切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 684 -687. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2023.06.026

论著

腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究
付振保(), 曹万龙, 刘富红   
  1. 643000 四川自贡,自贡市第一人民医院普通外科
    643000 四川自贡,自贡市第一人民医院呼吸与危重医学科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-08 出版日期:2023-12-26
  • 通信作者: 付振保

Clinical effect of double ileal stomy with different suture methods during laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer

Zhenbao Fu(), Wanlong Cao, Fuhong Liu   

  1. Department of General Surgery, First People's Hospital of Zigong City, Zigong SiChuan Province 643000, China
    Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First People's Hospital of Zigong City, Zigong SiChuan Province 643000, China
  • Received:2023-07-08 Published:2023-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhenbao Fu
  • Supported by:
    Health Research Project of Zigong City in 2021(21yb009)
引用本文:

付振保, 曹万龙, 刘富红. 腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.

Zhenbao Fu, Wanlong Cao, Fuhong Liu. Clinical effect of double ileal stomy with different suture methods during laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.

目的

分析腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中皮内连续缝合和改良一针法在回肠双腔造口术中的临床应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年12月80例低位直肠癌患者资料,所有患者均行腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术+预防性回肠双腔造口术。根据造口缝合方式不同分为两组,观察组39例采用皮内连续缝合方式完成回肠造口,对照组41例采用改良一针法完成回肠造口。应用软件SPSS 22.0处理研究数据。围手术期指标和直肠前切除综合征(LARS)评分等计量资料采用()表示,行独立样本t检验;并发症等计数资料采用[例(%)]表示,行χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

观察组患者手术时间、造口时间显著短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者造口相关并发症总发生率虽低于对照组(2.6% vs.14.6%),但差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者造口术后1个月、3个月LARS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但两组患者造口术后3个月LARS评分显著低于术后1个月(P<0.05)。

结论

皮内连续缝合和改良一针法回肠双腔造口术在腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术治疗低位直肠癌中均是安全有效的,其中皮内连续缝合在不增加术后造口并发症发生率的基础上,明显缩短了手术时间和造口时间,且术后无需拆线,更值得广泛推广应用。

Objective

To analyze the clinical effect of continuous intradermal suture and modified one-needle method in double ileal stomy during laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer.

Methods

Data of 80 patients with low rectal cancer from January 2021 to December 2022 were retrospectively selected. All patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer plus prophylactic double ileal stomy. They were divided into two groups according to different suture methods. 39 cases in the observation group were completed by intradermal continuous suture, and 41 cases in the control group were completed by improved one-needle method. SPSS 22.0 software was used to process the research data. Measurement data such as perioperative indexes and LARS score were represented by (), and independent sample t-test was performed. Complications and other statistical data were represented by [n (%)] and χ2 test was performed. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Operation time and stomy time in observation group were significantly shorter than those in control group (P<0.05). The total incidence of stomation-related complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (2.6% vs.14.6%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the LARS score 1month and 3 months after stomy between the two groups (P>0.05), but the LARS score 3 months after stomy was significantly lower than that 1 month after surgery (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Continuous intradermal suture and modified one-needle ileal double-cavity stomy are safe and effective in the treatment of low rectal cancer by laparoscopic low anterior resection. On the basis of not increasing the incidence of postoperative complications, continuous intradermal suture can significantly shorten the operation time and stomy time, and there is no need for postoperative suture removal, so it is worthy of widespread application.

表1 80例腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术+回肠双腔造口术不同缝合方法两组患者临床资料比较[(), 例]
表2 80例腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术+回肠双腔造口术不同缝合方法两组患者围手术期指标比较()
表3 80例腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术+回肠双腔造口术不同缝合方法两组患者造口相关并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
表4 80例腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术+回肠双腔造口术不同缝合方法两组患者造口术后LARS评分对比()
[1]
国家癌症中心中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南制定专家组. 中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2020,北京)[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2021, 30(01): 1-28.
[2]
Sankaran RJRaman DKRaju P,et al. Laparoscopic Ultra Low Anterior Resection: Single Center,6-Year Study[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(3): 284-291.
[3]
Franchini Melani AGCapochin Romagnolo LG. Management of postoperative complications during laparoscopic anterior rectal resection[J]. Minerva Surg, 2021, 76(4): 324-331.
[4]
Maglio AMalvone APScaduto V,et al. The frequency of early stomal,peristomal and skin complications[J]. Br J Nurs, 2021, 30(22): 1272-1276.
[5]
Lord IReeves LGray A,et al. Loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective comparison of three techniques[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2020, 90(9): 1632-1636.
[6]
Kostov GDimov RDoykov M. Diverting ileostomy in low anterior resection: single center retrospective analysis[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2022, 94(6): 26-32.
[7]
Peltrini RGreco PABucci L. Use of LARS score beyond radical rectal surgery[J]. Updates Surg, 2020, 72(3): 921-922.
[8]
寻鲁宁,王冲,沈成凤,等. 1990-2019年中国结直肠癌发病趋势分析及预测模型比较[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2023, 32(04): 279-286.
[9]
Mu YZhao LHe H,et al. The efficacy of ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2021, 19(1): 318.
[10]
蓝青楠,俞金龙,余捷,等. 两针法连续缝合在回肠单腔造口术中的应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2022, 25(11): 1020-1024.
[11]
杜昆利,任佳慧,张雅静,等. 全层间断缝合法对回肠造口还纳术后切口愈合的影响[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2020, 49(12): 1654-1656.
[12]
赵玉洲,韩广森,马鹏飞,等. 一针法预防性回肠造口在直肠癌低位前切除手术中的应用[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 9(02): 157-161.
[13]
王杰,沈凯文,汤东,等. 改良三针法回肠末端预防性造口手术技巧的应用[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 39-41.
[14]
Schiffmann LKostev KKalder M. Fecal and urinary incontinence are major problems associated with rectal cancer[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2020, 35(1): 35-40.
[15]
Pilkington SABhome RGilbert S,et al. Sequential assessment of bowel function and anorectal physiology after anterior resection for cancer: a prospective cohort study[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2021, 23(9): 2436-2446.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?