切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 385 -388. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2023.04.010

论著

基于模型的西妥昔单抗治疗胃癌细胞系的反应和耐药因素分析
刘付有欢(), 吴秀芹, 邓翠婷, 苏青   
  1. 510000 广州,南方医科大学珠江医院院药剂科
    511000 广州,南方医科大学南方医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-15 出版日期:2023-08-26
  • 通信作者: 刘付有欢

Model based analysis of response and resistance factors to cetuximab treatment in gastric cancer cell lines

Fu Youhuan Liu(), Xiuqin Wu, Cuiting Deng, Qing Su   

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou Guangdong Province 510000, China
    Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou Guangdong Province 511000, China
  • Received:2022-10-15 Published:2023-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Fu Youhuan Liu
  • Supported by:
    Guangdong Medical Research Foundation in 2022(C2022071)
引用本文:

刘付有欢, 吴秀芹, 邓翠婷, 苏青. 基于模型的西妥昔单抗治疗胃癌细胞系的反应和耐药因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 385-388.

Fu Youhuan Liu, Xiuqin Wu, Cuiting Deng, Qing Su. Model based analysis of response and resistance factors to cetuximab treatment in gastric cancer cell lines[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 385-388.

目的

研究建立胃癌靶向治疗机制的模型,探讨西妥昔单抗治疗的反应和耐药因素。

方法

建立西妥昔单抗治疗胃癌细胞系模型。捕获两种不同突变模式的胃癌细胞系中的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、细胞外调节蛋白激酶(ERK)和蛋白激酶B(AKT)信号通路。采用MatLab工具箱及ImageJ软件进行统计学数据及图像处理,使用时间和剂量反应测量的综合选择来训练模型,并提供参数和预测不确定性的评估。

结果

胃癌细胞系模型有助于识别细胞系之间的因果差异。提供了对不同扰动的响应预测,例如打击和淘汰实验。在其他结果中,该模型预测了酪氨酸激酶受体(MET)突变对西妥昔单抗敏感性的影响。

结论

这些预测能力使该模型成为评估胃癌细胞系信号以及可能开发和发现预测生物标记物的基础。

Objective

The aim of this study was to establish a mechanism model of targeted therapy for gastric cancer in order to study the response and resistance factors of cetuximab therapy.

Methods

In this study,cetuximab treatment of gastric cancer cell line model was established. The model captures the epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR),extracellular regulatory protein kinase(ERK),and protein kinase B(AKT)signaling pathways in two gastric cancer cell lines with different mutation patterns. The MatLab toolbox and ImageJ software were used for statistical data and image processing,and a comprehensive selection of time and dose response measurements was used to train the model and provide an assessment of parameters and prediction uncertainties.

Results

The model presented in this paper helps to identify causal differences between cell lines. The study shows that the model provides predictions of responses to different perturbations,such as strike and elimination experiments. Among other results,the model predicted the effect of tyrosine kinase receptor(MET)mutations on cetuximab sensitivity.

Conclusions

These predictive capabilities make the model a basis for evaluating gastric cancer cell line signaling and possibly developing and discovering predictive biomarkers.

图1 实验数据和模型适用于胃癌细胞系MKN1注:A=用于多起点局部优化的瀑布图。1 000次试验中最好的500次被描绘出来,蓝色方框显示了最佳50次的放大倍数。红点表示在很小的数值范围内收敛到全局最优值的开始;B=散点图总体上符合实验数据和模型拟合度;C-D=选定的实验数据和模型拟合的比较。利用免疫印迹技术获得的时间和剂量反应数据显示了3个生物实验的平均值和标准差。对于C和D中的可视化,使用估计的比例因子将实验测量缩放到模型模拟,以覆盖对不同实验条件的响应。
图2 适用于胃癌细胞系Hs746T的实验数据和模型注:A=多起点局部优化的瀑布图。图中显示了2 000次试验中最好的500次,蓝色方框显示了最佳50场试验的放大倍数。红点表示在很小的数值范围内收敛到全局最优值的开始;B=散点图为实验数据与模型拟合的总体一致性;C-D=选定实验数据的比较和模型拟合。利用免疫印迹技术获得的时间和剂量反应数据显示了3个生物实验的平均值和标准差。
[1]
Li CZheng JXue Y. Effects of vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor on biological properties of gastric cancer cells[J]. Arch Med Sci201915(6):1498-1509.
[2]
Chen QShen LChen C,et al. Cetuximab combined with cisplatin improves the prognosis of gastric cancer patients and its effect on P38 MAPK expression[J]. J Buon201924(6):2490-2498.
[3]
Oh DYLee KWHan SW,et al. A First-in-Human Phase I Study of GC1118,a Novel Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody,in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors[J]. Oncologist201924(8):1037-e636.
[4]
Obermannova RValik DHasenclever D,et al. High prevalence of severe hypovitaminosis D in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy with or without anti-EGFR-directed monoclonal antibody(EXPAND trial)showing no prognostic impact[J]. Eur J Cancer2019116:107-113.
[5]
Ebert KZwingenberger GBarbaria E,et al. Correction to:Determining the effects of trastuzumab,cetuximab and afatinib by phosphoprotein,gene expression and phenotypic analysis in gastric cancer cell lines[J]. Bmc Cancer202020(1):1127.
[6]
Raimundez EKeller SZwingenberger G,et al. Model-based analysis of response and resistance factors of cetuximab treatment in gastric cancer cell lines[J]. Plos Comput Biol202016(3):e1007147.
[7]
Zhang JPang XLei L,et al. LncRNA CRART16/miR-122-5p/FOS axis promotes angiogenesis of gastric cancer by upregulating VEGFD expression[J]. Aging(Albany NY)202214(9):4137-4157.
[8]
Maron SBXu JJanjigian YY. Targeting EGFR in Esophagogastric Cancer[J]. Front Oncol202010:553876.
[9]
Lv JGuo TQu X,et al. PD-L1 Under Regulation of miR-429 Influences the Sensitivity of Gastric Cancer Cells to TRAIL by Binding of EGFR[J]. Front Oncol202010:1067.
[10]
Nakamura YSasaki AYukami H,et al. Emergence of Concurrent Multiple EGFR Mutations and MET Amplification in a Patient With EGFR-Amplified Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated With Cetuximab[J]. JCO Precis Oncol20204:PO.20.00263.
[11]
Ebert KZwingenberger GBarbaria E,et al. Determining the effects of trastuzumab,cetuximab and afatinib by phosphoprotein,gene expression and phenotypic analysis in gastric cancer cell lines[J]. Bmc Cancer202020(1):1039.
[12]
Yamaguchi KFuse NKomatsu Y,et al. Phase II study of cetuximab plus S-1/cisplatin therapy in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol202151(6):879-885.
[13]
Ma HWu JZhou M,et al. Inhibition of Glutamine Uptake Improves the Efficacy of Cetuximab on Gastric Cancer[J]. Integr Cancer Ther202120:15357354211045349.
[14]
Xin LTang FSong B,et al. Objective Quantitation of EGFR Protein Levels using Quantitative Dot Blot Method for the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients[J]. J Gastric Cancer202121(4):335-351.
[15]
Tachibana TYoshii YMatsumoto H,et al. Efficacy of vorinostat-sensitized intraperitoneal radioimmunotherapy with(64)Cu-labeled cetuximab against peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer in a mouse model[J]. J Cancer Res Ther202218(4):907-914.
[1] 安杰, 牛云峰, 刘伟. LINC00520 通过miR-519b-3p/HIF1A 轴促进胃癌的侵袭转移[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 430-436.
[2] 许革新, 何琦, 毛智军, 普彦淞, 杨淦傑, 王建华. 我国胃肿瘤外科治疗现状及发展趋势—基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 350-356.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[10] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[11] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[12] 刘海旺, 施海, 尚利峰. 不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 643-646.
[13] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[14] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[15] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?