切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 142 -145. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.02.008.

论著

腹腔镜直肠癌Dixon手术选择性应用超声刀和电钩的效果评价
金芳1, 徐东飞2, 尚培中1,(), 张伟1, 葛艳丽1, 李晓英1, 苗建军1, 郭伟林1   
  1. 1.075000 河北张家口,陆军第八十一集团军医院普通外科
    2.075400 河北张家口,怀来世济医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-08 出版日期:2025-04-26
  • 通信作者: 尚培中
  • 基金资助:
    张家口市卫生健康和生物医疗专项重点研发计划项目(2221121D)

Evaluation of the effect of selective application of ultrasonic knife and electric hook in laparoscopic Dixon surgery for rectal cancer

Fang Jin1, Dongfei Xu2, Peizhong Shang1,(), Wei Zhang1, Yanli Ge1, Xiaoying Li1, Jianjun Miao1, Weilin Guo1   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, the 81st Group Army Hospital of PLA, Zhangjiakou Hebei Province 075000,China
    2.Department of Anesthesiology, Shiji Hospital of Huailai, Zhangjiakou Hebei Province 075400, China
  • Received:2024-01-08 Published:2025-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Peizhong Shang
引用本文:

金芳, 徐东飞, 尚培中, 张伟, 葛艳丽, 李晓英, 苗建军, 郭伟林. 腹腔镜直肠癌Dixon手术选择性应用超声刀和电钩的效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 142-145.

Fang Jin, Dongfei Xu, Peizhong Shang, Wei Zhang, Yanli Ge, Xiaoying Li, Jianjun Miao, Weilin Guo. Evaluation of the effect of selective application of ultrasonic knife and electric hook in laparoscopic Dixon surgery for rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(02): 142-145.

目的

探讨腹腔镜直肠癌Dixon手术选择性应用超声刀和电钩的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2017年9月至2023年8月接受腹腔镜Dixon手术的直肠癌患者125例,根据手术解剖方式将患者分为两组,观察组65例术中选择性应用超声刀和电钩,对照组60例术中全程应用超声刀,比较两组患者手术相关指标及术后并发症。应用SPSS 22.0处理数据,计量资料采用(± s)表示,行独立样本t检验;计数资料采用[例(%)]表示,行χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

观察组与对照组比较,手术时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),患者术中失血量、术后3d腹腔引流总量、引流管拔除时间、尿管拔除时间、肠功能恢复时间及术后平均住院日差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后均未发生吻合口出血、吻合口漏及尿潴留。患者术后1年内吻合口狭窄发生率观察组为3.1%,对照组为3.3%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜直肠癌Dixon手术根据解剖部位及组织结构特点选择性应用超声刀和电钩,有利于加速手术进程,减少麻醉时间,降低并发症风险。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of selective application of ultrasonic knife and electric hook in laparoscopic Dixon surgery for rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 125 patients with rectal cancer who received laparoscopic Dixon surgery from September 2017 to August 2023.The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical anatomy method: 65 patients in the observation group were selectively treated with ultrasonic knife and electric hook during the operation,and 60 patients in the control group were treated with ultrasonic knife throughout the operation.Operationrelated indicators and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.SPSS 22.0 was used to process the data.Measurement data were expressed as (x±s) and independent sample t test was performed.The counting data is represented by[ cases (%)] and tested by line χ2.P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Compared with the control group, there were statistically significant differences in operation time (P<0.05), but no statistically significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative 3d abdominal drainage, drainage tube removal time, urinary tube removal time, intestinal function recovery time and postoperative average hospital stay (P>0.05).No postoperative anastomotic hemorrhage, anastomotic leakage and urinary retention occurred in both groups.The incidence of anastomotic stenosis within 1 year after surgery was 3.1% in the observation group and 3.3% in the control group, with no statistical significance (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic Dixon surgery for rectal cancer selectively uses ultrasonic knife and electric hook according to the anatomical location and tissue structure characteristics, which is conducive to accelerating the surgical process, reducing the anesthesia time, and reducing the risk of complications.

表1 两组腹腔镜直肠癌Dixon手术患者临床基线资料比较
表2 两组腹腔镜直肠癌Dixon手术患者围手术相关指标比较(± s
[1]
赵长林, 孙哲, 江洋深.谈如何应对影响中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治的因素与障碍[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 321-325.
[2]
付振龙, 曹万龙, 刘富红.腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.
[3]
Lim S, Nagai Y, Nozawa H, et al.Surgical outcomes of robotic,laparoscopic, and open low anterior resection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced lower rectal cancer[J].Surg Today, 2023, 53(1): 109-115.
[4]
郑民华, 马君俊.2018版《腹腔镜结直肠癌根治手术操作指南》更新要点[J].中华外科杂志, 2019, 57(03): 224-226.
[5]
宗海涛, 张素云, 张研.达芬奇机器人与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的近中期随访比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 684-687.
[6]
武慧铭, 郭仁凯, 李辉宇.机器人辅助下经自然腔道取标本手术治疗结直肠癌安全性和有效性的Meta分析[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 395-400.
[7]
Kasai S, Yamauchi S, Tazawa M, et al.Advantages of preoperative counseling with video for robotic rectal cancer surgery compared with conventional counseling: A randomized controlled tria[lJ].Asian J Endosc Surg, 2023, 16(2): 248-254.
[8]
舒同, 文红梅, 周皓岚, 等.中低位直肠癌侧方淋巴结阳性的危险因素分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022, 16(03): 339-342.
[9]
潘雨婷, 汝国栋, 于洪霞, 等.直肠癌患者新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜与开腹侧方淋巴结清扫术的近中期预后疗效分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 59-64.
[10]
李文熙, 郑鑫, 孙宝信, 等.NOSES -Ⅰ式B法与腹腔镜经括约肌间切除术在低位直肠癌中的对比研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 65-68.
[11]
彭胜建, 方锡才, 崔巍.经直肠肛门外翻技术与前切除术治疗低位直肠癌的近中期随访比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 335-338.
[12]
韩俊毅.3D腹腔镜经括约肌间沟直肠前切除术[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 105.
[13]
兰平, 黄亮.3D腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中对解剖层次显露的意义[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04):336-339.
[14]
李庆, 高波, 侯花屏, 等.腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治术中保留与不保留Denonvilliers筋膜的对照研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 639-642.
[15]
李甫根, 罗文君, 钱川, 等.以盆腔自主神经和固有筋膜为解剖标志的保留盆腔自主神经TME术对比研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 676-679.
[16]
杨自杰, 屈莲平, 杨增强, 等.直肠癌低位前切除术吻合方式优化对肛门功能保护研究进展[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 65-68.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后预置造口与襻式回肠造口短期疗效评价:一项倾向性评分匹配队列研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 21-27.
[2] 王振宁, 邹敏, 王得晨, 杨康, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 高峰. 经肛全直肠系膜切除术在低位直肠癌中的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 55-61.
[3] 郝金锦, 王欢欢, 郑少祥, 陈文亮. 脂联素在结直肠癌中的作用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 61-65.
[4] 丁文珠, 汪谦. 直肠癌经肛全直肠系膜切除术的肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 66-72.
[5] 肖建, 肖天保, 陈江, 杨桃, 何峰, 保甜甜, 曹一波, 杨琴, 赵颖. 吲哚菁绿成像技术在保留左结肠动脉的直肠癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 134-137.
[6] 左从奎, 毕迎春, 姚琼. 不同IMV 结扎水平的直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术临床效果对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 138-141.
[7] 汪鑫, 向涵, 张伟. T型线联合超微创钳辅助经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 133-133.
[8] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[9] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[10] 刘志新, 陈小林, 肖文军, 刘思琪. 日间手术在儿童鞘膜积液腹腔镜手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 36-40.
[11] 冯帆, 马文亮, 董翔, 潘骏, 甘卫东, 郭宏骞. 前后结合入路机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术早期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 83-87.
[12] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[13] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[14] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[15] 戴勇. 腹腔镜扩大左半结肠切除术(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 82-82.
阅读次数
全文


摘要