切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 306 -309. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.03.020

所属专题: 文献

论著

肝细胞生长因子在乳腺癌新辅助化疗前后的变化及其临床意义
虞小亭1, 刘正人1,(), 谢熠1, 郭小青1, 黄加恒1, 方茂成1   
  1. 1. 330006 南昌大学第一附属医院普外四科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-21 出版日期:2021-06-26
  • 通信作者: 刘正人

Changes and clinical significance of hepatocyte growth factor before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Xiaoting Yu1, Zhengren Liu1,(), Yi Xie1, Xiaoqing Guo1, Jiaheng Huang1, Maocheng Fang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi 330006, China
  • Received:2020-04-21 Published:2021-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhengren Liu
  • Supported by:
    Science and technology research project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education(170081)
引用本文:

虞小亭, 刘正人, 谢熠, 郭小青, 黄加恒, 方茂成. 肝细胞生长因子在乳腺癌新辅助化疗前后的变化及其临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 306-309.

Xiaoting Yu, Zhengren Liu, Yi Xie, Xiaoqing Guo, Jiaheng Huang, Maocheng Fang. Changes and clinical significance of hepatocyte growth factor before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 306-309.

目的

探究肝细胞生长因子(HGF)在乳腺癌新辅助化疗(NAC)前后的表达变化及其与NAC疗效联系。

方法

收集2014年1月至2018年12月收治的120例行2~4周期EC新辅助化疗方案的乳腺癌患者临床资料,采用免疫组织化学法检测NAC前后ER、PR、HER-2、Ki-67及HGF的表达情况。使用SPSS 25.0统计软件分析,各亚组乳腺癌中HGF的阳性表达率等计数资料以例数或率(%)表示,行χ2检验,P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

HGF在乳腺癌中的总体阳性表达率为86.7%(104/120);Luminal B型、HER-2过表达型及三阴型乳腺癌的HGF阳性表达率分别为82.1%(23/28)、86.4%(38/44)、89.6%(43/48),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);NAC总有效率75.0%(90/120),HGF在NAC无效乳腺癌的阳性表达率为83.3%(25/30),其与NAC前HGF的阳性表达率相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); HGF在NAC后有效的Luminal B型、HER-2过表达型以及三阴型乳腺癌的阳性表达率分别为42.9%(6/14)、20.6%(7/34)、11.9%(5/42),其与NAC前HGF的阳性表达率相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

HGF在乳腺癌组织中表达较高,与分子亚型无明显关联,HGF有可能作为乳腺癌NAC临床疗效的预测标志物。

Objective

To investigate the changes of the expression of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer and to analyze the efficacy of NAC.

Methods

From January 2014 to December 2018, clinical data of 120 breast cancer patients received NAC with 2-4 cycle EC regimen were analyzed retrospectively. ER, PR, HER-2, Ki-67 and HGF were detected by immunohistochemistry before and after NAC. Statistical software SPSS 25.0 were used for data analysis, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The overall positive expression rate of HGF in breast cancer was 86.7%(104/120); and the positive rates of Luminal B type, HER-2 overexpression type and triple negative breast cancer were 82.1% (23/28), 86.4% (38/44) and 89.6%(43/48)respectively, with no significant difference in the expression of HGF between different breast cancer subtypes (P>0.05); The overall effective rate of NAC was 75.0%(90/120)while the positive expression rate of HGF in NAC ineffective breast cancer was 83.3%(25/30). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of the positive expression rate of HGF before NAC (P>0.05); The positive expression rate of HGF in NAC effective breast cancer for Luminal B type, HER-2 overexpression type and triple negative breast cancer were 42.9%(6/14), 20.6%(7/34), and 11.9%(5/42) respectively, with significant difference in terms of the positive expression rate of HGF before NAC (P<0.05).

Conclusion

HGF is highly expressed in breast cancer tissues and has no obvious relationship with molecular subtypes. HGF is expected to be a predictor for the efficacy of NAC to breast cancer.

图1 乳腺浸润性导管癌患者HGF免疫组化检测结果(×200)[A:阳性;B:阴性]
表1 120例乳腺癌患者不同分子亚型NAC前HGF阳性表达情况的比较[例(%)]
表2 90例乳腺癌患者不同分子亚型NAC前与NAC有效HGF阳性表达情况的比较[例(%)]
[1]
Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials[J]. Lancet Oncol,2018,19(1): 27-39.
[2]
Echeverria GV, Ge Z, Seth S, et al. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer mediated by a reversible drug-tolerant state[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2019,11(488): eaav0936.
[3]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2018,68(6): 394-424.
[4]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021,71(3): 209-249.
[5]
Nakamura T, Nawa K, Ichihara A. Partial purification and characterization of hepatocyte growth factor from serum of hepatectomized rats[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun,1984,122(3): 1450-1459.
[6]
张钊,何平,张树琦,等. 微卫星不稳定性和肝细胞生长因子对结直肠癌患者生存状况的影响[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2017,11(5): 439-442.
[7]
Moosavi F, Giovannetti E, Saso L, et al. HGF/MET pathway aberrations as diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in human cancers[J]. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci, 2019,56(8): 533-566.
[8]
Pothula SP, Xu Z, Goldstein D, et al. Targeting HGF/c-MET Axis in Pancreatic Cancer[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020,21(23): 9170.
[9]
Aliebrahimi S, Kouhsari SM, Ostad SN,et al. Identification of Phytochemicals Targeting c-Met Kinase Domain using Consensus Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies[J]. Cell Biochem Biophys,2018,76(1-2): 135-145.
[10]
Comoglio PM, Trusolino L, Boccaccio C. Known and novel roles of the MET oncogene in cancer: a coherent approach to targeted therapy[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2018,18(6): 341-358.
[11]
Ho-Yen CM, Jones JL, Kermorgant S. The clinical and functional significance of c-Met in breast cancer: a review[J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2015,17(1): 52.
[12]
李传书,葛述科,高伟,等. 大连市不同型别乳腺癌患者的临床病理特征与生存状况研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2020,14(3): 268-272.
[13]
Xu Z, Zhu C, Chen C, et al. CCL19 suppresses angiogenesis through promoting miR-206 and inhibiting Met/ERK/Elk-1/HIF-1alpha/VEGF-A pathway in colorectal cancer[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2018,9(10): 974.
[14]
Qiu SQ, van Rooijen J, Nienhuis HH, et al. High hepatocyte growth factor expression in primary tumor predicts better overall survival in male breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2020,22(1): 30.
[15]
刘海旺,张宏旭,刘燃,等. HGF、E-cad蛋白在乳腺癌组织中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(12): 7-8.
[16]
崔志超 马杰 王雅琪,等. HER2阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后免疫分型变化的研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2020,14(2): 189-192.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[13] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[14] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[15] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
阅读次数
全文


摘要