切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 491 -494. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.05.018

所属专题: 文献

论著

远端胃癌根治术中两种消化道重建方式的效果研究
陈宝胜1,(), 刘雅刚1, 张吉水1, 宋哲1, 马秋桐1   
  1. 1. 061000 河北沧州,沧州市中心医院普通外二科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-04 出版日期:2020-10-26
  • 通信作者: 陈宝胜

Study on the effect of two kinds of digestive tract reconstruction methods in distal radical gastrectomy

Baosheng Chen1,(), Yagang Liu1, Jishui Zhang1, Zhe Song1, Qiutong Ma1   

  1. 1. Cang zhou City Central Hospital Hebei Cangzhou 061000
  • Received:2020-03-04 Published:2020-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Baosheng Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Baosheng, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Hebei provincial health and family planning commission scientific research program(17000416); Cangzhou key research and development plan to guide the project(183302069)
引用本文:

陈宝胜, 刘雅刚, 张吉水, 宋哲, 马秋桐. 远端胃癌根治术中两种消化道重建方式的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 491-494.

Baosheng Chen, Yagang Liu, Jishui Zhang, Zhe Song, Qiutong Ma. Study on the effect of two kinds of digestive tract reconstruction methods in distal radical gastrectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 491-494.

目的

研究优先离断十二指肠的两种消化道重建方式在全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2016年6月行全腹腔镜下行远端胃癌根治术的远端胃癌患者43例。根据胃十二指肠切除吻合技术的不同,将使用三枚直线切割吻合器的23例患者设为三枚组,使用四枚直线切割吻合器的20例患者设为四枚组。使用统计学软件SPSS 24.0进行临床数据分析,两组围术期各项指标等计量资料以(±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症及3年生存率采用χ2检验。P<0.05为检验标准。

结果

两组患者均成功完成手术。四枚组手术时间、吻合时间均较三枚组短(P<0.05),术中出血量、术后首次排气时间及术后住院时间两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);三枚组术后并发症发生率为13.0%,四枚组发生率为15.0%(P>0.05);术后6个月,三枚组发生倾倒综合征、肠梗阻等近期并发症发生率为17.8%,四枚组为15.0%(P>0.05);三枚组和四枚组患者术后3年生存率分别为56.5%(13/23)及55.0%(11/20),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术中优先离断十二指肠采用四枚直线切割吻合器进行消化道重建,操作更容易掌握,且安全可靠。

Objective

To study the clinical effect of first amputation of duodenum in total laparoscopic distal radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Methods

From January 2014 to June 2016, 43 patients with distal gastric cancer underwent total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different techniques of operation, 23 patients were divided into three-staple cartridge group and 20 patients were divided into four-staple cartridge group. Statistical software SPSS 24.0 was used for data analysis. The perioperative indicators and other measurement data of the two groups were presented as (±s), and the independent sample t test was used for inter-group comparison. The postoperative complications and 3-year survival rate were determined by χ2 test. P<0.05, was the test standard.

Results

The operation was successfully completed in both groups. The operation time and anastomotic time of the four-staple cartridge group were shorter than those of the three-staple cartridge group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). In the comparison of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative first exhaust time and postoperative hospital stay, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 13.0% in the three-pieces group and 15.0% in the four-pieces group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). At 6 months after the operation, the incidence of dumping syndrome, intestinal obstruction and other recent complications was 13.0% in the three-pieces group and 10.0% in the four-pieces group, with no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The 3-year survival rates of the three-pieces group and four-pieces group were 56.5% and 55.0%, There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

In total laparoscopic distal radical gastrectomy first Cut off the duodenal and 4 straight line staple cartridge closures can be used for digestive tract reconstruction. The operation is easier to do and safe and reliable.

表1 43例远端胃癌患者不同术式两组一般临床资料[(±s),例]
表2 43例远端胃癌患者不同术式两组患者围手术期指标比较(±s)
表3 43例远端胃癌患者不同术式两组患者术后并发症发生率比较(例)
[1]
Swanson AJ,Castel LD, Patricia A,et al. Integration of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Screening Tool as a Guidepost for Telephonic Oncology Case Management[J].Professional case management,2019,24(3):148-154.
[2]
孙强,周海洋,胡志前.全腹腔镜下胃癌根治术腔内吻合技术和消化道重建研究进展[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2019,22(2):191-195.
[3]
王楠,何显力. 完全腹腔镜胃癌根治术直线吻合器腔内重建技术[J]. 中华内分泌外科杂志,2019, 13(3):177-180.
[4]
陈心足,胡建昆.胃癌规范化诊疗进展[J].华西医学,2018,33(4):379-384.
[5]
Kanaya S,Gomi T,Momoi H,et al. Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy:new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy[J].J Am Coll Surg,2002,195(2):284-287.
[6]
季加孚,王宇宸,肖琪严.中国胃癌腹腔镜手术临床研究现状[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(2):109-113.
[7]
Wang YK, Li ZY, Shan F,et al.Current status of diagnosis and treatment of early gastric cancer in China-Data from China Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery Union[J].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi,2018,21(2):168-174.
[8]
左婷婷,郑荣寿,曾红梅,等.中国胃癌流行病学现状[J].中国肿瘤临床,2017,44(1):52-58.
[9]
张心阳,郦源,张子臻,等. 病毒感染相关性胃癌的研究现状和进展[J]. 国际外科学杂志,2019, 46(4):254-261.
[10]
李子禹,王胤奎,陕飞,等.早期胃癌治疗的共识与问题[J].中国实用外科杂志,2018,38(2):153-157.
[11]
Kwon IG,Son YG,Ryu SW.Novel Intracorporeal Esophagojejunostomy Using Linear Staplers During Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy:π-Shaped Esophagojejunostomy, 3-in-1 Technique[J].J Am Coll Surg,2016,223(3):e25-e29.
[12]
Lu YM,Lin T,Hu YF, et al. Initial Experience of Dual-Port Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Single-Arm Study[J]. Adv Ther, 2019, 36(9):2342-2350.
[13]
黄昌明,李子禹,臧潞.全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术消化道重建方式选择--Billroth-Ⅰ式、Billroth-Ⅱ式还是Roux-en-Y吻合?[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(9):953-954,957.
[14]
何萍,肖金成,徐勇超,等.直线切割闭合器简化远端胃癌根治消化道重建的临床应用[J].临床医学,2017,37(7):1-3.
[15]
Fukunaga T,Ishibashi Y,Oka S,et al.Augmented rectangle technique for Billroth I anastomosis in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J].Surg Endosc,2018,32(9):4011-4016.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?