切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 196 -199. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.02.021.

论著

微创取纱垫在高原地区肝破裂二期术中的应用研究
齐普良1, 孙凯华1, 任军帮1, 马丽娜2, 李彩霞1, 田青山3,()   
  1. 1.810000 西宁,青海省人民医院急诊外科
    2.810000 西宁,青海省人民医院急诊ICU
    3.810000 西宁,青海省人民医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-13 出版日期:2025-04-26
  • 通信作者: 田青山
  • 基金资助:
    青海省卫生健康委员会指导性计划课题(2022-wjzdx-15)

Study on the application of minimally invasive gauze pad in the secondary operation of liver rupture in plateau area

Puliang Qi1, Kaihua Sun1, Junbang Ren1, Lina Ma2, Caixia Li1, Qingshan Tian3,()   

  1. 1.Department of Emergency Surgery,Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining Qinghai Province 810000, China
    2.Department of Emergency ICU,Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining Qinghai Province 810000, China
    3.Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining Qinghai Province 810000, China
  • Received:2024-04-13 Published:2025-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Qingshan Tian
引用本文:

齐普良, 孙凯华, 任军帮, 马丽娜, 李彩霞, 田青山. 微创取纱垫在高原地区肝破裂二期术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 196-199.

Puliang Qi, Kaihua Sun, Junbang Ren, Lina Ma, Caixia Li, Qingshan Tian. Study on the application of minimally invasive gauze pad in the secondary operation of liver rupture in plateau area[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(02): 196-199.

目的

分析腹腔镜微创纱垫取出术与传统小切口开腹纱垫取出术在高原地区肝破裂二期手术中应用效果。

方法

选取2017年1月至2022年12月一期行单纯开腹肝周纱垫填塞法止血治疗的创伤性肝脏破裂患者60例,采用随机数字表法随机分为两组,每组患者各30例。对照组行二期传统小切口开腹肝周纱垫取出术,观察组行二期腹腔镜肝周纱垫取出术。采用统计学软件SPSS 23.0分析数据。计数资料以[例(%)]表示,组间比较采用χ2检验;等级计数资料比较采用秩和检验;符合正态分布的计量资料以(± s)表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验。P<0.05表示差异具有统计学意义。

结果

观察组患者手术时间长于对照组,手术出血量、腹壁切口大小、术后住院时间、住院费用及术后1d、3d VAS评分均优于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);与术前比较,两组患者术后白细胞计数(WBC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平均升高,且对照组显著高于观察组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者术后并发症总发生率为10.0%,显著低于对照组的33.3%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

高原地区肝破裂患者二期行腹腔镜纱垫取出术,相比传统小切口开腹手术虽延长了手术时间,但具有出血少、切口小、疼痛轻等微创优势,同时可减轻术后炎症反应,降低并发症发生率,更利于患者术后恢复,具有较高的经济效益和应用价值,值得在临床推广。

Objective

To analyze the effect of minimally invasive laparoscopy and traditional small incision in the second stage of liver rupture in high altitude area.

Methods

A total of 60 patients with traumatic liver rupture who received simple perihepatic gauze packing for hemostasis from January 2017 to December 2022 were selected and divided into two groups by random number table method, with 30 patients in each group.The control group underwent two stage traditional small incision operation and the observation group underwent two stage laparoscopic operation.Statistical software SPSS 23.0 was used to analyze the data.The counting data were presented as[ cases (%)], and the comparison between groups was performed by χ2 test.Rank Sum test was used to compare rank count data.The measurement data conforming to the normal distribution were represented by (± s ), and the independent sample t test was used for comparison between groups.P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

The operation time of observation group was longer than that of control group, and the amount of blood loss, abdominal incision size, postoperative hospitalization time,hospitalization cost and postoperative 1d and 3d VAS scores were all better than those of control group, with statistical significance (P<0.05).Compared with preoperative, postoperative WBC, CRP and IL-6 levels in 2 groups were increased, and control group was significantly higher than observation group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 10.0%, significantly lower than that in the control group (33.3%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with traditional small-incision open surgery, laparoscopic gauze pad extraction in the second stage for patients with liver rupture in plateau areas can prolong the operation time, but it has the advantages of less bleeding, small incision and light pain.At the same time, it can reduce postoperative inflammation, reduce the incidence of complications, and is more conducive to postoperative recovery of patients.It has high economic benefits and application value, and is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 两组肝破裂患者临床资料比较
表2 两组肝破裂患者围手术期指标比较(± s
表3 两组肝破裂患者炎性指标比较(± s
表4 两组肝破裂患者并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
Roberts R, Sheth RA.Hepatic trauma[J].Ann Transl Med, 2021,9(14): 1195.
[2]
Pillai AS, Kumar G, Pillai AK.Hepatic Trauma Interventions[J].Semin Intervent Radiol, 2021, 38(1): 96-104.
[3]
王雄飞, 刘春庆, 高再生, 等.损害控制性手术在交通事故致严重肝破裂伤患者抢救中的应用[J].创伤外科杂志, 2022,24(06): 464-467.
[4]
Soma J, Ishii D, Miyagi H, et al.Damage control surgery for grade IV blunt hepatic injury with multiple organ damage in a child: a case report[ J].Surg Case Rep, 2021, 7(1): 269.
[5]
尚丹丹, 刘燕, 尚培中, 等.外伤性肝破裂的治疗现状[J].河北北方学院学报(自然科学版), 2022, 38(02): 40-45.
[6]
俞士刚, 田佳, 吴铁, 等.损伤控制性手术对创伤性肝破裂患者生存及相关应激指标的影响[J].实用肝脏病杂志, 2021,24(06): 915-918.
[7]
Shafshak TS, Elnemr R.The Visual Analogue Scale Versus Numerical Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Severity and Predicting Disability in Low Back Pain[ J].J Clin Rheumatol, 2021, 27(7):282-285.
[8]
钞焕焕, 王越, 张静, 等.系统化风险前瞻应对体系在肝破裂患者中应用效果观察[J].中华保健医学杂志, 2023, 25(04):387-390.
[9]
Hetherington A, Cardoso FS, Lester ELW, et al.Liver trauma in the intensive care unit[ J].Curr Opin Crit Care, 2022, 28(2): 184-189.
[10]
Villegas W, Vaughan J.Trends in Reduction of Mortality in Liver Trauma[ J].Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am, 2022, 34(3): 351-359.
[11]
仁增罗布, 邰闯, 王月亮, 等.联合术中自体输血治疗外伤性肝尾状叶破裂1例[J].西藏医药, 2022, 43(01): 159-160.
[12]
Hu W, Xu Z, Shen X, et al.Accident-related hepatic trauma in a medical clinical center in eastern China: a cross-sectional stud[yJ].BMC Surg, 2021, 21(1): 16.
[13]
Saviano A, Ojetti V, Zanza C, et al.Liver Trauma: Management in the Emergency Setting and Medico-Legal Implications[J].Diagnostics (Basel), 2022, 12(6): 1456.
[14]
嵇武, 蔡忠良, 戴玮.损伤控制性外科的发展历程和研究进展[J].中国医师杂志, 2021, 23(4): 630-634.
[15]
段建峰, 刘晓晨, 赵喜荣, 等.腹腔镜联合ENBD治疗肝破裂TAE后继发腹腔感染体会[J].肝胆胰外科杂志, 2021, 33(07):434-436.
[1] 肖建, 肖天保, 陈江, 杨桃, 何峰, 保甜甜, 曹一波, 杨琴, 赵颖. 吲哚菁绿成像技术在保留左结肠动脉的直肠癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 134-137.
[2] 金芳, 徐东飞, 尚培中, 张伟, 葛艳丽, 李晓英, 苗建军, 郭伟林. 腹腔镜直肠癌Dixon手术选择性应用超声刀和电钩的效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 142-145.
[3] 周丽君, 王露, 林巧. 腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效及并发症对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 146-148.
[4] 何可可, 顾海扬, 肖姝, 韦琪, 李鑫玉. 腹腔镜保留回盲部右半结肠切除术治疗右半结肠癌的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 149-152.
[5] 陈宝鹤, 张文卓, 王隽. 头尾侧联合入路腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的近中期临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 153-156.
[6] 李贞贞, 王宏刚, 崔丽丽, 缪月琴, 刘万璐. 改良管状胃—食管吻合术在腹腔镜近端胃切除消化道重建中的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 176-179.
[7] 邓崇文, 廖喜望, 施幼雄, 龚俊, 钟洪. 腹腔镜下胃癌D2根治+腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期胃癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 180-183.
[8] 张伟, 尚丹丹, 尚培中, 李晓武, 苗建军, 刘冰. 腹腔镜术中应用壶腹钟表定位法和胆囊废弃术治疗80岁以上急性胆囊炎[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 188-191.
[9] 汪鑫, 向涵, 张伟. T型线联合超微创钳辅助经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 133-133.
[10] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[11] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[12] 刘志新, 陈小林, 肖文军, 刘思琪. 日间手术在儿童鞘膜积液腹腔镜手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 36-40.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要