切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 684 -687. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2023.06.026

论著

腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究
付振保(), 曹万龙, 刘富红   
  1. 643000 四川自贡,自贡市第一人民医院普通外科
    643000 四川自贡,自贡市第一人民医院呼吸与危重医学科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-08 出版日期:2023-12-26
  • 通信作者: 付振保

Clinical effect of double ileal stomy with different suture methods during laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer

Zhenbao Fu(), Wanlong Cao, Fuhong Liu   

  1. Department of General Surgery, First People's Hospital of Zigong City, Zigong SiChuan Province 643000, China
    Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First People's Hospital of Zigong City, Zigong SiChuan Province 643000, China
  • Received:2023-07-08 Published:2023-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhenbao Fu
  • Supported by:
    Health Research Project of Zigong City in 2021(21yb009)
引用本文:

付振保, 曹万龙, 刘富红. 腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.

Zhenbao Fu, Wanlong Cao, Fuhong Liu. Clinical effect of double ileal stomy with different suture methods during laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.

目的

分析腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中皮内连续缝合和改良一针法在回肠双腔造口术中的临床应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年12月80例低位直肠癌患者资料,所有患者均行腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术+预防性回肠双腔造口术。根据造口缝合方式不同分为两组,观察组39例采用皮内连续缝合方式完成回肠造口,对照组41例采用改良一针法完成回肠造口。应用软件SPSS 22.0处理研究数据。围手术期指标和直肠前切除综合征(LARS)评分等计量资料采用()表示,行独立样本t检验;并发症等计数资料采用[例(%)]表示,行χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

观察组患者手术时间、造口时间显著短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者造口相关并发症总发生率虽低于对照组(2.6% vs.14.6%),但差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者造口术后1个月、3个月LARS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但两组患者造口术后3个月LARS评分显著低于术后1个月(P<0.05)。

结论

皮内连续缝合和改良一针法回肠双腔造口术在腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术治疗低位直肠癌中均是安全有效的,其中皮内连续缝合在不增加术后造口并发症发生率的基础上,明显缩短了手术时间和造口时间,且术后无需拆线,更值得广泛推广应用。

Objective

To analyze the clinical effect of continuous intradermal suture and modified one-needle method in double ileal stomy during laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer.

Methods

Data of 80 patients with low rectal cancer from January 2021 to December 2022 were retrospectively selected. All patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer plus prophylactic double ileal stomy. They were divided into two groups according to different suture methods. 39 cases in the observation group were completed by intradermal continuous suture, and 41 cases in the control group were completed by improved one-needle method. SPSS 22.0 software was used to process the research data. Measurement data such as perioperative indexes and LARS score were represented by (), and independent sample t-test was performed. Complications and other statistical data were represented by [n (%)] and χ2 test was performed. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Operation time and stomy time in observation group were significantly shorter than those in control group (P<0.05). The total incidence of stomation-related complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (2.6% vs.14.6%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the LARS score 1month and 3 months after stomy between the two groups (P>0.05), but the LARS score 3 months after stomy was significantly lower than that 1 month after surgery (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Continuous intradermal suture and modified one-needle ileal double-cavity stomy are safe and effective in the treatment of low rectal cancer by laparoscopic low anterior resection. On the basis of not increasing the incidence of postoperative complications, continuous intradermal suture can significantly shorten the operation time and stomy time, and there is no need for postoperative suture removal, so it is worthy of widespread application.

表1 80例腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术+回肠双腔造口术不同缝合方法两组患者临床资料比较[(), 例]
表2 80例腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术+回肠双腔造口术不同缝合方法两组患者围手术期指标比较()
表3 80例腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术+回肠双腔造口术不同缝合方法两组患者造口相关并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
表4 80例腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术+回肠双腔造口术不同缝合方法两组患者造口术后LARS评分对比()
[1]
国家癌症中心中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南制定专家组. 中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2020,北京)[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2021, 30(01): 1-28.
[2]
Sankaran RJRaman DKRaju P,et al. Laparoscopic Ultra Low Anterior Resection: Single Center,6-Year Study[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(3): 284-291.
[3]
Franchini Melani AGCapochin Romagnolo LG. Management of postoperative complications during laparoscopic anterior rectal resection[J]. Minerva Surg, 2021, 76(4): 324-331.
[4]
Maglio AMalvone APScaduto V,et al. The frequency of early stomal,peristomal and skin complications[J]. Br J Nurs, 2021, 30(22): 1272-1276.
[5]
Lord IReeves LGray A,et al. Loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective comparison of three techniques[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2020, 90(9): 1632-1636.
[6]
Kostov GDimov RDoykov M. Diverting ileostomy in low anterior resection: single center retrospective analysis[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2022, 94(6): 26-32.
[7]
Peltrini RGreco PABucci L. Use of LARS score beyond radical rectal surgery[J]. Updates Surg, 2020, 72(3): 921-922.
[8]
寻鲁宁,王冲,沈成凤,等. 1990-2019年中国结直肠癌发病趋势分析及预测模型比较[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2023, 32(04): 279-286.
[9]
Mu YZhao LHe H,et al. The efficacy of ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2021, 19(1): 318.
[10]
蓝青楠,俞金龙,余捷,等. 两针法连续缝合在回肠单腔造口术中的应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2022, 25(11): 1020-1024.
[11]
杜昆利,任佳慧,张雅静,等. 全层间断缝合法对回肠造口还纳术后切口愈合的影响[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2020, 49(12): 1654-1656.
[12]
赵玉洲,韩广森,马鹏飞,等. 一针法预防性回肠造口在直肠癌低位前切除手术中的应用[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 9(02): 157-161.
[13]
王杰,沈凯文,汤东,等. 改良三针法回肠末端预防性造口手术技巧的应用[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 39-41.
[14]
Schiffmann LKostev KKalder M. Fecal and urinary incontinence are major problems associated with rectal cancer[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2020, 35(1): 35-40.
[15]
Pilkington SABhome RGilbert S,et al. Sequential assessment of bowel function and anorectal physiology after anterior resection for cancer: a prospective cohort study[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2021, 23(9): 2436-2446.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[4] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[11] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[12] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[13] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
[14] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[15] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要