切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 384 -387. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.04.010.

论著

肝内胆管结石不同微创手术方式的临床研究
张腾1, 韩威1,(), 冯章东1   
  1. 1. 101199 北京,首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-20 出版日期:2025-08-26
  • 通信作者: 韩威
  • 基金资助:
    2024年度北京市通州区科技计划项目(KJ2024CX034)

Clinical study on different minimally invasive surgical approaches for intrahepatic cholangiolithiasis

Teng Zhang1, Wei Han1,(), Zhangdong Feng1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101199, China
  • Received:2025-02-20 Published:2025-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Wei Han
引用本文:

张腾, 韩威, 冯章东. 肝内胆管结石不同微创手术方式的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 384-387.

Teng Zhang, Wei Han, Zhangdong Feng. Clinical study on different minimally invasive surgical approaches for intrahepatic cholangiolithiasis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 384-387.

目的

探讨腹腔镜肝部分切除术(LPH)与腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术(LCBDE)治疗肝内胆管结石的临床效果。

方法

回顾性选取2014年4月至2020年3月88例肝内胆管结石患者,根据采取手术方式的不同分为LPH组(n=46例,行LPH)和LCBDE组(n=42例,行LCBDE)。采用SPSS27.0统计学软件处理数据,计量资料均符合正态分布用()表示,组间、组内比较分别用独立样本t、配对样本t检验;计数资料用[例(%)]表示,行χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

与LCBDE组比较,LPH组患者手术时间更长、术中出血量更多(P<0.05);两组患者术后1d、3d的丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天门冬氨酸转移酶(AST)、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(γ-GGT)、总胆红素(TBIL)均较术前升高(P<0.05),且LPH组上述指标更高(P<0.05);LPH组与LCBDE组患者术后并发症总发生率无明显差异(P>0.05);与LCBDE组比较,LPH组患者术后结石残余率更低(P<0.05);术后随访36个月,两组患者复发率比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。

结论

不同的微创手术方式治疗肝内胆管结石均可获得较好的效果,LCBDE在微创方面更具优势,但在降低术中结石残余率方面不及LPH,因此临床上应当根据患者实际情况,选择个性化的治疗方案。

Objective

To explore the clinical effects of laparoscopic partial hepatectomy (LPH)and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and stone removal (LCBDE) in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiolithiasis.

Methods

A total of 88 patients with intrahepatic cholangiolithiasis from April 2014 to March 2020 were retrospectively selected. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into the LPH group (n=46 cases, undergoing LPH) and the LCBDE group (n=42 cases, undergoing LCBDE).The SPSS27.0 statistical software was used to process the data. Measurement data conforming to the normal distribution were expressed as (). Independent sample t tests were used for comparisons between groups,and paired sample t tests were used for comparisons within groups. Enumeration data were expressed as[ cases(%)], and χ2 tests were performed. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Compared with the LCBDE group, the patients in the LPH group had a longer operation time and more intraoperative blood loss (P<0.05). The levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GGT), and total bilirubin (TBIL) of the patients in both groups were higher than those before the operation at 1 day and 3 days after the operation (P<0.05), and the above indicators in the LPH group were higher (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the LPH group and the LCBDE group (P>0.05). Compared with the LCBDE group,the patients in the LPH group had a lower residual stone rate after the operation (P<0.05). After a 36-month follow-up after the operation, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion

Different minimally invasive surgical methods can achieve good effects in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiolithiasis. LCBDE has more advantages in terms of minimal invasiveness, but it is inferior to LPH in reducing the intraoperative residual stone rate. Therefore, in clinical practice, individualized treatment plans should be selected according to the actual situation of patients.

表1 两组肝内胆管结石手术患者一般资料比较
表2 两组肝内胆管结石手术患者围手术期指标对比
表3 两组肝内胆管结石手术患者肝功能指标比较(
[1]
李依川,彭彬,辛大平. 精准肝切除与非规则性肝切除治疗肝内胆管结石的疗效对比[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018, 12(01): 71-73.
[2]
Kang JH, Noh MY, Yoon HY. Intrahepatic Duct Incision and Closure for the Treatment of Multiple Cholelithiasis in a Dog[J].Vet Sci, 2024, 11(8): 378.
[3]
邹志邈,陈星,李夏,等. 肝内胆管结石影响肝内胆管癌患者手术预后的回顾性分析[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志,2024, 36(06):326-330, 336.
[4]
刘颖斌,陈炜. 肝内胆管结石外科治疗的要点与难点[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2020, 19(08): 808-812.
[5]
张平,李方洪. 肝段或肝叶切除术对肝内胆管结石再次手术效果的影响[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(01): 83-85.
[6]
Pan SB, Wu CL, Zhou DC, et al. Total laparoscopic partial hepatectomy versus open partial hepatectomy for primary leftsided hepatolithiasis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[ J]. Trials, 2024, 25(1): 137.
[7]
颜喆,陆品相,沈玉根,等. 胆总管切开取石术后结石的残留情况及其影响因素[J]. 复旦学报(医学版),2021, 48(04): 532-535.
[8]
Chiu BY, Chuang SH, Chuang SC, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration to treat choledocholithiasis in situs inversus patients: A technical review[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2023, 11(9):1939-1950.
[9]
中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组.肝胆管结石病诊断治疗指南[J].中华消化外科杂志,2007, 6(02): 156-161.
[10]
张宝华,张永杰,张柏和,等. 术后胆漏的综合处理[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2002, 22(02): 106-107.
[11]
王勇,彭鹏,邓如兵,等. 两种术式治疗左半肝内胆管结石的2年随访分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2020,14(06): 590-592.
[12]
张诚,何川琦,孔祥余,等. 经皮肝穿刺胆管引流联合经皮空肠穿刺引流治疗胆总管囊肿切除术后肝内胆管结石[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志,2024, 36(08): 468-471, 490.
[13]
江振辉,程斌,周腾. 腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复杂性肝内胆管结石的疗效分析[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2023, 33(17): 89-93.
[14]
Panettieri E, Vega EA, Chirban AM, et al. Anatomic Laparoscopic Partial Hepatectomy of a Segment 4a B-Catenin Mutated Adenoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2023, 30(7): 4234-4235.
[15]
Marks B, Al Samaraee A. Laparoscopic Exploration of the Common Bile Duct: A Systematic Review of the Published Evidence Over the Last 10 Years[ J]. Am Surg, 2021, 87(3): 404-418.
[16]
Okura K, Seo S, Shimizu H, et al. Primary hepatic extranodal marginal zone B-cell mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma treated by laparoscopic partial hepatectomy: a case report[ J]. Surg Case Rep, 2023, 9(1): 29.
[17]
金俊红,项建斌,李永宏,等. 消炎利胆片联合双镜微创手术治疗肝内胆管结石疗效观察[J]. 西部中医药,2020, 33(11):105-108.
[18]
彭建,郭鑫. 腹腔镜肝切除联合术中胆道镜治疗左肝内胆管结石56例临床分析[J]. 实用医院临床杂志,2019, 16(05):207-209.
[1] 王浩瑜, 杨拴元, 任彦顺, 阴志强. 两种改良食管空肠吻合术的腹腔镜全胃切除术中临床对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 425-428.
[2] 林炳涛, 陈君填. 不同病理类型进展期胃癌患者临床特征及腹腔镜辅助根治术后短期预后的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 429-433.
[3] 杨维军, 张文文, 付凯. 单切口腹腔镜下胃癌根治术治疗早中期胃癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 434-437.
[4] 党立力, 张流, 周鹏, 周华友, 赵伟. 保留左结肠动脉(升支)腹腔镜直肠癌全系膜切除术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 442-445.
[5] 黎伟忠, 黎嘉历, 张映南, 莫灿荣. 改良Glisson鞘外阻断在腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 453-456.
[6] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 我国腹腔镜疝外科治疗现状、问题与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 355-358.
[7] 田文, 杨晓冬. 我国腹腔镜疝手术治疗难点与对策[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 359-361.
[8] 李涛, 朱含放, 李世拥. 我国腹腔镜疝修补术式选择与原则[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 362-365.
[9] 朱永慧, 桑迪, 张翠翠. 改良后腹膜优先原位LPD对壶腹部周围癌区域淋巴结清扫和并发症的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 372-375.
[10] 张光亚, 方荣喜, 吴鹏, 肖虎. 腹腔镜下不同入肝血流阻断肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 376-379.
[11] 宁国龙, 左伟, 侯强强. 两种不同手术方案治疗Meckel憩室肠重复畸形患儿的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 380-383.
[12] 赵军抗, 张前进, 庄惠杰. 不同导向解剖入路腹腔镜根治术治疗早期直肠癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 401-404.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜解剖性完全左半肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 639-639.
[14] 母德安, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 张氏超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜左三叶肝切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 640-640.
[15] 焦振东, 金上博. 腹腔镜肝癌切除术治疗肝癌破裂出血[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 641-641.
阅读次数
全文


摘要