 贺珉睿, 周仲国. 不可切除性肝内胆管癌不同治疗方式疗效和安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 939-947.
[12] 李鹏, 赵成亮, 曾祥瑞, 王斐, 杨菲. PELD术中选择单侧入路三根减压治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效与安全性的前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 351-358.
[13] 王艺, 程美雄, 徐如祥, 张天, 吴娅秋. Neuroform Atlas支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内宽颈动脉瘤的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 92-99.
[14] 王晨冉, 江学良. 英夫利西单抗生物类似物与原研药治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性比较:真实世界队列分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 26-30.
[15] 杨苗苗, 李菲, 宫文静, 刘颍. 经肱动脉入路行动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝癌患者的舒适性、安全性及疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 81-88.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?