切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 518 -521. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2023.05.013

论著

不同手术时机对原发性肝癌自发破裂出血患者远期预后的影响
陈忠垚, 陈胜灯, 李秋()   
  1. 646000 四川泸州,西南医科大学附属医院普通外科(肝胆)
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-09 出版日期:2023-10-26
  • 通信作者: 李秋

The effect of different surgical timing on the long-term prognosis of patients with spontaneous rupture and bleeding of primary liver cancer

Zhongyao Chen, Shengdeng Chen, Qiu Li()   

  1. Department of General Surgery (Hepatobiliary), Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou Sichuan Province 646000, China
  • Received:2023-05-09 Published:2023-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Qiu Li
  • Supported by:
    2022 Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Joint Innovation Project(2022VES0626-C2)
引用本文:

陈忠垚, 陈胜灯, 李秋. 不同手术时机对原发性肝癌自发破裂出血患者远期预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 518-521.

Zhongyao Chen, Shengdeng Chen, Qiu Li. The effect of different surgical timing on the long-term prognosis of patients with spontaneous rupture and bleeding of primary liver cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 518-521.

目的

探索不同手术时机的选择对原发性肝癌自发破裂出血患者远期预后的影响。

方法

随机选取2015年3月至2020年3月住院治疗的110例原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血患者为研究对象。根据患者出现自发破裂出血至手术开始的时间不同,分为观察组(n=52例,手术实施时间≤2周)和对照组(n=58例,手术实施时间>2周)。数据统计采用SPSS 20.0统计学软件,围手术期各项指标以(

x¯
±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症采用χ2检验;3年随访结果采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。以P<0.05为有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者均不存在围手术期死亡病例,且在术中出血量、总住院时间、大网膜种植转移发生率和术后出现并发症的总发生率方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);随访期间,两组患者出现肝内复发或肝外转移的病例数差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.036、0.459,P>0.05);至3年随访结束,观察组和对照组患者总生存率(34.6% vs. 6.8%)及无瘤生存时间(20个月 vs. 6个月),均明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

2周内对原发性肝癌自发破裂出血患者进行手术治疗,可有助于延长无瘤生存时间,提高总生存率,远期预后较好,值得引起临床关注。

Objective

To explore the effect of different surgical timing on the long-term prognosis of patients with spontaneous rupture and hemorrhage of primary liver cancer.

Method

A total of 110 patients with spontaneous rupture hemorrhage of primary liver cancer who were hospitalized from March 2015 to March 2020 were randomly selected as the study objects. Patients were divided into observation group(n=52 cases,operation time ≤2 weeks)and control group(n=58 cases,operation time > 2 weeks)according to the different time between spontaneous rupture bleeding and operation. SPSS 20.0 was used for statistical analysis. Perioperative indicators were expressed as(

x¯
±s)and independent sample t test was used. χ2 test was used for postoperative complications. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used for 3-year follow-up. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were no perioperative death cases between the two groups,and there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss,total hospital stay,incidence of greater omental implantation transfer and incidence of postoperative complications(P>0.05). During the follow-up period,there was no significant difference in the number of patients with intrahepatic recurrence or extrahepatic metastasis between the two groups(χ2=0.036,0.459,P>0.05). By the end of the 3-year follow-up,the overall survival rate(34.6% vs. 6.8%)and the tumor-free survival time(20 months vs. 6 months)in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).

Conclusion

Surgical treatment of patients with spontaneous rupture and hemorrhage of primary liver cancer within 2 weeks can help to prolong the tumor-free survival time,improve the overall survival rate,and have a good long-term prognosis,which is worthy of clinical attention.

表1 110例PLC自发破裂出血不同手术时机两组患者一般临床资料比较[(
x¯
±s),例]
表2 110例PLC自发破裂出血不同手术时机两组患者围手术期指标比较[(
x¯
±s),例]
表3 110例PLC自发破裂出血患者不同手术时间两组患者术后并发症比较(例)
表4 110例PLC自发破裂出血不同手术时机两组患者肝内复发或肝外转移比较(例)
图2 110例PLC自发破裂出血患者不同手术时机两组患者无瘤生存时间比较
[1]
He QYang XWang Q,et al. Effect of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation and Surgical Resection on Treating of Primary Small Liver Cancer:A Meta-Analysis[J]. Proceedings of Anticancer Research20215(1):176-179.
[2]
Jiang QWang YXi R,et al. Development and Validation of a Health Needs Assessment Scale for Primary Liver Cancer Patients Receiving Surgical Management[J]. Science Publishing Group20213(2):53-57.
[3]
方驰华,张鹏,周伟平,等. 三维可视化技术用于1 665例原发性肝癌精准诊治的多中心回顾性研究[J]. 中华外科杂志202058(05):8-9.
[4]
Zhong HHu RJiang YS. Evaluation of short-and medium-term efficacy and complications of ultrasound-guided ablation for small liver cancer[J]. World J Clin Cases202210(14):4414-4424.
[5]
林坤,高知玲,杨冠华,等. 基于多层螺旋CT影像特征原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血危险因素分析[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志202127(09):5-7.
[6]
Zeng ZMMo NZeng J,et al. Advances in postoperative adjuvant therapy for primary liver cancer[J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol202214(9):1604-1621.
[7]
李依川,彭彬,辛大平,等. 三种肝血流阻断术的左半肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的对比研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),202115(05):566-569.
[8]
Kabir TTan ZZXChua DW,et al. Early experience with laparoscopic liver resection for spontaneously ruptured hepatocellularcarcinoma[J]. J Minim Access Surg202016(3):239-245.
[9]
康鹏东,张锴,张尧,等. 术中超声辅助下控制性低中心静脉压在大肝癌腔镜切除术中的价值[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),202216(06):627-630.
[10]
黄小准,王春玲,黄璋侃,等. 急诊切除或肝动脉栓塞术后二期切除治疗肝癌自发破裂出血近远期疗效的荟萃分析. 中华肝胆外科杂志202127(11):852-857.
[11]
方程,郑英俊,苏松,等. 原发性肝癌破裂出血急诊肝切除与延期肝切除对比的Meta分析[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(引文版)医药卫生20227(05):68-71.
[12]
伊比然恨,邵鹏飞,王文海,等. 高原地区原发性肝癌患者癌块自发破裂出血的影响因素分析[J]. 中国医刊202257(11):1193-1196.
[13]
周春,刘圣,祖庆泉,等. 选择性动脉栓塞治疗原发性肝癌自发破裂出血的疗效及预后分析[J]. 介入放射学杂志201726(12):1093-1097.
[14]
张园园,邓敏,王浩文,等. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血继发感染的救治与护理[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志202114(03):213-215.
[15]
向清玉,郑玉玲. 肝癌自发破裂出血超声表现1例[J]. 临床超声医学杂志201719(03):154,158.
[16]
万文武,张瑜,丁兵,等. 肝切除术与TACE治疗原发性肝癌破裂出血疗效的倾向评分匹配分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志202231(01):67-69.
[17]
龚程,田银生,刘爽. 不同时间窗手术治疗原发性肝癌自发破裂出血患者2年生存率比较[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志202326(02):147-148.
[18]
Suoh MHagihara AKageyama K,et al. Successful transcatheter arterial embolization for hemothorax from a spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis to the chest wall in an elderly patient[J]. Intern Med202160(14):2223-2228.
[19]
何泳铸,何坤,王泽亮,等. 腹腔热灌注化疗在肝癌破裂出血术后肿瘤复发中的应用价值[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志202026(06):431-434.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[3] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[4] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[5] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[6] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[7] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[8] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[9] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[10] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[11] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[12] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 吴广迎, 张延娟, 秦鹏, 卢艳丽. 经颈静脉肝内门体静脉分流术预防上消化道出血的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 545-548.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?