切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 183 -186. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2026.02.022

论著

高危急性化脓性胆囊炎经肝胆囊穿刺引流术后择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术最佳时间的选择
陆颖超, 黄锦山, 徐红星, 沈丹枫()   
  1. 215400 江苏苏州,江苏省太仓市第一人民医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-15 出版日期:2026-04-26
  • 通信作者: 沈丹枫

Selection of the optimal timing for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in patients with high-risk acute suppurative cholecystitis

Yingchao Lu, Jinshan Huang, Hongxing Xu, Danfeng Shen()   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First People’s Hospital of Taicang City Jiangsu Province, Suzhou Jiangsu Province 215400, China
  • Received:2025-02-15 Published:2026-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Danfeng Shen
  • Supported by:
    Taicang Science and Technology Program Project(TC2020JCYL27); Clinical Research Project of Taicang First People’s Hospital(2025-TCYYIIT-01)
引用本文:

陆颖超, 黄锦山, 徐红星, 沈丹枫. 高危急性化脓性胆囊炎经肝胆囊穿刺引流术后择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术最佳时间的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 183-186.

Yingchao Lu, Jinshan Huang, Hongxing Xu, Danfeng Shen. Selection of the optimal timing for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in patients with high-risk acute suppurative cholecystitis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(02): 183-186.

目的

探讨高危急性化脓性胆囊炎(ASC)经肝胆囊穿刺引流术(PTGD)后择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的最佳时间选择。

方法

回顾性选取我院2016年9月至2022年3月高危ASC患者206例为研究对象,根据PTGD与LC(PTGD-LC)间隔时间分为早期LC组(4w≤PTGD-LC<6w,n=96例)和晚期LC组(6w≤PTGD-LC<8w,n=110例)。采用SPSS 21.0统计学软件处理数据,两组患者手术前后36条简明健康状况调查表(SF-36)评分、手术时间、出血量,术后排气时间、进食时间、引流管拔除时间及住院时间用(±s)表示,行t检验;术中胆囊部分切除率、胆囊周围严重粘连率、中转开腹率及术后并发症发生率、疼痛评分组间比较采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

早期LC组患者手术时间、术后排气时间、术后进食时间、引流管拔除时间、住院时间大于晚期LC组(均P<0.05);术中出血量、中转开腹率及胆囊周围严重粘连率大于晚期LC组(均P<0.05);SF-36评分差于晚期LC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组胆囊部分切除率、并发症发生率及术后疼痛评分比较无显著差异(均P>0.05)。

结论

PTGD术后6~8周行LC术可缩短手术时间,缩短患者住院时间,有利于高危ASC患者生活质量的提高。

Objective

To explore the optimal timing for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGD) in patients with high-risk acute suppurative cholecystitis (ASC).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 206 patients with high-risk ASC who were treated in our hospital from September 2016 to March 2022. According to the interval between PTGD and LC (PTGD-LC interval), the patients were divided into the early LC group (4 weeks≤PTGD-LC interval<6 weeks, n=96 cases) and the late LC group (6 weeks≤PTGD-LC interval<8 weeks, n=110 cases). Statistical software SPSS 21.0 was used for data analysis. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores (before and after surgery), operation time, blood loss, postoperative time to first flatus, postoperative time to oral intake, drainage tube removal time, and length of hospital stay in the two groups were expressed as (±s) and analyzed by t test. The rates of partial cholecystectomy, severe pericholecystic adhesion, conversion to open surgery, postoperative complication rate, and pain scores were compared between the two groups using the χ2 test. A P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The operation time, postoperative time to first flatus, postoperative time to oral intake, drainage tube removal time, and length of hospital stay in the early LC group were longer than those in the late LC group (all P<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, conversion rate to open surgery, and rate of severe pericholecystic adhesion in the early LC group were higher than those in the late LC group (all P<0.05). The SF-36 score in the early LC group was worse than that in the late LC group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the rate of partial cholecystectomy, postoperative complication rate, or postoperative pain score between the two groups (all P>0.05).

Conclusion

Performing LC 6–8 weeks after PTGD can shorten the operation time and length of hospital stay, and is conducive to improving the quality of life of patients with high-risk ASC.

表1 两组高危急性化脓性胆囊炎手术患者一般资料对比
表2 两组高危急性化脓性胆囊炎手术患者术中指标比较
表3 两组高危急性化脓性胆囊炎手术患者术后指标比较
表4 两组高危急性化脓性胆囊炎手术患者SF-36评分情况比较(分,±s
[1]
范伟强, 杨彦, 韩霖,等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在胆囊动脉变异患者的临床效果研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 318-321.
[2]
吴永哲, 李华志, 吴畏, 等. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗合并胆囊管结石嵌顿的急性胆囊炎疗效观察[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2022, 27(10): 791-794.
[3]
黄庆勇,牛彦锋,陈怡发,等. "三镜"联合在胆囊结石伴肝外胆管结石中的应用价值[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 303-305.
[4]
Cai S, Ma X. Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage Versus Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2021, 32(11): 945-955.
[5]
章伟,张文俊. 经皮穿肝胆道引流序贯腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗高龄急性化脓性胆囊炎临床观察[J]. 解放军医药杂志, 2022, 34(09): 47-49, 59.
[6]
刘诗哲. 超声引导经皮经肝胆囊穿刺置管引流术联合延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗老年急性结石性胆囊炎的临床效果[J]. 河南外科学杂志, 2022, 28(06): 127-129.
[7]
邹玉锋, 解宏伟, 李溪, 等. 急性胆囊炎穿刺引流术后腹腔镜胆囊切除术的时机探讨[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2022, 27(08): 602-606.
[8]
陈炜枫. 急性重症胆囊炎患者PTGD后LC手术时机的病例对照试验[D]. 南方医科大学,2022.
[9]
Yamada K, Yamashita Y, Yamada T, et al. Optimal timing for performing percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and subsequent cholecystectomy for better management of acute cholecystitis [J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2015, 22(12): 855-861.
[10]
陈达伟, 张芳霞, 刘双海. 经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术时机[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2021, 33(01): 3.
[11]
Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, et al. The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients [J]. Pain 2005, 117(03): 412-420.
[12]
高添铭, 蒋国庆, 丁向民. 老年急性化脓性胆囊炎的诊断和治疗进展[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2022, 49(12): 832-835.
[13]
张宏娜, 程艳丽. 结肠息肉内镜切除术后并发急性胆囊炎胆囊坏疽穿孔1例[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2020, 20(07): 667-669.
[14]
李玥铭, 李璐, 蒲猛, 等. 超声引导下经皮经肝胆囊穿刺置管引流术在治疗老老年急性胆囊炎的临床价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2023, 39(05): 536-539.
[15]
李昌旭, 李学民, 梁占强, 等. 吲哚菁绿荧光导航在老年急性胆囊炎患者经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术后腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2023, 39(04): 885-891
[16]
殷鑫, 刘翀, 何静妮, 等. 急性胆囊炎经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术后择期腔镜胆囊切除术最佳时间的选择[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2022, 31(02): 176-183.
[17]
姜海, 李磊, 窦贺贺, 等. 高危急性胆囊炎PTGD后行LC时机选择及手术延期的影响因素[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2023, 48(08): 1040-1044.
[18]
Warchałowski Ł, Łuszczki E, Bartosiewicz A, et al. The Analysis of Risk Factors in the Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(20): 7571.
[19]
Sakamoto T, Fujiogi M, Matsui H, et al. Timing of cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: a nationwide inpatient database study [J]. HPB (Oxford), 2020, 22(06): 920-926.
[20]
杜彦霖, 崔永, 蔡先启, 等. 肺癌手术患者术前焦虑或抑郁的影响因素分析[J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2020, 23(07): 568-572.
[1] 贺智恒, 姚德炯, 孙东方. 腹腔镜下胆囊切除术后胆瘘影响因素分析及风险预测模型的构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 175-178.
[2] 向涵, 母德安, 王强, 黄英杰, 张伟. 3D荧光反染超微创单孔腹腔镜Ⅵ段、Ⅴ段背侧段解剖性肝切除[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 610-610.
[3] 张丹, 刘凌云, 蒋童新, 尚培中, 张腾花, 史雪萍, 左利媛. 具有5种罕少特征的胆囊腹腔镜切除一例报道[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 353-354.
[4] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 不同路径腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的近中期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 317-320.
[5] 刘伟博, 李林, 张玉斌. ERAS理念下的经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术对患者术后恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 278-281.
[6] 张伟, 尚丹丹, 尚培中, 李晓武, 苗建军, 刘冰. 腹腔镜术中应用壶腹钟表定位法和胆囊废弃术治疗80岁以上急性胆囊炎[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 188-191.
[7] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 梅鑫, 张世科, 张巧珍, 吴文起. 前列腺增生导致下尿路症状手术时机的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 96-99.
[10] 费振浩, 邱章华, 孙志为, 王峻峰, 陈业盛, 唐建中. 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合脐疝修补术经验分享[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 270-273.
[11] 刘春熠, 孙齐, 史中巍, 黄静. 日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后恶心呕吐的影响因素与防治[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 245-249.
[12] 王孜尧, 柯能文. 慢性胰腺炎手术治疗时机与手术方式选择[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 466-471.
[13] 彭子洋, 王志博, 王丹, 彭浩茜, 王蕾, 彭薇, 王娟娟, 李宇, 刘学民, 吴荣谦, 向俊西, 吕毅. 智能化辅助图像实时去雾技术在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 328-333.
[14] 张天献, 吕云福, 郑进方. LC+LCBDE与ERCP/EST+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石效果Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 45-50.
[15] 王晓栋, 蔡凤军, 白燕萍, 杨永生. ICG荧光导航在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中应用的关键问题探讨[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 16-20.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?