切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 426 -429. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.04.020

论著

不同入路右半结肠癌扩大根治术治疗结肠肝曲癌配对研究
王润之1,(), 孙强1   
  1. 1. 236029 安徽阜阳,阜阳市第二人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-27 出版日期:2021-08-17
  • 通信作者: 王润之

Comparative research of laparoscopic radical resection in treating right colon cancers with different approaches

Runzhi Wang1,(), Qiang Sun1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Second People’s Hospital of Fuyang City, Fuyang, Anhui 236029, China
  • Received:2020-08-27 Published:2021-08-17
  • Corresponding author: Runzhi Wang
  • Supported by:
    Anhui Science and Technology Project(1701042301); Key Projects of Medical Science Research of Anhui Health Department(2018A039)
引用本文:

王润之, 孙强. 不同入路右半结肠癌扩大根治术治疗结肠肝曲癌配对研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 426-429.

Runzhi Wang, Qiang Sun. Comparative research of laparoscopic radical resection in treating right colon cancers with different approaches[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(04): 426-429.

目的

研究腹腔镜辅助下尾侧中央入路右半结肠癌扩大根治术治疗结肠肝曲癌患者的临床效果。

方法

选取2017年1月至2019年6月均行腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌扩大根治术的50例结肠肝曲癌患者,根据手术入路不同,按照病例匹配法将患者分为尾侧组(n=25)和传统组(n=25),尾侧组行腹腔镜辅助尾侧中央入路,传统组行腹腔镜辅助传统中央入路。采用软件SPSS22.0进行统计学分析。围术期各项指标和血液炎症指标等计量资料采用(±s)表示,独立样本t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验;以P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

与传统组围术期指标相比,尾侧组手术时间、排气时间、引流管拔除时间均明显缩短,术中出血量显著减少,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后7 d,尾侧组术后血清CRP、TNF-α、IL-6水平均显著优于中央入路组(P<0.05);尾侧组术后并发症显著低于中央入路组(12.0% vs. 36.0%,P<0.05);随访时间12~49个月,两组患者均无死亡发生,且均未出现复发和远处肿瘤转移。

结论

尾侧中间入路手术治疗结肠肝曲癌患者,具有操作更简便,节约手术时间短、术中出血少、住院时间短、并发症少等优势,安全有效。

Objective

To analyze the clinical outcome of laparoscopic expanded right hemicolectomy through caudal and/or medial approach for right colon carcinoma.

Methods

Clinical data of 50 patients with colon cancers located at liver flexure who underwent laparoscopic expanded right hemicolectomy from January 2017 to June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different surgical approaches, patients were divided into caudal group (n=25) and traditional group (n=25). Patients in the caudal group received laparoscopic surgery through caudal and medial approach, while patients in the traditional group received laparoscopic surgery through medial approach. SPSS22.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Measurement data such as perioperative indexes and blood inflammation indexes were expressed by (±s), and were examined by using independent t test. The statistical data of postoperative complications was examined by using χ2 test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

Compared with the perioperative indicators in the traditional group, the operation time, exhausting time and drainage tube removal time in the caudal group were significantly shortened, and intraoperative bleeding was significantly reduced, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). On the 7th day after surgery, the serum levels of CRP, TNF-α and IL-6 in the caudal group were significantly better than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). Postoperative complications in the caudal group were significantly lower than those in the traditional group (12.0% vs 36.0%, P<0.05). Follow-up ranged from 12 to 49 months, no perioperative death, recurrence and distant tumor metastasis occurred in both 2 groups.

Conclusion

Caudal/medial approach is safe and effective in laparoscopic surgery for patients with colon cancer located at liver flexure, with advantages such as simpler operation, less operative time, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospitalization time, and fewer complications.

表1 50例结肠肝曲癌患者不同手术入路两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 50例结肠肝曲癌患者不同手术入路两组患者围术期指标比较(±s)
表3 50例结肠肝曲癌患者不同手术入路两组并发症发生率比较(例)
表4 50例结肠肝曲癌患者不同手术入路两组炎症反应比较(±s)
[1]
国家卫生计生委医政医管局中华医学会肿瘤学分会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2017年版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(1):92-106.
[2]
王甲南,卢涛,崔大炜,等. 腹腔镜下全结肠系膜切除对右半结肠癌根治术患者手术效果及恢复情况的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志,2020,26(3):38-42.
[3]
Nagasaki T, Akiyoshi T, Fukunaga Y, et al. The Short- and Long-Term Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery in Colon Cancer Patients with Bulky Tumors[J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2019, 23(31)1893-1899.
[4]
阿不都沙拉木·亚力昆,臧潞. 结肠肝曲癌的幽门下淋巴转移及清扫[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2019,22(12):1105-1109.
[5]
Hashiguchi Yojiro, Muro Kei, Saito Yutaka, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2020, 25(1): 1-42.
[6]
吴鹏. 腹腔镜下结肠肝曲癌的幽门下淋巴结清扫[J]. 中国继续医学教育,2018,10(32):79-81.
[7]
Oshiro T, Komori K, Kinoshita T, et al. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with radical lymph node dissection along the superior mesenteric artery using a multidirectional approach[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2019, 62(5): 638.
[8]
中华人民共和国卫生和计划生育委员会医政医管局,中华医学会肿瘤学分会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2017年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志,2018,56(4):241-258.
[9]
An MS, Baik H, Oh SH, et al. Oncological outcomes of complete versus conventional mesocolic excision in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2018, 88(10): E698-E702.
[10]
Cai G, Dai W, Cai S. Present status and future of multi-disciplinary treatment for colorectal cancer[J]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2016, 19(6): 607-611.
[11]
Gervaz P, Usel M, Raptie E, et al. Right colon cancer: Left behind[J]. Eur Journal Surg Oncal, 2016, 42(9): 1343-1349.
[12]
Zhang BY, Jones JC, Briggler AM, et al. Lack of Caudal-Type Homeobox Transcription Factor 2 Expression as a Prognostic Biomarker in Metastatic Colorectal[J]. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2017, 16(2): 124-128.
[13]
余志清,杜江. 尾侧入路与中间入路行腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术临床效果对比[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(4):382-384.
[14]
陈庆永,帅晓明,陈立波. 中间尾侧联合入路行腹腔镜D3淋巴结清扫加完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌合并不全性肠梗阻的安全性和可行性[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(9):1039-1044.
[15]
蔡正昊,刘海山,马君俊,等. 尾侧中间联合入路与传统中间入路腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术临床对比研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2019,39(12):1310-1315.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[3] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[4] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[5] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[6] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[7] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[8] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[9] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[10] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[11] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[12] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[13] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
[14] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[15] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
阅读次数
全文


摘要