切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 385 -388. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2023.04.010

论著

基于模型的西妥昔单抗治疗胃癌细胞系的反应和耐药因素分析
刘付有欢(), 吴秀芹, 邓翠婷, 苏青   
  1. 510000 广州,南方医科大学珠江医院院药剂科
    511000 广州,南方医科大学南方医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-15 出版日期:2023-08-26
  • 通信作者: 刘付有欢

Model based analysis of response and resistance factors to cetuximab treatment in gastric cancer cell lines

Fu Youhuan Liu(), Xiuqin Wu, Cuiting Deng, Qing Su   

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou Guangdong Province 510000, China
    Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou Guangdong Province 511000, China
  • Received:2022-10-15 Published:2023-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Fu Youhuan Liu
  • Supported by:
    Guangdong Medical Research Foundation in 2022(C2022071)
引用本文:

刘付有欢, 吴秀芹, 邓翠婷, 苏青. 基于模型的西妥昔单抗治疗胃癌细胞系的反应和耐药因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 385-388.

Fu Youhuan Liu, Xiuqin Wu, Cuiting Deng, Qing Su. Model based analysis of response and resistance factors to cetuximab treatment in gastric cancer cell lines[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 385-388.

目的

研究建立胃癌靶向治疗机制的模型,探讨西妥昔单抗治疗的反应和耐药因素。

方法

建立西妥昔单抗治疗胃癌细胞系模型。捕获两种不同突变模式的胃癌细胞系中的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、细胞外调节蛋白激酶(ERK)和蛋白激酶B(AKT)信号通路。采用MatLab工具箱及ImageJ软件进行统计学数据及图像处理,使用时间和剂量反应测量的综合选择来训练模型,并提供参数和预测不确定性的评估。

结果

胃癌细胞系模型有助于识别细胞系之间的因果差异。提供了对不同扰动的响应预测,例如打击和淘汰实验。在其他结果中,该模型预测了酪氨酸激酶受体(MET)突变对西妥昔单抗敏感性的影响。

结论

这些预测能力使该模型成为评估胃癌细胞系信号以及可能开发和发现预测生物标记物的基础。

Objective

The aim of this study was to establish a mechanism model of targeted therapy for gastric cancer in order to study the response and resistance factors of cetuximab therapy.

Methods

In this study,cetuximab treatment of gastric cancer cell line model was established. The model captures the epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR),extracellular regulatory protein kinase(ERK),and protein kinase B(AKT)signaling pathways in two gastric cancer cell lines with different mutation patterns. The MatLab toolbox and ImageJ software were used for statistical data and image processing,and a comprehensive selection of time and dose response measurements was used to train the model and provide an assessment of parameters and prediction uncertainties.

Results

The model presented in this paper helps to identify causal differences between cell lines. The study shows that the model provides predictions of responses to different perturbations,such as strike and elimination experiments. Among other results,the model predicted the effect of tyrosine kinase receptor(MET)mutations on cetuximab sensitivity.

Conclusions

These predictive capabilities make the model a basis for evaluating gastric cancer cell line signaling and possibly developing and discovering predictive biomarkers.

图1 实验数据和模型适用于胃癌细胞系MKN1注:A=用于多起点局部优化的瀑布图。1 000次试验中最好的500次被描绘出来,蓝色方框显示了最佳50次的放大倍数。红点表示在很小的数值范围内收敛到全局最优值的开始;B=散点图总体上符合实验数据和模型拟合度;C-D=选定的实验数据和模型拟合的比较。利用免疫印迹技术获得的时间和剂量反应数据显示了3个生物实验的平均值和标准差。对于C和D中的可视化,使用估计的比例因子将实验测量缩放到模型模拟,以覆盖对不同实验条件的响应。
图2 适用于胃癌细胞系Hs746T的实验数据和模型注:A=多起点局部优化的瀑布图。图中显示了2 000次试验中最好的500次,蓝色方框显示了最佳50场试验的放大倍数。红点表示在很小的数值范围内收敛到全局最优值的开始;B=散点图为实验数据与模型拟合的总体一致性;C-D=选定实验数据的比较和模型拟合。利用免疫印迹技术获得的时间和剂量反应数据显示了3个生物实验的平均值和标准差。
[1]
Li CZheng JXue Y. Effects of vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor on biological properties of gastric cancer cells[J]. Arch Med Sci201915(6):1498-1509.
[2]
Chen QShen LChen C,et al. Cetuximab combined with cisplatin improves the prognosis of gastric cancer patients and its effect on P38 MAPK expression[J]. J Buon201924(6):2490-2498.
[3]
Oh DYLee KWHan SW,et al. A First-in-Human Phase I Study of GC1118,a Novel Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody,in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors[J]. Oncologist201924(8):1037-e636.
[4]
Obermannova RValik DHasenclever D,et al. High prevalence of severe hypovitaminosis D in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy with or without anti-EGFR-directed monoclonal antibody(EXPAND trial)showing no prognostic impact[J]. Eur J Cancer2019116:107-113.
[5]
Ebert KZwingenberger GBarbaria E,et al. Correction to:Determining the effects of trastuzumab,cetuximab and afatinib by phosphoprotein,gene expression and phenotypic analysis in gastric cancer cell lines[J]. Bmc Cancer202020(1):1127.
[6]
Raimundez EKeller SZwingenberger G,et al. Model-based analysis of response and resistance factors of cetuximab treatment in gastric cancer cell lines[J]. Plos Comput Biol202016(3):e1007147.
[7]
Zhang JPang XLei L,et al. LncRNA CRART16/miR-122-5p/FOS axis promotes angiogenesis of gastric cancer by upregulating VEGFD expression[J]. Aging(Albany NY)202214(9):4137-4157.
[8]
Maron SBXu JJanjigian YY. Targeting EGFR in Esophagogastric Cancer[J]. Front Oncol202010:553876.
[9]
Lv JGuo TQu X,et al. PD-L1 Under Regulation of miR-429 Influences the Sensitivity of Gastric Cancer Cells to TRAIL by Binding of EGFR[J]. Front Oncol202010:1067.
[10]
Nakamura YSasaki AYukami H,et al. Emergence of Concurrent Multiple EGFR Mutations and MET Amplification in a Patient With EGFR-Amplified Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated With Cetuximab[J]. JCO Precis Oncol20204:PO.20.00263.
[11]
Ebert KZwingenberger GBarbaria E,et al. Determining the effects of trastuzumab,cetuximab and afatinib by phosphoprotein,gene expression and phenotypic analysis in gastric cancer cell lines[J]. Bmc Cancer202020(1):1039.
[12]
Yamaguchi KFuse NKomatsu Y,et al. Phase II study of cetuximab plus S-1/cisplatin therapy in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol202151(6):879-885.
[13]
Ma HWu JZhou M,et al. Inhibition of Glutamine Uptake Improves the Efficacy of Cetuximab on Gastric Cancer[J]. Integr Cancer Ther202120:15357354211045349.
[14]
Xin LTang FSong B,et al. Objective Quantitation of EGFR Protein Levels using Quantitative Dot Blot Method for the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients[J]. J Gastric Cancer202121(4):335-351.
[15]
Tachibana TYoshii YMatsumoto H,et al. Efficacy of vorinostat-sensitized intraperitoneal radioimmunotherapy with(64)Cu-labeled cetuximab against peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer in a mouse model[J]. J Cancer Res Ther202218(4):907-914.
[1] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[2] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[3] 闫笑生, 郑智, 翟育豪, 张海翘, 王鈢, 刘小野, 尹杰, 张军. Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌临床诊断、病理特征及预后分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 346-351.
[4] 王龙彪, 刘洪, 董天雄. 中心体扩增细胞占比和C反应蛋白-白蛋白比值对胃癌根治术治疗预后的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 352-356.
[5] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[6] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[7] 王鸿彬, 何晓, 吴菁宙. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中背驮式间置空肠单通道重建术在AEG手术的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 526-529.
[8] 宋钰, 赵阳, 王惠君, 廖新华. 术前BMI与可切除胃癌患者术后远期生存的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-533.
[9] 高静, 严学倩, 及月茹, 郝淼旺, 刘苍春. 胃癌患者以慢性贫血为首发表现的高危因素Logistic分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 534-537.
[10] 张彬, 贾贵清, 吴东松, 曹绿洲, 张焰凌, 黄灏, 赵高平. 早期胃癌保功能手术治疗13例病例分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 575-579.
[11] 季加孚, 苏昊, 季科. 不断推进中国腹腔镜胃癌外科手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 355-359.
[12] 韦静涛, 季鑫, 步召德, 季加孚. 早期胃癌腹腔镜功能保留手术与淋巴结清扫规范[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 360-363.
[13] 于恒, 陆晓峰, 宋鹏, 毛永欢, 孙锋, 艾世超, 王峰, 陶亮, 胡琼源, 王萌, 刘颂, 王琼, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 胃癌肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 375-379.
[14] 潘玉霞, 魏曼莉, 魏金鑫, 董云生. SPLT联合间置空肠双通道吻合在腹腔镜近端胃切除术中的近期疗效和生活质量研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 380-384.
[15] 夏添明, 许震, 王云帅, 李朝辉, 韩保卫. 两个“半荷包”缝合包埋法加固十二指肠残端在胃癌根治术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 389-392.
阅读次数
全文


摘要