切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 315 -318. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.03.022

论著

结直肠癌No.253淋巴结转移的危险因素及对预后的影响
孙号1,(), 谢贻祥1, 王永森1   
  1. 1. 237000 安徽六安,安徽医科大学附属六安医院(六安市人民医院)结直肠肛门外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-12 出版日期:2022-04-26
  • 通信作者: 孙号

Risk factors and prognostic effects of No.253 lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer

Hao Sun1,(), Yixiang Xie1, Yongsen Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal anal Surgery,Liu’an Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University(Liu’an Municipal People’s Hospital),Liu’an Anhui Province 237000,China
  • Received:2021-05-12 Published:2022-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Hao Sun
  • Supported by:
    Key research and development project of Anhui(202004j07020003)
引用本文:

孙号, 谢贻祥, 王永森. 结直肠癌No.253淋巴结转移的危险因素及对预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 315-318.

Hao Sun, Yixiang Xie, Yongsen Wang. Risk factors and prognostic effects of No.253 lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 315-318.

目的

探讨结直肠癌No.253淋巴结转移的危险因素及对预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年12月168例直肠癌及乙状结肠癌患者的临床资料。通过单因素和多因素分析结直肠癌No.253淋巴结转移的危险因素。应用软件SPSS 22.0处理数据,单因素分析采用χ2检验,对具有统计意义的单因素分析结果行多因素Logistic回归分析,生存情况采用Kaplan-Meier法并行Log-Rank检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

168例结直肠癌患者中,No.253淋巴结转移20例(11.9%)。多因素分析结果显示,术前梗阻、分化程度低及脉管瘤栓是结直肠癌No.253淋巴结转移的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。术后平均随访25个月,Kaplan-Meier分析显示,转移组的累积总生存率(75.0% vs. 92.6%,P=0.000)及无病生存率(65.0% vs. 91.9%,P=0.000)显著低于非转移组。

结论

术前梗阻、分化程度低及脉管瘤栓与结直肠癌No.253淋巴结转移密切相关,且伴有No.253淋巴结转移的结直肠癌患者预后较差。

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of No.253 lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 168 patients with rectal cancer and sigmoid colon cancer from January 2017 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors of No.253 lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. SPSS 22.0 software was used to process the data,χ2 test was used for univariate analysis,multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed for statistical univariate analysis,and Kaplan-Meier method was used for Log-Rank test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Among 168 patients of colorectal cancer,20 cases(11.9%)had No.253 lymph node metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative obstruction,low differentiation degree and vascular tumor thrombus were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer No. 253(P<0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative overall survival rate(75.0% vs. 92.6%,P=0.000)and disease-free survival rate(65.0% vs. 91.9%,P=0.000)in the metastasis group were significantly lower than those in the non-metastasis group after a mean follow-up of 25 months.

Conclusion

Preoperative obstruction,low degree of differentiation and vascular tumor thrombus are closely related to No.253 lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer,andpatients with No.253 lymph node metastasis had a poor prognosis.

表1 168例CRC患者临床特性与No.253淋巴结转移单因素分析(例)
表2 结直肠癌患者No.253淋巴结转移的多因素分析
图1 168例CRC患者No.253淋巴结转移组和非转移组累积总生存曲线和累积无病生存曲线
[1]
Dekker ETanis PJVleugels JLA,et al. Colorectal cancer[J]. Lancet2019394(10207):1467-1480.
[2]
Wu CLi MMeng H,et al. Analysis of status and countermeasures of cancer incidence and mortality in China[J]. Sci China Life Sci201962(5):640-647.
[3]
陈崇彬,李树斌,沈玲. 结直肠癌患者病理特征与预后的相关性分析[J]. 中国肛肠病杂志201939(10):1-3.
[4]
Díaz-Tasende J. Colorectal cancer screening and survival[J]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig2018110(11):681-683.
[5]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志202040(6):601-625.
[6]
Hashiguchi YMuro KSaito Y,et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum(JSCCR)guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Clin Oncol202025(1):1-42.
[7]
燕速,马新福,赵康,等. 低位直肠癌常规行No.253淋巴结清扫的争议与共识[J]. 中国实用外科杂志202040(3):315-322.
[8]
所剑,国瑀辰,李伟. 腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴节结清扫技巧及疗效评价[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201812(1):5-8.
[9]
Jin MFrankel WL. Lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer[J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am201827(2):401-412.
[10]
赵轩,孙晶. 直肠癌和乙状结肠癌根治术中肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结清扫的相关热点问题及研究进展[J]. 中国肿瘤外科杂志201810(5):278-282.
[11]
袁建,姚磊,屈兵. 直肠癌肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结转移的预测模型构建及准确性验证[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(1):31-34.
[12]
Preisser Fvan den Bergh RCNGandaglia G,et al. Effect of extended pelvic lymph node dissection on oncologic outcomes in patients with D'Amico intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy:a multi-institutional study[J]. J Urol2020203(2):338-343.
[13]
骆洋,陈建军,秦骏,等. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中肠系膜下动脉低位结扎对第3站淋巴结清扫的影响及第3站淋巴结转移危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志201817(2):154-160.
[14]
王权,佟伟华,张加鑫. 左半结肠癌行No.223,No.253淋巴结清扫意义及争议[J]. 中国实用外科杂志202040(3):284-287.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[6] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[7] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[8] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[9] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[10] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[11] 王国强, 张纲, 唐建坡, 张玉国, 杨永江. LINC00839 调节miR-17-5p/WEE1 轴对结直肠癌细胞增殖、凋亡和迁移的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 491-499.
[12] 王湛, 李文坤, 杨奕, 徐芳, 周敏思, 苏珈仪, 王亚丹, 吴静. 炎症指标在早发性结直肠肿瘤中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 802-810.
[13] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[14] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要