切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 434 -437. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.04.022.

论著

单切口腹腔镜下胃癌根治术治疗早中期胃癌的疗效观察
杨维军1, 张文文2, 付凯1,()   
  1. 1. 210006 南京,南京医科大学附属南京医院(南京市第一医院)普外科
    2. 210006 南京,南京医科大学附属南京医院(南京市第一医院)肿瘤内科
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-27 出版日期:2025-08-26
  • 通信作者: 付凯
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省科技-青年基金项目(BK20180133)

Efficacy observation of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with single incision in the treatment of early and middle-stage gastric cancer

Weijun Yang1, Wenwen Zhang2, Kai Fu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, NanJing First Hospital, NanJing Medical University(NanJing First Hospital), Nanjing Jiangsu Province 210006, China
    2. Department of Oncology, NanJing First Hospital, NanJing Medical University(NanJing First Hospital), Nanjing Jiangsu Province 210006, China
  • Received:2025-03-27 Published:2025-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Kai Fu
引用本文:

杨维军, 张文文, 付凯. 单切口腹腔镜下胃癌根治术治疗早中期胃癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 434-437.

Weijun Yang, Wenwen Zhang, Kai Fu. Efficacy observation of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with single incision in the treatment of early and middle-stage gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 434-437.

目的

探讨单切口腹腔镜下胃癌根治术治疗早中期胃癌的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2021年6月至2024年6月150例早中期胃癌患者资料,将86例行单切口腹腔镜下胃癌根治术的患者纳入单孔组,64例行传统五孔腹腔镜下胃癌根治术的患者纳入多孔组。采用SPSS 25.0统计软件分析数据,胃肠激素指标、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)及焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分等计量资料以()表示,行独立样本t检验;术后并发症发生情况等计数资料行χ2检验。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

单孔组患者手术时间长于多孔组、术中出血量少于多孔组、首次排气时间短于多孔组(P<0.05),但两组患者淋巴结清扫数、住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后2d,两组患者血清胃动素(MOT)、胃泌素(GAS)水平均较术前降低,但单孔组高于多孔组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后并发症总发生率比较无差异(P>0.05)。两组患者术后7d VAS评分比较无差异(P>0.05);单孔组术后7d SAS评分低于多孔组(P<0.05)。

结论

较传统多孔腹腔镜根治术,单切口腹腔镜下胃癌根治术虽然手术时间较长,但术中出血少,患者术后胃肠功能恢复快,且不影响淋巴结清扫,可减轻患者术后焦虑程度。

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with a single incision in the treatment of early and middle-stage gastric cancer.

Methods

The data of 150 patients with early and middle-stage gastric cancer from June 2021 to June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. 86 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with a single incision were included in the single-port group, and 64 patients who underwent traditional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with five ports were included in the multi-port group. The SPSS 25.0 statistical software was used to analyze the data. Measurement data such as gastrointestinal hormone indexes, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS) scores were expressed as (), and independent sample t test was performed; χ2 tests were performed on count data such as the occurrence of postoperative complications. P<0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

The operation time of patients in the single-port group was longer than that in the multiport group, the intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the multi-port group, and the first exhaust time was shorter than that in the multi-port group (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of lymph node dissections and the length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). Two days after the operation, the levels of serum motilin (MOT) and gastrin (GAS) in both groups were lower than those before the operation, but those in the single-port group were higher than those in the multi-port group(P<0.05). There was no difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05). There was no difference in the VAS scores between the two groups 7 days after the operation (P>0.05);the SAS score of the single-port group 7 days after the operation was lower than that of the multi-port group(P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the traditional multi-port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, although the operation time of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with a single incision is longer, the intraoperative blood loss is less, the postoperative gastrointestinal function of patients recovers faster, and it does not affect the lymph node dissection. It can reduce the degree of postoperative anxiety of patients.

表1 两组早中期胃癌手术患者一般资料比较
表2 两组早中期胃癌手术患者围手术期指标比较(
表3 两组早中期胃癌手术患者胃肠激素水平比较(ng/L,
表4 两组早中期胃癌手术患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表5 两组早中期胃癌手术患者术后7d疼痛及焦虑情况比较(分,
[1]
郑广涛,黄河,文西年,等. 开放与腹腔镜全胃联合胰体尾、脾切除术治疗T4b期胃癌的近中期疗效比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022, 16(01): 84-86.
[2]
Jia Q, Ma Z, Wang Y, et al. Integrated single-step terahertz metasensing for simultaneous detection based on exosomal membrane proteins enables pathological typing of gastric cancer [J].Research, 2025, 8: 625.
[3]
叶小双,林夏,刘佳佳,等. 腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术非离断Roux-en-Y吻合与毕Ⅱ+Braun吻合的临床疗效及生活质量的比较[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2022, 25(02): 166-172.
[4]
邢丽丽,于恩彦,俞晓军,等. 单孔与多孔腹腔镜胃癌根治术后早期患者焦虑情绪、生活质量的对比研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2023, 28(01): 46-49.
[5]
Lee B, Lee YT, Park YS, et al. Learning curve of pure single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. JGC, 2018,18(02): 182-188.
[6]
陈孝平,汪建平,赵继宗. 外科学(第9版)[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018: 346-349.
[7]
Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual[M]. 8th ed. New York: Springer, 2016: 203-220.
[8]
段泉泉,胜利. 焦虑及抑郁自评量表的临床效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,2012, 26(09): 676-679.
[9]
孙兵,车晓明. 视觉模拟评分法(VAS)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志,2012, 28(06): 645.
[10]
马博,周军,李建刚,等. 单孔+1孔腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术的安全性评价[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2021,15(06): 653-656.
[11]
袁浩,黎爽,贾贵清,等. 单孔+1吲哚菁绿荧光示踪全腹腔镜胃癌根治术应用体会[J]. 四川医学,2023, 44(08): 856-860.
[12]
刘文居,刘声源,王志纬,等. 改良单孔平台在单孔plus腹腔镜全胃切除食管空肠管状吻合术中应用研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2023, 43(09): 1027-1032.
[13]
杨建军,侯栋升,董文培,等. 应用胃悬吊技术行单孔腹腔镜胃袖状切除术围手术期疗效对比研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2023, 43(05): 562-565.
[14]
吴芳,章笑,钱振渊,等. 经小切口Roux-en-Y吻合在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术中的应用研究[J]. 中国医师杂志,2023,25(10): 1453-1457.
[15]
阎芳,李格林,李德亮,等. 腹腔镜辅助小切口胃癌根治术对进展期胃癌患者手术相关指标及术后胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 实用癌症杂志,2023, 38(10):1702-1705.
[16]
代佑果,梁丙乾,王嘉鑫,等. 多关节内镜手控器械辅助纯单孔腹腔镜远端胃癌D 2根治术[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2024,27(04): 382.
[17]
燕速,郑民华. 中国单孔及减孔腹腔镜胃癌手术实践[J]. 外科理论与实践,2023, 28(03): 233-239.
[1] 李涛, 朱含放, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前右侧腹股沟疝修补术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 366-366.
[2] 李凯, 母德安, 陈淋, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创钳辅助经脐单孔腹腔镜肝右前叶切除[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 367-367.
[3] 王浩瑜, 杨拴元, 任彦顺, 阴志强. 两种改良食管空肠吻合术的腹腔镜全胃切除术中临床对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 425-428.
[4] 林炳涛, 陈君填. 不同病理类型进展期胃癌患者临床特征及腹腔镜辅助根治术后短期预后的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 429-433.
[5] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 我国腹腔镜疝外科治疗现状、问题与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 355-358.
[6] 田文, 杨晓冬. 我国腹腔镜疝手术治疗难点与对策[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 359-361.
[7] 李涛, 朱含放, 李世拥. 我国腹腔镜疝修补术式选择与原则[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 362-365.
[8] 朱永慧, 桑迪, 张翠翠. 改良后腹膜优先原位LPD对壶腹部周围癌区域淋巴结清扫和并发症的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 372-375.
[9] 张光亚, 方荣喜, 吴鹏, 肖虎. 腹腔镜下不同入肝血流阻断肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 376-379.
[10] 宁国龙, 左伟, 侯强强. 两种不同手术方案治疗Meckel憩室肠重复畸形患儿的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 380-383.
[11] 赵军抗, 张前进, 庄惠杰. 不同导向解剖入路腹腔镜根治术治疗早期直肠癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 401-404.
[12] 雷世杰, 胡饶, 彭鸿, 马俊伟, 高石亮, 晏科金. 头侧-中央混合入路腹腔镜根治术治疗右半结肠癌的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 417-420.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜解剖性完全左半肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 639-639.
[14] 母德安, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 张氏超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜左三叶肝切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 640-640.
[15] 焦振东, 金上博. 腹腔镜肝癌切除术治疗肝癌破裂出血[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 641-641.
阅读次数
全文


摘要