切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 61 -64. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.01.018

所属专题: 文献

论著

下腔静脉右侧入路建立肝脏悬吊系统的腹腔镜右半肝切除术的临床研究
王瑶1,(), 肖凤鸣1, 吴孟航1, 万娟1   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西医院肝脏外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-11 出版日期:2021-02-10
  • 通信作者: 王瑶

Clinical investigation of laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy with a liver suspension system by using the right inferior vena cava approach

Yao Wang1,(), Fengming Xiao1, Menghang Wu1, Juan Wan1   

  1. 1. Department of liver surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University / West China College of nursing, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Received:2020-05-11 Published:2021-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Yao Wang
  • Supported by:
    Project of Sichuan Provincial Health Department(19PJ240)
引用本文:

王瑶, 肖凤鸣, 吴孟航, 万娟. 下腔静脉右侧入路建立肝脏悬吊系统的腹腔镜右半肝切除术的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 61-64.

Yao Wang, Fengming Xiao, Menghang Wu, Juan Wan. Clinical investigation of laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy with a liver suspension system by using the right inferior vena cava approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 61-64.

目的

研究肝细胞癌腹腔镜右半肝切除术中从下腔静脉右侧入路建立肝脏悬吊技术可行性及安全性。

方法

选取2017年3月至2019年3月间120例行腹腔镜右半肝切除术(LRH)的肝癌患者进行前瞻性随机对照研究。随机分为2组,一组行传统LRH(传统组,n=60),另一组从下腔静脉右侧入路建立肝脏悬吊系统行LRH(悬吊组,n=60)。采用软件SPSS17.0进行统计学分析。围术期各项指标等计量资料以(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症、术后生存率计数资料以%表示,采用χ2检验分析;以P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者围术期均未发生死亡病例;悬吊组手术时间、肝门Pringle阻断时间、术中出血量、术中输血例数均明显少于传统组(P<0.05);两组中转开放、切缘大小、住院时间、术后并发症发生率和术后复发率相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);传统组术后6个月生存率(76.7%)低于于悬吊组(92.0%),12个月生存率(58.3%)也低于悬吊组(78.3%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

从下腔静脉右侧入路建立肝脏悬吊系统的LRH能够充分显露肝断面,有效降低出血,缩短手术时间,安全有效。

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and safety of establishing a liver suspension system by using the right inferior vena cava approach in laparoscopic right hepatectomy for HCC.

Methods

From March 2017 to March 2019, 120 patients with liver cancer underwent laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) were enrolled into present prospective randomized controlled study. Patients were randomly divided into traditional group (n=60), and suspension group (n=60), while patients in traditional group received traditional LRH, and patients in suspension group received LRH with the establishment of a liver suspension system by using the right inferior vena cava approach. SPSS18.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The measurement data, such as relevant indicators in perioperative period, were expressed as(±s) and were analyzed by using independent sample t test. Count data such as postoperative complications and postoperative recurrence rate were expressed as % and were analyzed by using χ2 test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

There was no perioperative death in both two groups. The operation time, hepatic portal Pringle blocking time, intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion cases in suspension group were significantly less than those in traditional group respectively (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of conversion rate to open operation, incision margin size, hospitalization time, incidence of postoperative complications and postoperative recurrence rate (P>0.05). The 6-month survival rate of 76.7% in traditional group was lower than 92.0% in suspension group. The 12-month survival rate of 58.3% in traditional group was also lower than 78.3% in suspension group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic right hepatectomy with a liver suspension system by using the right inferior vena cava approach could fully expose the liver cross-section, could effectively reduce bleeding, and could shorten the operation time, which is safe and effective.

表1 120例行LRH的肝癌患者不同术式两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 120例行LRH的肝癌患者不同术式两组患者围术期相关指标比较(±s)
表3 120例行LRH的肝癌患者不同术式两组患者外科并发症比较(例)
表4 120例行LRH的肝癌患者不同术式两组患者术后复发率和生存率比较[例(%)]
[1]
Tozzi F, Berardi G, Vierstraete M,et al. Laparoscopic Formal Right and Left Hepatectomy vs Open Approach: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(8): 2627-2634.
[2]
刘杰,张成武,洪德飞,等.腹腔镜前入路右半肝切除术治疗右肝巨大肿瘤[J].中华普通外科杂志,2017,32(7): 581-584.
[3]
Reich H, McGlynn F, DeCaprio J,et al.Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions[J]. Obstetrics Gynecol,1991,78(5 Pt 2): 956-958.
[4]
Kwon CHD, Choi GS, Joh JW.Laparoscopic right hepatectomy for living donor[J].Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2019, 24(2): 167-174.
[5]
Tang J-X, Li J-J, Weng R-H, et al. Anterior vs conventional approach right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2017, 23(44): 7917-7929.
[6]
Kim JH.Three-Dimensional Ventral Approach with the Modified Liver-Hanging Maneuver During Laparoscopic Right Hemihepatectomy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019,26(7): 2253.
[7]
吴钧,殷凯,许建伟,等.前入路联合悬吊法切除右肝大肝癌的疗效分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2019, 34(9): 787-790.
[8]
刘爱祥,王海清,薄文滔,等.肝细胞癌肝切除术的临床疗效及预后因素分析[J].中华消化外科杂志,2019, 18(4): 368-374.
[9]
Hong SK, Suh K-S, Kim H-S, et al. Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy in a patient with situs inversus totalis: A case report[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(34): e7910.
[10]
Torres OJM, Neiva RF, Torres CCS, et al. Right hepatectomy due to hepatolithiasis caused by endoclip migration after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report[J]. J Surg Case Rep, 2018,7: rjy176.
[11]
Kim S, Han H-S, Choi YR,et al. Laparoscopic removal of retroperitoneal tumor with maneuver of hanging inferior vena cava[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018,32(7): 3401.
[12]
Cai L-X, Wei F-Q, Yu Y-C, et al. Can retrohepatic tunnel be quickly and easily established for laparoscopic liver hanging maneuver by Goldfinger dissector in laparoscopic right hepatectomy[J]. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2016,17(9): 712-721.
[13]
Lee J--M, Lee K-W, Hong SK,et al.Comparative Study of Pure Laparoscopic Donor Right Hemihepatectomy and Open Donor Right Hemihepatectomy in Patients with Separate Right Anterior and Right Posterior Portal Veins[J]. Transplantation,2018,102(10): S897.
[14]
计勇,余思,杨平,等.一种新的肝脏悬吊方式在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(8): 917.
[15]
卢鹏,纪文斌,王宏光.腹腔镜下右半肝切除手术流程[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2019,25(2): 141-144.
[16]
Chen T-H, Yang H-R, Jeng L-B,et al.Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Experience of 436 Cases in One Center[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2019,23(10): 1949-1956.
[17]
Guro H, Cho JY, Han H-S,et al.Outcomes of major laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Surg Oncol,2018,27(1): 31-35.
[18]
Noni T, Hokuto D, Yoshikawa T,et al.A Novel Navigation for Laparoscopic Anatomic Liver Resection Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2018,25(13): 3982.
[1] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 冯冰, 邹秋果, 梁振波, 卢艳明, 曾奕, 吴淑苗. 老年非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与分子生物学指标的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-51.
[9] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[10] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[11] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[12] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[13] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[14] 钱龙, 陆晓峰, 王行舟, 杜峻峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 神经系统调控胃肠道肿瘤免疫应答研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 86-89.
[15] 叶晓琳, 刘云飞, 庞明泉, 王海久, 任利, 侯立朝, 于文昊, 王志鑫, 樊海宁. 肝再生细胞来源及调控机制的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 96-99.
阅读次数
全文


摘要