切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 302 -305. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.03.019

所属专题: 文献

论著

前哨淋巴结活检在乳腺癌手术中的临床意义研究
唐琴1, 朱际飚1,(), 孙劲松1, 王光庆1, 陈飞1, 吕刚1, 刘亚晨1   
  1. 1. 238000 安徽医科大学附属巢湖医院甲乳外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-07 出版日期:2021-06-26
  • 通信作者: 朱际飚

Clinical significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery

Qin Tang1, Jibiao Zhu1,(), Jinsong Sun1, Guangqing Wang1, Fei Chen1, Gang Lvy1, Yachen Liu1   

  1. 1. Breast surgery Dept, Chaohu Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Anhui Province 238000
  • Received:2020-09-07 Published:2021-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Jibiao Zhu
  • Supported by:
    Anhui University Natural Science Key Research Project(SK2019A0157); Key R & D and Development Projects for Anhui Province in 2018(1804H0203021)
引用本文:

唐琴, 朱际飚, 孙劲松, 王光庆, 陈飞, 吕刚, 刘亚晨. 前哨淋巴结活检在乳腺癌手术中的临床意义研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 302-305.

Qin Tang, Jibiao Zhu, Jinsong Sun, Guangqing Wang, Fei Chen, Gang Lvy, Yachen Liu. Clinical significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 302-305.

目的

探究乳腺癌改良根治术与保留腋窝淋巴结的乳腺癌手术的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2017年4月至2019年4月手术治疗的经前哨淋巴结活检为阴性早期乳腺癌患者共计61例。根据术式不同将患者分为两组,改良组35例患者行乳腺癌改良根治术,保腋组26例患者行保留腋窝淋巴结的乳腺癌切除手术。临床数据分析使用统计学软件SPSS 24.0,围手术期指标、QLQ-BR23评分等计量资料采用(±s)表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验;Kaplan-Meier法绘制无病生存曲线,Log-rank检验分析生存率差异。以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

保腋组手术时间、术中出血量、拔管时间及引流量均少于改良组(P<0.05);改良组并发症发生率为34.2%明显多于保腋组为11.5%(P<0.05);两组患者术后1年QLQ-BR23评分比较,保腋组在形体评分、副反应及上肢症状评分中均明显优于改良组(P<0.05);术后随访14~38个月,中位随访时间27个月。随访期间,两组无病生存率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

前哨淋巴结阴性的早期乳腺癌患者行保腋根治术,可减少术后并发症的发生,改善生活质量,且对远期预后无明显影响,值得临床应用。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of modified radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node preservation for breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 61 patients with negative early breast cancer treated surgical treatment between April 2017 and April 2019.The patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods: 35 patients in the improved group received improved radical mastectomy for breast cancer, and 26 patients in the axillary-preserving group received axillary lymph node preserving mastectomy for breast cancer. Clinical data analysis using the statistical software SPSS 24.0, perioperative indicators and QLQ-BR23 score measurement data used (±s) said, comparison between groups use independent sample t test; The statistical data of postoperative complications were tested by χ2 test. The disease-free survival curve was ploted by Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference in survival rate was analyzed by Log-rank test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, extubation time and drainage volume in axil-preserving group were less than those in improved group (P<0.05). The complication rate of improved group (34.2%) was significantly higher than that of axillary protection group (11.5%) (P<0.05). Comparison of The QLQ-BR23 scores one year after operation showed that the axillary preservation group was significantly better than the preservation group in body shape assessment, side effects and upper limb symptoms scores, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The follow-up period ranged from 14 ~ 38 months, and the median follow-up time was 27 months. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival rate between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Axillary preservation radical mastectomy for sentinel lymph node negative patients with early-stage breast cancer can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, improve the quality of life, and has no significant impact on the long-term prognosis, which is worthy of clinical application.

表1 61例早期乳腺癌患者不同术式两组患者临床资料比较[(±s),例]
图1 乳腺癌改良根治术[A:术中血管神经辨识;B:术后腋窝外观及引流]
图3 61例早期乳腺癌患者不同术式两组患者无病生存率比较
表2 61例早期乳腺癌患者不同术式两组围术期指标比较(±s)
表3 61例早期乳腺癌患者不同术式两组术后并发症情况比较(例)
表4 61例早期乳腺癌患者不同术式两组术后生活质量评价(±s)
[1]
段学宁.乳腺癌手术治疗百年历史回顾与启示[J].中国实用外科杂志,2018,38(11): 1227-1231.
[2]
Harbeck N, Gnant M.Breast cancer [J]. Lancet,2017,389(10074): 1134-1150.
[3]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2019年版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2019,29(8): 609-679.
[4]
杨小军,唐海利,樊东,等.乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结转移的预测模型构建[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2020,14(6): 612-615.
[5]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I,et al.Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries[J].CA CANCER J CLIN,2018,68(6): 394-424.
[6]
王宁,刘硕,杨雷,等.2018全球癌症统计报告解读[J/CD].肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志,2019,5(1): 87-97.
[7]
Zaenger D, Rabatic BM, Dasher B,et al.Is Breast Conserving Therapy a Safe Modality for Early-Stage Male Breast Cancer?[J].Clin Breast Cancer,2016,16(2): 101-104.
[8]
Spatuzzi R, Vespa A, Lorenzi P,et al.Evaluation of Social Support, Quality of Life, and Body Image in Women with Breast Cancer[J].Breast Care(Basel),2016,11(1): 28-32.
[9]
唐小乔,苏磊,桑剑锋.乳腺癌改良根治术后上肢淋巴水肿与腋窝淋巴结阳性率的相关性分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2020,14(1): 74-77.
[10]
富泽龙,田利,张承玉,等.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检术中探索腋窝新分区的临床分析[J].中华医学杂志,2020,100(30): 2363-2366.
[11]
闫静.乳腺癌患者术后生活质量现状及影响因素研究[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(16): 2799-2801.
[12]
Li Y, Pan H-F, Sun G-L.Effect of modified surgical method on subcutaneous hydrops of patients with breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy [J].Journal of Hainan Medical University,2016,22(2): 79-83.
[13]
Gass J, Dupree B, Pruthi S,et al.Breast Cancer Survivorship: Why, What and When?[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2016,23(10): 3162-3167.
[14]
李福平,王茂,刘超,等.保留乳头乳晕复合体的乳腺癌改良根治术预后的相关因素分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2020,14(6): 608-611.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要