切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 309 -312. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.03.021.

论著

进展期右半结肠癌CME+D3根治术中不同淋巴结清扫范围的临床研究
徐伯群1, 单留群2,(), 高志慧1   
  1. 1. 226400 江苏南通,南通大学杏林学院附属如东医院普通外科
    2. 210003 南京,南京市第二医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-27 出版日期:2025-06-26
  • 通信作者: 单留群
  • 基金资助:
    南通市卫生健康委员会科研课题 (MSZ2023084)

Clinical study of different lymph node dissection scopes in complete mesocolic excision (CME) plus D3 radical resection for advanced right-sided colon cancer

Boqun Xu1, Liuqun Shan2,(), Zhihui Gao1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery,Rudong Hospital Affiliated to Xinglin College,Nantong University,Nantong Jiangsu 226400,China
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Nanjing Second Hospital,Nanjing Jiangsu Province 210003,China
  • Received:2024-05-27 Published:2025-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Liuqun Shan
引用本文:

徐伯群, 单留群, 高志慧. 进展期右半结肠癌CME+D3根治术中不同淋巴结清扫范围的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 309-312.

Boqun Xu, Liuqun Shan, Zhihui Gao. Clinical study of different lymph node dissection scopes in complete mesocolic excision (CME) plus D3 radical resection for advanced right-sided colon cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(03): 309-312.

目的

探究以肠系膜上动脉(SMA)为内侧界的CME+D3根治术在进展期结肠癌患者中的临床效果。

方法

选取2020年1月至2023年12月62例进展期右半结肠癌行CME+D3根治术患者为研究对象。用随机数字表法分为对照组(n=31例)和观察组(n=31例),对照组以肠系膜上静脉(SMV)左缘为淋巴结清扫内侧界,观察组以肠系膜上动脉(SMA)左缘为淋巴结清扫内侧界。应用SPSS 27.0统计学软件进行数据分析,围手术期指标、术后病理情况等计量资料用(±s)表示,行独立样本t检验;术后并发症情况用率表示,组间比较用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、住院时间、肿瘤直径与肿瘤分化程度相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组引流管放置时间长于对照组,术后引流量、淋巴结阳性数量与淋巴结清扫总数均多于对照组(P<0.05);对照组与观察组患者术后并发症总发生率对比,差异无统计学意义(19.4% vs. 6.5%,P>0.05);术后2年随访,两组患者累积总生存率对比,差异无统计学意义(87.1% vs. 93.5%,Log-Rankχ2=0.675,P>0.05);观察组患者累积无复发转移生存率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(90.3% vs. 64.5%,Log-Rankχ2=5.453,P<0.05)。

结论

针对进展期右半结肠癌患者,实施CME+D3根治术时,以肠系膜上动脉(SMA)左缘作为淋巴结清扫的内侧界限,可提高淋巴结清扫质量,对提高患者预后有积极意义。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of complete mesocolic excision (CME) plus D3 radical resection with the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) as the medial boundary in patients with advanced colon cancer.

Methods

A total of 62 patients with advanced right-sided colon cancer who underwent CME plus D3 radical resection from January 2020 to December 2023 were selected as the research objects.They were divided into the control group (n=31 cases) and the observation group (n=31 cases) by the random number table method.In the control group,the left edge of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) was taken as the medial boundary of lymph node dissection,while in the observation group,the left edge of the superior mesenteric artery(SMA) was taken as the medial boundary of lymph node dissection.The statistical software SPSS 27.0 was used for data analysis.Measurement data such as perioperative indexes and postoperative pathological conditions were expressed as (±s),and independent samples t test was performed.The incidence of postoperative complications was expressed as a rate,and the chi-square test was used for comparison between groups.A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in operation time,intraoperative blood loss,ventilation time,length of hospital stay,tumor diameter,and degree of tumor differentiation between the two groups (P>0.05).The drainage tube placement time in the observation group was longer than that in the control group,and the postoperative drainage volume,the number of positive lymph nodes,and the total number of dissected lymph nodes were all more than those in the control group (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications between the control group and the observation group (19.4% vs. 6.5%,P>0.05).After a 2-year follow-up,there was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative overall survival rate between the two groups (87.1% vs. 93.5%,Log-Rankχ²=0.675,P>0.05).The cumulative recurrence-free and metastasisfree survival rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant (90.3% vs. 64.5%,Log-Rankχ²=5.453,P<0.05).

Conclusion

For patients with advanced right-sided colon cancer,when performing CME plus D3 radical resection,taking the left edge of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) as the medial boundary of lymph node dissection can improve the quality of lymph node dissection,which is of positive significance for improving the prognosis of patients.

表1 两组进展期右半结肠癌CME+D3根治术患者一般资料比较
表2 两组进展期右半结肠癌CME+D3根治术患者围手术期指标对比(±s
表3 两组进展期右半结肠癌CME+D3根治术患者术后病理情况对比
表4 两组进展期右半结肠癌CME+D3根治术患者术后并发症情况对比[例(%)]
图1 两组进展期右半结肠癌根治术患者术后2 年累计生存率及复发转移率对比 注:A为两组患者术后2年累积总生存率对比;B为两组患者术后2年累积复发转移率对比
[1]
Guan X,Jiao S,Wen R,et al.Optimal examined lymph node number for accurate staging and long-term survival in rectal cancer: a population-based study[J].Int J Surg,2023,109(8):2241-2248.
[2]
Wang L,Song B,Chen Y,et al.D3 lymph node dissection improves the survival outcome in patients with pT2 colorectal cancer[J].Int J Colorectal Dis,2023,38(1): 30.
[3]
Hiranuma C,Ishiyama Y,Hirano Y,et al.D3 lymph node dissection with versus without left colic artery preservation in single-incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid and rectosigmoid cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis[J].Asian J Endosc Surg,2023,16(2): 233-240.
[4]
胡延伟,张红松,范晓彬,等.经自然腔道内镜手术与腹腔镜微创术治疗乙状结肠癌和高位直肠癌的长期随访比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(02): 230-232.
[5]
Sato A,Imaizumi K,Kasajima H,et al.Short- and longterm outcomes of preservation versus ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection for descending colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysi[sJ].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2023 ,408(1): 23.
[6]
中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会结直肠外科专家工作组,等.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术操作指南(2023版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2024,23(01): 10-22.
[7]
Mizuuchi Y,Tanabe Y,Sada M,et al.Relationship between prognostic impact of N3 lymph node metastasis at the root of the feeding artery and location of colon cancer [J].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2023,408(1): 31.
[8]
Kojima T,Hino H,Shiomi A,et al.Long-term outcomes of D2 vs.D3 lymph node dissection for cT2N0M0 colorectal cancer:a multi-institutional retrospective analysis[J].Int J Clin Oncol,2022,27(11): 1717-1724.
[9]
Desouza AL,Kazi MM,Nadkarni S,et al.Complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer: Is D3 lymphadenectomy necessary?[J].Colorectal Dis,2024,26(1): 63-72.
[10]
廖伟林,刁德昌,汪佳豪,等.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术采用淋巴示踪技术引导肠系膜上动脉旁淋巴结清扫的临床意义[J].结直肠肛门外科,2022,28(05): 449-455.
[11]
Nguyen NH,Vu XV,Nguyen VQ,et al.Bach Mai Procedure for complete mesocolic excision,central vascular ligation,and D3 lymphadenectomy in total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a prospective study[J].World J Surg Oncol,2023,21(1): 140.
[12]
Hollis R,Weber KT,Parikh S,et al.Correlation between lymph node size on pathology and metastatic disease in right-sided colon cancer: A retrospective review[J].Surg Oncol,2023,46: 101872.
[13]
王平,张汝一.不同淋巴结清扫内侧界限对右半结肠癌腹腔镜根治术近中期随访评价影响[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(05): 506-509.
[14]
Tsukamoto S,Ouchi A,Komori K,et al.A multicenter prospective observational study of lymph node metastasis patterns and shortterm outcomes of extended lymphadenectomy in right-sided colon cancer[J].Ann Gastroenterol Surg,2023,7(6): 940-948.
[15]
吴岑,俞卫卫.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中以SMA与SMV为淋巴结清扫内界的对比研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(02): 214-217.
[16]
Tsukamoto S,Ouchi A,Komori K,et al.A multicenter prospective observational study of lymph node metastasis patterns and shortterm outcomes of extended lymphadenectomy in right-sided colon cancer[J].Ann Gastroenterol Surg,2023,7(6): 940-948.
[1] 邓崇文, 廖喜望, 施幼雄, 龚俊, 钟洪. 腹腔镜下胃癌D2根治+腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期胃癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 180-183.
[2] 肖建, 肖天保, 陈江, 杨桃, 何峰, 保甜甜, 曹一波, 杨琴, 赵颖. 吲哚菁绿成像技术在保留左结肠动脉的直肠癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 134-137.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[6] 田文. 甲状腺癌功能性根治颈淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 482-482.
[7] 张金华, 赵锁. 早期ICC腹腔镜肝切除术不同淋巴结清扫范围的近远期效果对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 578-581.
[8] 赵淑樱, 张聃. 腹腔镜胃癌外科治疗进展与发展趋势[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 459-462.
[9] 彭程程, 张雅琪. 无充气经腋窝入路腔镜手术治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的临床疗效及对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 442-444.
[10] 国瑀辰, 何亮, 穆剑锋, 巩阳, 王权. 腹腔镜全胃切除中的"胃短先行"脾门淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 250-252.
[11] 郭诗翔, 谭明达, 王槐志. 胰头癌淋巴结清扫再思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 625-628.
[12] 周倜, 吴嘉, 韩方, 徐林伟, 张宇华. 新辅助治疗时代胰腺癌淋巴结清扫研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 634-639.
[13] 李泽航, 雷德桥, 陈贵进, 王长征, 谢正勇. 以筋膜导向解剖入路的直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫在男性直肠癌患者全直肠系膜切除术中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 417-421.
[14] 程玉, 顾晋. ST6GAL2 表达下调促进结肠癌细胞生长和转移的多维度研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(11): 1019-1029.
[15] 刘皖, 赵婷婷, 魏明辉. 铜绿假单胞菌注射液术区注射治疗颈淋巴结清扫术后顽固性高流量乳糜漏二例及文献复习[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(10): 926-930.
阅读次数
全文


摘要