切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 401 -404. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.04.014.

论著

不同导向解剖入路腹腔镜根治术治疗早期直肠癌的临床对比
赵军抗1, 张前进1, 庄惠杰1,()   
  1. 1. 221000 江苏徐州,徐州市中心医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-02 出版日期:2025-08-26
  • 通信作者: 庄惠杰
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫生健康委员会项目(LKM2022062)

Clinical comparison of laparoscopic radical surgery with different guided anatomical approaches for the treatment of early rectal cancer

Junkang Zhao1, Qianjin Zhang1, Huijie Zhuang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Jiangsu Province 221000, China
  • Received:2024-07-02 Published:2025-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Huijie Zhuang
引用本文:

赵军抗, 张前进, 庄惠杰. 不同导向解剖入路腹腔镜根治术治疗早期直肠癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 401-404.

Junkang Zhao, Qianjin Zhang, Huijie Zhuang. Clinical comparison of laparoscopic radical surgery with different guided anatomical approaches for the treatment of early rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 401-404.

目的

比较不同导向解剖入路腹腔镜根治术治疗早期直肠癌的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2021年1月至2023年12月行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的101例早期直肠癌患者资料,依据手术选择的解剖入路不同,将53例以自主神经导向行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的患者纳入神经导向组,将48例以血管导向行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的患者纳入血管导向组。采用SPSS 25.0统计软件分析数据,围手术期相关指标、胃肠激素指标以()表示,行独立样本t检验;排尿功能障碍发生情况行χ2检验,排尿功能分级采用秩和检验。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

神经导向组患者术中出血量少于血管导向组、首次排气时间短于血管导向组(P<0.05);两组患者手术时间、淋巴结清扫数目、住院时间比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。术后2d,两组患者血清血清胃泌素(GAS)、胃动素(MOT)均较术前降低,但神经导向组血清GAS、MOT水平高于血管导向组(P<0.05)。术后7d,神经导向组排尿功能分级优于血管导向组,术后排尿功能障碍发生率(18.7%)低于血管导向组(39.6%)(P<0.05)。

结论

以自主神经导向及血管导向行腹腔镜根治术治疗早期直肠癌均有较好的临床效果,但前者术中出血量少,患者术后肠道功能恢复快,可减少术后排尿功能障碍发生。

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical surgery with different guided anatomical approaches in the treatment of early rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 101 patients with early rectal cancer who underwent surgical treatment and follow-up at the hospital from January 2021 to December 2023. The patients underwent laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery. According to the different anatomical approaches chosen for surgery, 53 patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer radical surgery under autonomous nerve guidance were included in the nerve guided group, while the remaining 48 patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer radical surgery under vascular guidance were included in the vascular guided group. SPSS 25.0 statistical software was used to analyze the data. Perioperative related indicators and gastrointestinal hormone indicators were expressed as (), and independent sample t tests were performed. The occurrence of urinary dysfunction was analyzed using χ2 test, and the grading of urinary function was performed using a Rank Sum test. P<0.05 indicated a statistical significant difference.

Results

The intraoperative bleeding volume in the nerve guided group was less than that in the vascular guided group, and the first exhaust time was shorter than that in the vascular guided group,with statistical significant differences (P<0.05). There was no statistical significant difference in surgical time,lymph node dissection count, and hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). On the 2nd day after surgery,the serum GAS and MOT levels in both groups decreased compared to before surgery, but the serum GAS and MOT levels in the nerve guided group were higher than those in the vascular guided group, with statistical significant differences (P<0.05). At 7 days after surgery, the urinary function grading of the nerve guided group was better than that of the vascular guided group, and the incidence of postoperative urinary dysfunction (18.7%)was lower than that of the vascular guided group (39.6%), with statistical significant differences (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Both autonomous nerve guided and vascular guided laparoscopic radical surgery have good clinical effects in the treatment of early rectal cancer. However, the former has less intraoperative bleeding,faster postoperative intestinal function recovery, and can reduce postoperative urinary dysfunction.

表1 两组早期直肠癌手术患者一般资料比较
表2 两组早期直肠癌手术患者围手术期指标比较(
表3 两组早期直肠癌手术患者胃肠激素水平比较(ng/L,
表4 两组早期直肠癌手术患者术后排尿功能障碍情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
付占威,蔡正昊,马君俊. 人工智能在直肠癌外科精准化诊疗中的应用价值[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2024, 27(06): 574-578.
[2]
岳德亮,王道岭,刘宇,等. 直肠癌经肛全直肠系膜切除术后生活质量变化及低位前切除综合征发生风险分析[J]. 肿瘤学杂志,2022, 28(04): 310-314.
[3]
姚宏伟,安勇博,王权,等. 腹腔镜辅助经肛全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌近期疗效的前瞻性和多中心病例登记研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2021, 20(12): 1351-1357.
[4]
赵强,冯树森,张东成,等. 保留盆腔自主神经的腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术在男性直肠癌患者中的应用[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志,2021, 15(05): 539-541.
[5]
白明瀚,孙凌宇,郑宏群,等. 基于膜解剖理论的全直肠系膜切除层面显露与筋膜辨识[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2023,43(10): 1188-1195, 1200.
[6]
陈孝平,汪建平,赵继宗. 外科学(第9版)[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018: 390-394.
[7]
中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会结直肠外科医师委员会,等. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术操作指南(2018版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2018, 17(09): 877-885.
[8]
Saito N, Sarashina H, Nunomura M, et al. Clinical evaluation ofnerve-sparing surgery combined with preoperative radiotherapy in advanced rectal cancer patients[J]. Am J Surg , 1998, 175(4):277-282.
[9]
孙跃明,封益飞. 多技术整合在中低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除手术中的应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2024, 27(06): 579-582.
[10]
邓少博,许长录,阎海. 手套通路经肛全直肠系膜切除术与传统术式在直肠癌根治术中的应用效果及对患者术后排便功能的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志,2022, 28(06): 33-40.
[11]
邓文宏,郑勇斌,童仕伦,等. 基于神经层面指引的腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术功能保护效果分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2019, 22(12): 1144-1151.
[12]
赵波,陈文瑾,陈永军,等. 自主神经导向与血管导向解剖入路在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中应用效果对比观察[J]. 山东医药,2022, 62(08): 47-50.
[13]
吴胜伟,吴晓翔,王志伟. 保留盆腔自主神经的腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术对女性直肠癌患者术后复发及排尿和性生活质量的影响[J]. 新乡医学院学报,2022, 39(06): 519-522.
[14]
李凯,郑勇斌,童仕伦,等. 神经层面在腹腔镜直肠癌手术中对盆腔自主神经保护的意义[J]. 腹部外科,2022, 35(03):224-227.
[15]
王治杰,刘正,梁建伟,等. 筋膜导向与血管导向解剖入路行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的疗效对比分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2021, 24(07): 611-618.
[16]
王雄飞,邵建平,赵磊,等. 腹腔镜下PANP+TME与TME对男性直肠癌术后排尿、性功能的保护效果研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志,2022, 16(01): 22-26.
[1] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 我国腹腔镜疝外科治疗现状、问题与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 355-358.
[2] 田文, 杨晓冬. 我国腹腔镜疝手术治疗难点与对策[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 359-361.
[3] 李涛, 朱含放, 李世拥. 我国腹腔镜疝修补术式选择与原则[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 362-365.
[4] 朱永慧, 桑迪, 张翠翠. 改良后腹膜优先原位LPD对壶腹部周围癌区域淋巴结清扫和并发症的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 372-375.
[5] 张光亚, 方荣喜, 吴鹏, 肖虎. 腹腔镜下不同入肝血流阻断肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 376-379.
[6] 宁国龙, 左伟, 侯强强. 两种不同手术方案治疗Meckel憩室肠重复畸形患儿的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 380-383.
[7] 梁承友, 刘翼, 姚德炯, 朱明, 廖介. 三角入路在局部晚期直肠癌盆腔脏器联合切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 392-395.
[8] 李涛, 朱含放, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前右侧腹股沟疝修补术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 366-366.
[9] 李凯, 母德安, 陈淋, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创钳辅助经脐单孔腹腔镜肝右前叶切除[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 367-367.
[10] 沈锋, 王葵, 刘建伟. 我国腹腔镜肝癌手术治疗现状、问题与发展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 237-240.
[11] 庞名扬, 魏勇, 刘威, 胡海斌, 杨健, 蒋荣江, 朱清毅, 沈露明. 经腹膜后途径单孔与多孔腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 335-339.
[12] 黄展森, 徐锦斌, 黄群雄, 李腾成, 狄金明. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第22期)——ACTH非依赖性双侧肾上腺增生[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 384-389.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜解剖性完全左半肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 639-639.
[14] 母德安, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 张氏超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜左三叶肝切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 640-640.
[15] 焦振东, 金上博. 腹腔镜肝癌切除术治疗肝癌破裂出血[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 641-641.
阅读次数
全文


摘要