切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 261 -266. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.03.008

论著

胃癌根治术后感染性并发症预测:基于真实世界数据的Nomogram模型开发与验证
丁关棣1, 黄云2, 曹震3, 刘刚3,()   
  1. 1. 510006 广州,华南理工大学医学院;100048 北京,解放军总医院第六医学中心
    2. 100048 北京,解放军总医院第六医学中心;100048 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心
    3. 510006 广州,华南理工大学医学院;100048 北京,解放军总医院第六医学中心;100048 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-16 出版日期:2024-06-26
  • 通信作者: 刘刚

Prediction of infectious complications after radical gastrectomy: Development and validation of a Nomogram model based on real-world data

Guandi Ding1, Yun Huang2, Zhen Cao3, Gang Liu3,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Guangdong Province 510006, China;Department of General Surgery, the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 100048, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 100048, China;Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 100048, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Guangdong Province 510006, China;Department of General Surgery, the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 100048, China;Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2024-01-16 Published:2024-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Gang Liu
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(82103507)
引用本文:

丁关棣, 黄云, 曹震, 刘刚. 胃癌根治术后感染性并发症预测:基于真实世界数据的Nomogram模型开发与验证[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 261-266.

Guandi Ding, Yun Huang, Zhen Cao, Gang Liu. Prediction of infectious complications after radical gastrectomy: Development and validation of a Nomogram model based on real-world data[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 261-266.

目的

探讨胃癌根治术后发生感染性并发症的危险因素,建立并验证Nomogram预测模型。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2023年4月行胃癌根治术的600例胃癌患者资料。按照7∶3的比例随机将600名患者分为训练集和内部验证集。针对训练集行LASSO回归筛选变量,通过多因素Logistic回归分析构建Nomogram模型并利用内部验证集进行内部验证,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型效果。所有统计分析均使用R软件(版本4.2.2)以及MSTATA软件进行。

结果

600例行胃癌根治术的患者中,109例发生了术后感染,总感染发生例数为132例,医院感染发病率为22.0%。训练集与内部验证集患者的年龄、NRS评分、吸烟史、高血压病、糖尿病等临床特征差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),N分期除外(P=0.18)。LASSO回归筛选出7个回归系数非零的潜在预测因子:年龄、冠心病、前白蛋白、手术时间、术中出血量、术式、T分期。多因素Logistic回归分析以上7个因素,最终得出年龄>60岁、患有冠心病、术前较低的前白蛋白、手术时间>180min、术式选择为近端胃或全胃切除术是胃癌根治术后感染的独立危险因素(P <0.05),最终基于以上因素建立Nomogram预测模型。训练集及内部验证集的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.753、0.736,校准曲线及DCA提示模型有良好的预测能力及临床实用性,并建立了基于在线网络的交互式动态Nomogram应用程序。

结论

本研究构建了简单且实用的胃癌根治术后感染性并发症预测工具,可以量化术后感染的个体风险,从而促进早期的预防和治疗的实施。

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of infectious complications after radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer, and establish a Nomogram prediction model.

Methods

Data of 600 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy from January 2010 to April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The 600 patients were randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set at a ratio of 7∶3. Based on LASSO regression screening variables of the training set, a Nomogram model was constructed by multivariate Logistic regression analysis and verified internally by internal verification set. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model effect. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.2) and MSTATA software.

Results

Among 600 patients undergoing radical gastrectomy, 109 cases developed postoperative infection, the total number of infections was 132 cases, and the incidence of nosocomial infection was 22.0%. There was no significant difference in clinical features such as age, NRS score, smoking history, hypertension and diabetes between the training set and the internal verification set (P >0.05), except for N stage (P =0.18). Seven potential predictors with non-zero regression coefficients were identified by LASSO regression: age, coronary heart disease, prealbumin, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, operation type, and T stage. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of the above 7 factors showed that age >60 years old, coronary heart disease, low prealbumin before surgery, operation time >180min, proximal gastric resection or total gastrectomy were independent risk factors for postoperative infection after radical gastrectomy (P <0.05). Finally, a Nomogram prediction model was established based on the above factors. The area under ROC curve (AUC) of the training set and the internal validation set were 0.753 and 0.736, respectively. The calibration curve and DCA indicated that the model had good predictive ability and clinical practicability. An interactive Nomogram application based on online network was established.

Conclusion

In this study, we constructed a simple and practical tool for predicting infectious complications after radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer, which can quantify the individual risk of postoperative infection and promote the implementation of early prevention and treatment.

表1 胃癌患者训练集与内部验证集人口统计学与临床特征比较[例(%)]
特征 训练集(n=420) 内部验证集(n=180) P
年龄(岁) 0.231
≤60 202 (48.1) 77 (42.8)
>60 218 (51.9) 103 (57.2)
NRS评分(分) 0.645
≤3 286 (68.1) 126 (70.0)
>3 134 (31.9) 54 (30.0)
吸烟史 0.205
295 (70.2) 117 (65.0)
125 (29.8) 63 (35.0)
高血压病 0.212
308 (73.3) 123 (68.3)
112 (26.7) 57 (31.7)
糖尿病 0.409
363 (86.4) 160 (88.9)
57 (13.6) 20 (11.1)
冠心病 0.551
381 (90.7) 166 (92.2)
39 (9.3) 14 (7.8)
慢性阻塞性肺疾病 0.497
414 (98.6) 176 (97.8)
6 (1.4) 4 (2.2)
高脂血症 0.587
386 (91.9) 163 (90.6)
34 (8.1) 17 (9.4)
HGB(g/L) 0.121
Median (IQR) 126 (106, 141) 131 (113, 142)
ALB(g/L) 0.724
Median (IQR) 38.5 (35.9, 41.1) 38.6 (36.2, 41.0)
PAB(mg/L) 0.596
Median (IQR) 223 (174, 270) 224 (181, 264)
CEA(ng/ml) 0.630
Median (IQR) 1.9 (1.1, 3.2) 1.9 (1.2, 3.3)
CA19-9(U/ml) 0.691
Median (IQR) 8 (4, 17) 8 (4, 20)
手术时间(min) 0.808
≤180 149 (35.5) 62 (34.4)
>180 271 (64.5) 118 (65.6)
术中失血量(ml) 0.700
Median (IQR) 200 (100, 300) 200 (100, 300)
术式 0.546
远端胃大部切除术 228 (54.3) 100 (55.6)
全胃切除术 172 (41.0) 68 (37.8)
近端胃大部切除术 20 (4.8) 12 (6.7)
病理分化程度 0.801
低分化 350 (83.3) 148 (82.2)
中分化 56 (13.3) 24 (13.3)
高分化 14 (3.3) 8 (4.4)
肿瘤大小(长径cm) 0.103
Median (IQR) 4.4 (2.7, 6.0) 4.0 (2.3, 6.0)
T分期 0.002
T1/T2 139 (33.1) 83 (46.1)
T3/T4 281 (66.9) 97 (53.9)
N分期 0.180
N0/N1 220 (52.4) 105 (58.3)
N2/N3 200 (47.6) 75 (41.7)
术后病理分期 0.072
Ⅰ/Ⅱ 209 (49.8) 104 (57.8)
211 (50.2) 76 (42.2)
表2 训练集420例胃癌患者LASSO回归系数表
图1 420例LASSO回归交叉验证误差图及变量选择路径图 注:A=训练集420例胃癌患者误差图 ; Binomial Deviance =二项式偏差;B=训练集420例胃癌患者选择路径图;Coefficients =系数。
图2 训练集420例胃癌患者LASSO回归后7个候选诊断指标的ROC曲线分析 图4 训练集及内部验证集在Nomogram模型中的ROC曲线 注:1-Specificity = 1-特异度;Sensitivity = 敏感度。
表3 训练集420例胃癌患者多因素Logistic回归分析
图3 训练集420例胃癌患者Nomogram预测模型
图5 训练集(A)与内部验证集(B)胃癌患者在Nomogram预测模型的校准曲线 注:Predicted Probability=预测概率;Observed Probability=观测概率;Ideal=理想曲线;Apparent=表观性能;Bias-corrected=校正偏差。
图6 训练集(A)与内部验证集(B)胃癌患者Nomogram预测模型的决策曲线分析 注:Net Benefit=净收益;High Risk Threshold=高风险阈值;None=假设没有患者发生术后感染;All=假设所有患者都发生术后感染;Cost:Benefit Ratio=成本:效益比。
[1]
Siegel RLMiller KDWagle NS,et al. Cancer statistics,2023[J]. CA Cancer J Clin202373(1): 17-48.
[2]
Shibasaki SSuda KNakauchi M,et al. Non-robotic minimally invasive gastrectomy as an independent risk factor for postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications: A single-center,retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis[J]. World J Gastroenterol202026(11): 1172-1184.
[3]
李子禹,吴舟桥,王一丁,等. 腹腔镜胃癌术后主要并发症防治策略[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版). 202115(02): 133-138.
[4]
Zhang YWang ZBasharat Z,et al. Nomogram of intra-abdominal infection after surgery in patients with gastric cancer: A retrospective study[J]. Front Oncol202212: 982807.
[5]
Xiao YWei GMa M,et al. Association among prognostic nutritional index,post-operative infection and prognosis of stage II/III gastric cancer patients following radical gastrectomy[J]. Eur J Clin Nutr202276(10): 1449-1456.
[6]
Xia XZhang ZZhu C,et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote metastasis in gastric cancer patients with postoperative abdominal infectious complications[J]. Nat Commun202213(1): 1017.
[7]
Heeg EMarang-van de Mheen PJVan Maaren MC,et al. Association between initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy beyond 30 days after surgery and overall survival among patients with triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Int J Cancer2020147(1): 152-159.
[8]
Huang XLuo ZLiang W,et al. Survival Nomogram for Young Breast Cancer Patients Based on the SEER Database and an External Validation Cohort[J]. Ann Surg Oncol202229(9): 5772-5781.
[9]
Lv JLiu YYJia YT,et al. A nomogram model for predicting prognosis of obstructive colorectal cancer[J]. World J Surg Oncol202119(1): 337.
[10]
Wen JPan TYuan YC,et al. Nomogram to predict postoperative infectious complications after surgery for colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study in China[J]. World J Surg Oncol202119(1): 204.
[11]
Liu HLi ZZhang Q,et al. Multi‑institutional development and validation of a nomogram to predict prognosis of early-onset gastric cancer patients[J]. Front Immunol202213: 1007176.
[12]
陶亮,邵丽华,宋鹏,等. 预测腹腔镜中低位直肠癌术后并发症危险因素的列线图模型的建立[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(02): 182-186.
[13]
Fujiya KKumamaru HFujiwara Y,et al. Preoperative risk factors for postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complication after gastrectomy for gastric cancer using a Japanese web-based nationwide database[J]. Gastric Cancer202124(1): 205-213.
[14]
Qiao YQZheng LJia B,et al. Risk factors for surgical-site infections after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a study in China[J]. Chin Med J(Engl)2020133(13): 1540-1545.
[15]
李丽芳,邵静涛. 腹腔镜下胃癌根治术患者发生医院感染的病原菌分布及危险因素分析[J]. 浙江创伤外科202328(06): 1024-1026+1030.
[16]
沈荐,李敏哲,杜燕夫. 影响腹腔镜胃癌根治术后肺部感染的多因素分析[J]. 中国微创外科杂志202121(08): 700-704.
[17]
Liu XXue ZYu J,et al. Risk Factors for Postoperative Infectious Complications in Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer[J]. Cancer Manag Res202012: 4391-4398.
[18]
Lee PChandel NSSimon MC. Cellular adaptation to hypoxia through hypoxia inducible factors and beyond[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol202021(5): 268-283.
[19]
王炎,王东方,靳红领. 术前预后营养指数、前白蛋白与食管癌患者术后并发症及预后的关系[J]. 现代临床医学202349(06): 410-413.
[20]
Song SQiu PWang H,et al. Low preoperative serum prealbumin levels and risk of postoperative complications after transsphenoidal surgery in nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma[J]. Neurosurg Focus202253(6): E6.
[21]
罗进,燕速,邢多,等. 胃癌根治术术后手术部位感染的危险因素分析及预测模型的建立[J]. 中国消毒学杂志202239(01): 47-49.
[22]
中华医学会外科学分会胃肠外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会肿瘤外科医师委员会. 胃癌全胃切除术后食管空肠吻合口并发症防治中国专家共识(2020版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志202141(02): 121-124.
[1] 浦凌宵, 诸俊浩, 陶亮, 王峰, 王萌, 管文贤. 低黏附性胃癌PET/CT影像学特征和脂代谢相关机制研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 255-260.
[2] 李子禹, 张效鹏, 李双喜. 不断提高腹腔镜胃癌全胃切除术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 119-122.
[3] 黄昌明, 郑华龙, 郑红红. 腹腔镜胃癌全胃切除术消化道重建术式选择与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 123-126.
[4] 李乐平, 肖琨, 张荣华, 商亮, 靖昌庆. 腹腔镜全胃切除术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 127-130.
[5] 蔡敏, 魏少忠, 罗怡静. 不同抗反流消化道重建技术在近端胃切除术后胃癌患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 137-140.
[6] 王刚, 李涛, 刘玉芳. 胃癌根治手术后行抗菌药物治疗对患者肠道细菌移位及肠黏膜屏障功能的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 141-145.
[7] 刘政宏, 王凤力, 吉亚君, 高佳. 胃癌中ELK3蛋白的表达与临床病理特征和预后的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 155-159.
[8] 孙燕, 宋鹏, 刘佩玉, 沈晓菲, 管文贤, 李雪云. 多功能淋巴结分拣操作台在胃癌根治术后淋巴结分拣中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 160-163.
[9] 茆阳, 张海涛, 潘寅初. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中附加H-M幽门成形术与改良幽门肌切开术的近期疗效和生活质量对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 167-170.
[10] 张琳, 李婷. CRIP1在胃癌中的表达及与临床病理指标和预后的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 171-175.
[11] 陈静, 王晓玲, 安康. 老年进展期胃癌术后腹膜转移的相关因素及治疗进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 225-228.
[12] 郑朝辉, 唐逸辉, 许斌斌, 钟情. 吲哚菁绿示踪全腹腔镜全胃切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 131-131.
[13] 刘化胜, 郑龙波, 秦琛, 王伟芹, 郑学风, 马金龙, 马正, 王洪霞, 刘磊, 胡继霖. 基于影像学指标构建永久性乙状结肠造口旁疝发病风险预测模型[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 75-82.
[14] 师帅, 马文星, 陈昕, 单良, 王泽正, 段降龙, 吴云桦. 腹壁切口疝围手术期并发症发生危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 83-88.
[15] 谭明达, 颜军, 郭诗翔. 保留十二指肠、胆总管、Oddi括约肌的胰头整块全切除术后并发症分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 145-150.
阅读次数
全文


摘要