切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 528 -530. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.05.031

所属专题: 文献

论著

三维腔镜根治术下甲状腺癌治疗的手术入路选取探讨及创口情况比较
周云飞1,()   
  1. 1. 635099 达州市中心医院普胸乳甲外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-11 出版日期:2019-10-26
  • 通信作者: 周云飞

Surgical Approaches for Treatment of Thyroid Cancer Undergoing Three-dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Surgery and Comparison of Wound Conditions

Yunfei Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of chest and breast cancer, Dazhou central hospital 635099
  • Received:2018-08-11 Published:2019-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Yunfei Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Yunfei, Email:
引用本文:

周云飞. 三维腔镜根治术下甲状腺癌治疗的手术入路选取探讨及创口情况比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 528-530.

Yunfei Zhou. Surgical Approaches for Treatment of Thyroid Cancer Undergoing Three-dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Surgery and Comparison of Wound Conditions[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 528-530.

目的

探讨三维腔镜根治术下甲状腺癌治疗手术入路的选取及创口情况的比较。

方法

回顾性分析2014年6月至2017年4月78例行三维腔镜根治术的甲状腺癌患者,根据手术入路分为胸乳入路组与颈前入路组,其中胸乳入路组40例采取胸乳入路,颈前入路组38例采取颈前入路。数据采用SPSS21.0软件进行统计分析,围术期指标等采用(±s)描述,独立t检验;术后并发症,术后切口美观满意度χ2检验分析,P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者的术中出血量、术后引流量、手术时间、住院时间、淋巴结清扫数目和术后声音嘶哑、咳嗽、低钙血症等并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但术后疼痛评分和吞咽困难发生率胸乳入路组明显低于颈前入路组(P<0.05),术后切口美观满意度明显高于颈前入路组(P<0.05)。

结论

胸乳入路三维腔镜甲状腺癌根治术的手术疗效良好,安全可靠,并且术后切口更为美观,值得临床进一步推广。

Objective

To investigate the choice of surgical approach for the treatment of thyroid cancer undergoing three-dimensional laparoscopic radical surgery and compare the wound conditions.

Methods

78 cases of thyroid cancer who underwent three-dimensional laparoscopic surgery in our hospital from June 2014 to April 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical approach, they was divided into thoracic approach group and anterior approach group. Among them, 40 cases of thoracic approach group were given thoracic approach, and 38 cases of anterior approach group were given anterior approach. All data were statistically analyzed using SPSS21.0 software. Perioperative indicators were described using (±s) and compared with independent t test. Postoperative complications and aesthetic satisfaction of postoperative incision were compared by χ2 test. The difference was statistically significant at P<0.05.

Results

There were no significant differences in perioperative indexes between the two groups, such as intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, operation time, length of hospital stay, and number of lymph node dissection (P>0.05). However, postoperative pain scores in the thoracic approach group were significantly lower than those in the anterior cervical approach group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05), while the incidence of dysphagia in the thoracic approach group was significantly lower than that in the anterior approach group (P<0.05). The aesthetic satisfaction of postoperative incisions in the thoracic approach group was significantly higher than that in the anterior cervical approach group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

3D laparoscopic radical thyroidectomy via thoracic approach is effective, safe and reliable. The postoperative incisions are more aesthetically pleasing.It is worthy of further clinical promotion.

表1 78例甲状腺癌患者不同手术路径两组患者基本临床资料比较(例)
表2 78例甲状腺癌患者不同手术路径两组患者的围术期相关指标比较(±s)
表3 78例甲状腺癌患者不同手术路径两组患者的术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 78例甲状腺癌患者不同手术路径两组患者术后切口美观满意度比较[例(%)]
[1]
仉志军,杨兴旺,杨春晓,等.腹腔镜下改良淋巴结清扫术在甲状腺癌中的应用价值[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016, 10(3): 228-230.
[2]
郑庆生,李军政,洪伟雄,等. 经胸乳入路腹腔镜下改良淋巴结清扫术在甲状腺癌中的应用价值[J]. 中国医学创新,2016,13(10): 30-32.
[3]
陈聃. 经乳晕入路腔镜手术与传统开放手术治疗甲状腺肿瘤的临床效果对比[J]. 浙江创伤外科,2017, 22 (5) : 892-893.
[4]
于强,彭世军. 腔镜下行甲状腺癌中央区淋巴结清扫术的手术入路选择及疗效分析[J]. 医学临床研究,2017, 34(12): 2467-2469.
[5]
丁光耀,王强,金实,等. 60例经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺切除术的治疗体会[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2016,21(4): 274-276.
[6]
高新宝,贾高磊,田志龙,等. 全乳晕入路与胸乳入路腔镜手术治疗甲状腺微灶癌的临床比较[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2016,25 (11) : 1550-1556.
[7]
石朝绩,罗永香,郑达武,等. 经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术与传统手术治疗甲状腺良性肿瘤的效果比较[J]. 中国临床新医学,2017, 10 (4) : 356-359.
[8]
王雄,陈熹.颈前小切口入路与改良Miccoli腔镜辅助下手术治疗甲状腺良性肿瘤疗效和安全性比较[J]. 临床外科杂志,2017, 25 (11) : 855-858.
[9]
宋延冰,姚中杨. 乳晕入路全腔镜下甲状腺癌根治术与小切口甲状腺癌根治术的临床对比分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2016, 21 (11) : 804-806.
[10]
陶崇翥,陈卫华,刘彦,等. 全乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺微小乳头状癌根治术:附23例报告[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2017, 26 (11) : 1392-1396.
[11]
樊敦徽,程生林,张军,等. 对比经胸乳入路腔镜、开放手术运用于甲状腺良性肿瘤治疗中的效果[J]. 中国保健营养,2016, 26 (33) : 28-28.
[12]
李婷,刘新梅,耿金秀. 颈前小切口入路与改良Miccoli腔镜辅助下手术治疗甲状腺良性肿瘤的临床研究[J]. 中国医刊,2016 , 51(5) : 68-71.
[13]
苏耀荣,李超,李伟文,等. 腔镜手术治疗分化型甲状腺癌的手术效果、经济性及美观学效果分析[J]. 医学临床研究,2017,34 (7) : 1329-1331.
[14]
张小兵,唐世龙,张万宇,等. 经乳晕入路腔镜手术在甲状腺肿瘤患者中的临床疗效探讨[J]. 临床医学工程,2017 , 24(2): 167-168.
[15]
吴国洋,傅锦波,严威,等. 经胸经口联合入路腔镜下行甲状腺癌中央区淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华外科杂志,2016 , 54 (4) : 297-298.
[16]
王崇高,宋勇罡,潘峰,等.三维腔镜全乳晕入路甲状腺切除术后患者生活质量及美容满意度的分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2016, 21 (4) : 267-270.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?