切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 438 -440. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.05.002

所属专题: 述评/论坛 总编推荐 文献

专家论坛

3D腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的优劣与利弊
姚宏伟1, 高加勒1, 张忠涛1,()   
  1. 1. 100050 北京,首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-07 出版日期:2020-10-26
  • 通信作者: 张忠涛

Right radical hemicolectomy by using 3D laparoscopy: advantages and disadvantages

Hongwei Yao1, Jiale Gao1, Zhongtao Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, & National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2020-01-07 Published:2020-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhongtao Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Zhongtao, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Key Technologies R&D Program(2015BAI13B09); Beijing key Clinical Discipline Funding(2018-118); Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding(ZYLX201504); Clinical Research Launching Project Funding of Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University(YYQDKT2016-5)
引用本文:

姚宏伟, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 3D腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的优劣与利弊[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 438-440.

Hongwei Yao, Jiale Gao, Zhongtao Zhang. Right radical hemicolectomy by using 3D laparoscopy: advantages and disadvantages[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 438-440.

随着3D技术的发展,3D腹腔镜手术在治疗右半结肠癌中已经得到了广泛的应用,其良好的深度知觉和空间定向力有助于术者进行解剖结构辨认以及精细操作,然而在手术体验方面仍存在眩晕、视觉疲劳方面的问题。在手术治疗效果方面,3D腹腔镜暂未显现出颠覆性的优势,需要进一步的高质量循证医学证据。随着科技的发展,3D腹腔镜的技术缺陷正在逐步完善,未来能否在结肠癌手术领域中成为主流,仍然值得期待。

With the development of 3D technology, 3D laparoscopic surgery has been widely used in the right radical hemicolectomy for colon cancer, with the advantages of depth perception and spatial orientation, and the surgeons could be able to recognize anatomical structure and operate more precisely. However, dizziness and visual fatigue are still problems for surgeons. In terms of the surgical outcomes, 3D laparoscopic surgery has not shown the disruptive advantage, and the further high-quality evidence is still needed. With the development of science and technology, the defects of 3D laparoscopy have been improved, whether it could be main current in the right hemicolectomy still worthy of expectation.

[1]
Biondi A, Grosso G, Mistretta A, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery[J]. BMC Surg, 2013,13(Suppl 2):S12.
[2]
姚宏伟,张忠涛.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的热点与未来发展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(1):1-4.
[3]
郑民华,何子锐.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的热点与未来发展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(5):433-436.
[4]
马君俊,洪希周,何子锐,等. 3D与2D腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中术者主观感受的随机对照研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2016,15(9):892-896.
[5]
Sakata S,Watson MO, Grove PM, et al. The Conflicting Evidence of Three-dimensional Displays in Laparoscopy: A Review of Systems Old and New[J]. Ann Surg, 2016,263(2):234-239.
[6]
Tao KX, Liu XH, Deng MZ, et al. Three-Dimensional Against 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Colectomy for Right-sided Colon Cancer[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2016,26(4):324-327.
[7]
Yoon J, Kang SI, Kim MH, et al. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between 3D and 2D Imaging Laparoscopic Colectomy with D3 Lymphadenectomy for Colon Cancer[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019,29(3):340-345.
[8]
Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Francis NK, et al. The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019,33(10):3251-3274.
[9]
李兴旺,李柄辉,马琳璐,等. 3D腹腔镜辅助结直肠癌手术疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志,2019,19(7):818-827.
[10]
洪希周,马君俊,董峰,等. 3D与2D腹腔镜系统在结直肠癌手术应用的随机对照研究[J]. 腹部外科,2017,30(1):23-26, 35.
[11]
Curro G, Cogliandolo A, Bartolotta M, et al. Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2016,26(3):213-217.
[12]
Su H, Jin W, Wang P, et al. Comparing short-time outcomes of three-dimensional and two-dimensional totally laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer using overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2019,12:669-675.
[13]
Guerrieri M, Campagnacci R, Sperti P, et al. Totally robotic vs 3D laparoscopic colectomy: A single centers preliminary experience[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015,21(46):13152-13159.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[6] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[7] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[8] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[9] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[10] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[11] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[12] 黄怡诚, 陆晨, 孙司正, 喻春钊. 肝特异性转录因子FOXA2在人结直肠癌肝转移阶梯模型中的表达变化及其意义[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 396-403.
[13] 刘祺, 张凯, 李建男, 刘铜军. 结直肠癌肝转移生物治疗的现状及进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 415-419.
[14] 吴寅, 陈智琴, 高勇, 权明. Her-2阳性结直肠癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 420-425.
[15] 孙昕, 程海波, 沈卫星. 基于全转录组学探讨仙连解毒方治疗Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者的疗效机制[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 277-283.
阅读次数
全文


摘要