切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 287 -289. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.03.023

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同手术方式治疗老年结肠癌的临床疗效与细胞免疫状态比较
苏超云1,(), 魏庆忠1, 王钢1, 任谊1, 郭雯1   
  1. 1. 100076 北京,北京航天总医院
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-01 出版日期:2019-06-26
  • 通信作者: 苏超云

Comparison of clinical efficacy and cellular immune status of different surgical methods in the treatment of elderly patients with colon cancer

Chaoyun Su1,(), Qinzhong Wei1, Gang Wang1, Yi Ren1, Wen Guo1   

  1. 1. Beijing aerospace general hospital Beijing 100076
  • Received:2018-07-01 Published:2019-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Chaoyun Su
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Su Chaoyun, Email:
引用本文:

苏超云, 魏庆忠, 王钢, 任谊, 郭雯. 不同手术方式治疗老年结肠癌的临床疗效与细胞免疫状态比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 287-289.

Chaoyun Su, Qinzhong Wei, Gang Wang, Yi Ren, Wen Guo. Comparison of clinical efficacy and cellular immune status of different surgical methods in the treatment of elderly patients with colon cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(03): 287-289.

目的

比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗老年结肠癌的并发症、细胞免疫状态及预后情况。

方法

回顾性分析2014年8月至2017年12月间收治的103例结肠癌老年患者资料,随机分为腹腔镜组(52例)和开腹组(51例),分别给予腹腔镜手术和开腹手术。比较两组患者的并发症发生率、细胞免疫功能及预后情况等指标。数据处理应用统计学软件SPSS22.0完成,并发症发生率采用χ2检验;细胞免疫指标及预后指标等数据用(±s)来表示,组间比较采用独立t检验,P<0.05为差异存在统计学意义。

结果

腹腔镜组并发症发生率为5.8%(3/52)显著低于开腹组19.6%(10/51),(χ2=4.5, P<0.05);术后两组患者的CD3、CD4、CD4/CD8均低于术前(均P<0.05),CD8高于术前(P<0.05);且腹腔镜组的CD3、CD4、CD4/CD8均高于开腹组(均P<0.05),CD8低于开腹组(P<0.05);与开腹组比较,腹腔镜组患者术后止痛药时间短、胃肠功能恢复快、进流质时间早、下床活动时间早、留置导管时间短、住院时间短(均P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜下结肠癌根治术与传统开腹手术相比,能有效降低并发症发生率,对细胞免疫功能的影响较小,缩短术后胃肠道功能恢复时间、下床活动时间及住院时间,有利于患者的预后,符合快速康复的外科理念,值得推广应用。

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy and cellular immune status of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the treatment of elderly patients with colon cancer.

Methods

Clinical data of 103 elderly patients with colon cancer from August 2014 to December 2017 treated in our hospital were selected, and the patients were divided into laparoscopic group (52 cases) and laparotomy group (51 cases) according to the different methods. The incidence of complications, cellular immune function, and prognosis were compared between the two groups.

Results

The incidence of complications in laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that in laparotomy group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); After treatment, CD3, CD4, and CD4/CD8 in both groups were lower than before (P<0.05), and CD8 was higher than before (P<0.05), and CD3, CD4, CD4/CD8 in laparoscopic group were higher than those in laparotomy group (P<0.05), CD8 in laparoscopic group was lower than that in the laparotomy group (P<0.05); Compared with the laparotomy group, patients in the laparoscopic group had shorter postoperative analgesics, more rapid recovery of gastrointestinal function, earlier fluid intake time, earlier ambulation, shorter indwelling catheterization time, and shorter hospitalization time (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with traditional laparotomy surgery, laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer can effectively reduce the incidence of complications, it has little effect on patient’s cellular immune function, it can shorten the recovery time of the postoperative gastrointestinal function, ambulation activity time and hospitalization time, it is beneficial to the prognosis of patients and is consistent with the concept of rapid recovery surgery, it is worthy of promotion and application.

表1 103例老年结肠癌患者不同手术方法两组患者基本资料的比较(例)
表2 103例老年结肠癌患者不同手术方法两组患者并发症发生率的比较[例,%]
表3 103例老年结肠癌患者不同手术方法两组患者细胞免疫状态的比较(±s)
表4 103例老年结肠癌患者不同手术方法两组患者预后情况的比较(±s)
[1]
Masuda T, Kobayashi K, Kakimoto M, et al. [Two Cases of Obstructive Colorectal Cancer Effectively Treated with Colonic Stent Placement][J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2016, 43(12): 1614-1616.
[2]
孙跃明.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术难点与关键技术[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(2):102-104.
[3]
池畔,官国先.不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术规范化水平[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(2):91-94.
[4]
郑民华,马君俊.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的难点与争议[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(3):181-184.
[5]
Park SY, Park JS, Choi GS, et al. Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Laparoscope-Assisted and Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block after Laparoscopic Colorectal Operation: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2017, 225(3): 403-410.
[6]
刘军辉,张学军,赵永灵. 腹腔镜结肠癌手术对患者免疫功能和应激反应影响分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016, 10(2):123-126.
[7]
房俊,崔小鹏,樊勇,等.腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术治疗老年结肠癌患者的近期疗效评价及对机体免疫力的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2017, 17(20):3888-3892.
[8]
秦颖,张海涛,文剑锋,等. 腹腔镜与开腹治疗结肠癌的临床疗效及对机体免疫功能的影响对比[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018,12(1):61-64.
[9]
Kotelevets L, Chastre E, Caron J, et al. A Squalene-Based Nanomedicine for Oral Treatment of Colon Cancer[J]. Cancer Res, 2017, 77(11): 2964-2975.
[10]
卫洪波,黄江龙.腹腔镜右半结肠癌扩大切除术意义的纷争[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(3):189-193.
[11]
Seaman L, Chen H, Brown M, et al. Nucleome Analysis Reveals Structure-Function Relationships for Colon Cancer[J]. Mol Cancer Res, 2017, 15(7): 821-830.
[12]
Saia M, Buja A, Mantoan D, et al. Colon Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study Based on a Large Administrative Database[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2016, 26(6): e126-e131.
[13]
陈平. 腹腔镜根治术与开腹术治疗老年结肠癌患者的术后随访研究[J]. 结直肠肛门外科,2016,22(6):565-568.
[14]
Gray RT, Loughrey MB, Bankhead P, et al. Statin use, candidate mevalonate pathway biomarkers, and colon cancer survival in a population-based cohort study[J]. Br J Cancer, 2017, 116(12): 1652-1659.
[15]
Costi R, Santi C, Bottarelli L, et al. Anastomotic recurrence of colon cancer: Genetic analysis challenges the widely held theories of cancerous cells’ intraluminal implantation and metachronous carcinogenesis[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2016, 114(2): 228-236.
[16]
房俊,崔小鹏,樊勇,等. 腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术治疗老年结肠癌患者的近期疗效评价及对机体免疫力的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2017, 17(20):3888-3892.
[17]
Lamprecht S, Schmidt EM, Blaj C, et al. Multicolor lineage tracing reveals clonal architecture and dynamics in colon cancer[J]. Nat Commun, 2017, 8(1): 1406-1406.
[18]
Phipps AI, Shi Q, Limburg PJ, et al. Alcohol consumption and colon cancer prognosis among participants in North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase III trial N0147[J]. Int J Cancer, 2016, 139(5): 986-995.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要