切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 423 -426. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.04.020

论著

血流拓扑学肝分段与Couinaud肝分段在原发性肝癌术前评估及手术规划中的应用价值
董奕琦1, 罗耀兵1,(), 刘涛2, 张岚3, 杨明3   
  1. 1. 445000 湖北恩施,恩施土家族苗族自治州民族医院急诊科
    2. 445000 湖北恩施,恩施土家族苗族自治州民族医院普外科
    3. 445000 湖北恩施,恩施土家族苗族自治州民族医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-01 出版日期:2022-07-14
  • 通信作者: 罗耀兵

Application value of blood flow topology liver segmentation and Couinaud liver segmentation in preoperative evaluation and surgical planning of primary liver cancer

Yiqi Dong1, Yaobing Luo1,(), Tao Liu2, Lan Zhang3, Ming Yang3   

  1. 1. Department of Emergency,Ethnic Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecturet,Enshi Hubei Province 445000,China
    2. Department of General Surgery,Ethnic Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecturet,Enshi Hubei Province 445000,China
    3. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Ethnic Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecturet,Enshi Hubei Province 445000,China
  • Received:2021-04-01 Published:2022-07-14
  • Corresponding author: Yaobing Luo
  • Supported by:
    Scientific Research Project of Hubei Health and Family Planning Commission(WJ2019F151)
引用本文:

董奕琦, 罗耀兵, 刘涛, 张岚, 杨明. 血流拓扑学肝分段与Couinaud肝分段在原发性肝癌术前评估及手术规划中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 423-426.

Yiqi Dong, Yaobing Luo, Tao Liu, Lan Zhang, Ming Yang. Application value of blood flow topology liver segmentation and Couinaud liver segmentation in preoperative evaluation and surgical planning of primary liver cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 423-426.

目的

探讨血流拓扑学肝分段与Couinaud肝分段在原发性肝癌术前评估及手术规划中的应用价值。

方法

前瞻性纳入2018年1月至2020年6月收治的100例原发性肝癌患者,采用随机数字表法分为:Couinaud组(Couinaud肝分段进行术前评估及手术规划)和血流拓扑学组(血流拓扑学肝分段进行术前评估及手术规划),每组各50例。数据应用软件SPSS 22.0处理,围手术期相关指标等计量资料采用(

xˉ
±s)表示,组间行独立样本t检验;术后并发症等计数资料行χ2检验;生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法并行Log-Rank检验。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

血流拓扑学组手术时间、术中出血量、术中输血量及术后住院时间优于Couinaud组(P<0.05);血流拓扑学组模拟切除肝体积及实际切除体积均显著低于Couinaud组(P<0.05);与模拟切除肝体积相比,Couinaud组实际切除肝体积降低更为显著(P<0.05)。两组患者术后总并发症发生率(20.0% vs. 12.0%)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,两组患者累积总生存率及无病生存率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

与Couimud肝分段相比,血流拓扑学肝分段能更准确的预测切除肝体积,指导术中精准操作,不仅能够缩短手术时间,减少损伤,而且也有利于患者术后恢复,且预后良好。

Objective

To evaluate the value of blood flow topological liver segmentation and Couinaud liver segmentation in preoperative evaluation and surgical planning of primary liver cancer.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with primary liver cancer admitted from January 2018 to June 2020 were prospectively enrolled and divided into Couinaud group(Couinaud liver segmentation for preoperative evaluation and surgical planning)and blood flow topology group(blood flow topology liver segmentation for preoperative evaluation and surgical planning)according to random number table method,with 50 patients in each group. SPSS 22.0 was used for data analysis. Perioperative related indexes were expressed by(

xˉ
±s),and independent t test was performed between groups. Postoperative indicators and other measurement data were conted by χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier parallel Log-Rank test was used for survival analysis. P<0.05 indicated statistical difference.

Results

The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative blood transfusion and postoperative hospital stay in the blood flow topology group were better than those in the Couinaud group(P<0.05). The simulated liver volume and actual resected liver volume in the hematological topology group were significantly lower than those in the Couinaud group(P<0.05). Compared with the simulated resected liver volume,actual hepatectomy volume decreased more significantly in Couinaud group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(20.0%vs.12.0%),P>0.05.Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in cumulative overall survival and disease-free survival between 2 groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with couimud liver segmentation,blood flow topology liver segmentation can more accurately predict the volume and guide accurate operation during operation. It can not only shorten the operation time and reduce injury,but also benefit the postoperative recovery of patients with good prognosis.

表1 100例PLC不同术前评估方法两组患者一般资料比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
表2 100例PLC不同术前评估方法两组患者围手术期相关指标(
xˉ
±s)
表3 100例PLC不同术前评估方法两组患者术后并发症发生情况[例(%)]
图1 100例PLC患者不同术前评估方法两组患者累积总生存和累积无病生存曲线
[1]
Siegel RLMiller KDJemal A. Cancer statistics,2019[J]. CA Cancer J Clin201969(1):7-34.
[2]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局. 原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2019年版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志202019(1):1-20.
[3]
Zhao DLau WYZhou W,et al. Impact of three-dimensional visualization technology on surgical strategies in complex hepatic cancer[J]. Biosci Trends201812(5):476-483.
[4]
成超,彭彬,贾守洪. 三维重建技术辅助的肝切除术对肝癌患者的价值分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(4):381-384.
[5]
Garg SKumar KHSahni D,et al. Anatomy of the hepatic arteries and their extrahepatic branches in the human liver:A cadaveric study[J]. Ann Anat2020227:151409.
[6]
胡文豪,王洪东,沈超楹,等. 解剖性与非解剖性肝切除治疗原发性肝细胞癌临床疗效对比[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志201923(3):172-178.
[7]
Lebre MAVacavant AGrand-Brochier M,et al. Automatic segmentation methods for liver and hepatic vessels from CT and MRI volumes,applied to the Couinaud scheme[J]. Comput Biol Med2019110:42-51.
[8]
Cai WHe BHu M,et al. A radiomics-based nomogram for the preoperative prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Surg Oncol201928:78-85.
[9]
Orcutt S TAnaya DA. Liver Resection and Surgical Strategies for Management of Primary Liver Cancer[J]. Cancer Control201825(1):1073274817744621.
[10]
张鹭,江建宁. 原发性肝癌发病机制和治疗的最新进展[J]. 肝脏202025(5):455-458.
[11]
陈子祥,陈江明,谢青松,等. 肝切除术后肝功能衰竭的防治及研究进展[J]. 肝胆外科杂志202028(3):237-240.
[12]
Khan ASGarcia-Aroz SAnsari MA,et al. Assessment and optimization of liver volume before major hepatic resection:Current guidelines and a narrative review[J]. Int J Surg201852:74-81.
[13]
Ke JLiu FLiu Y. Glissonean pedicle transection with hepatic vein exclusion for hepatocellular carcinoma:a comparative study with the pringle maneuver[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A202030(1):58-63.
[14]
中华医学会数字医学分会,中国医师协会肝癌专业委员会,中国医师协会精准医学专业委员会,等. 原发性肝癌三维可视化技术操作及诊疗规范(2020版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志202019(9):897-918.
[1] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[2] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[3] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[4] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[5] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[6] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[7] 胡森焱, 徐冬, 方健, 谢冬冬, 王财庆. ICG荧光显影Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 513-516.
[8] 林巧, 周丽. RFA联合LAH术治疗原发性肝癌并门静脉癌栓的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 521-524.
[9] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[10] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[11] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[12] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[13] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[14] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
[15] 广东省护士协会介入护士分会, 广东省医师协会介入医师分会. 原发性肝癌低血糖患者护理规范管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 709-714.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?