切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 86 -88. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.01.027

所属专题: 文献

论著

3D与2D腹腔镜胆囊切除联合胆总管探查取石术的应用对比
邬长康1, 李敬东2,(), 毛兴波1, 李伟男1, 权刚1   
  1. 1. 637000 南充,川北医学院附属医院肝胆一科
    2. 637000 南充,川北医学院附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-22 出版日期:2019-02-26
  • 通信作者: 李敬东

Comparison of 3D and 2D laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration

Changkang Wu1, Jingdong Li2,(), Xingbo Mao1, Weinan Li1, Gang Quan1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong Sichuan 637000, China
  • Received:2018-03-22 Published:2019-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Jingdong Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Jingdong, Email:
引用本文:

邬长康, 李敬东, 毛兴波, 李伟男, 权刚. 3D与2D腹腔镜胆囊切除联合胆总管探查取石术的应用对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 86-88.

Changkang Wu, Jingdong Li, Xingbo Mao, Weinan Li, Gang Quan. Comparison of 3D and 2D laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 86-88.

目的

探讨3D腹腔镜胆囊切除联合胆总管探查取石术的治疗效果。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年10月接受腹腔镜胆囊切除+胆总管探查手术治疗的胆道结石患者68例,按照手术方法分为3D腹腔镜组(3D组)和2D腹腔镜组(2D组),采用SPSS20.0软件进行统计学分析。两组患者手术相关指标及术后3个月术后生活质量等计量资料以(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症发生率及随访情况等计数资料以例(%)表示,组间比较采用χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

与2D组相比,3D组患者手术时间及出血量均明显减少(P<0.05),两组在术后引流时间、平均住院时间、住院费用、术后并发生总发生率等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访3~12个月,2D组有1例患者出现结石复发,3D组无结石残留病例;术后3个月生存质量水平3D组显著优于2D组(P<0.05)。

结论

3D腹腔镜技术提高了腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆总管探查取石术的成功率,有助于手术操作的精确,缩短了手术时间,降低术中出血量且不增加并发症发生率,提高了术后生活质量,值得在临床中推广使用。

Objective

To evaluate the effect of 3D laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with choledocholithotomy.

Methods

From 2016 January to 2017 October, 68 cases of cholelithiasis were selected and treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration in our hospital. According to the operation method, the patients were divided into two groups: 3D laparoscopic group (3D group) and 2D laparoscopic group (2D group). Clinical data of the two groups were analyzed by SPSS20.0 software. The related indexes of operation and 3 months after operation in both groups were analyzed. The quantitative data such as the quality of Life scale (QOL) were expressed as (±s) and compared with independent t test, the incidence of postoperative complications and follow-up data were expressed in the number of cases and compared with chi square. A P<0.05 was considered as significant difference.

Results

Compared with 2D group, the operation time and bleeding volume in 3D group were significantly reduced (P<0.05). There were no significant difference in postoperative drainage time, average hospitalization time, hospitalization cost and the incidence of postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in 3~12 months follow-up, 1 patient in 2D group with recurrence of stone was found and no residual stone in 3D group was found. 3 months after operation, the quality of life in 3D group was significantly better than that in 2D group.

Conclusion

The success rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration was improved by 3D laparoscopic technique. It can be helpful to the accuracy of the operation, shorten the operation time, reduce the amount of intraoperative bleeding and does not increase the incidence of complications, which is worth popularizing in clinic.

表1 68例胆道结石患者不同手术方法两组患者一般资料比较(±s)
表2 68例胆道结石患者不同手术方法两组患者手术相关指标比较(±s)
表3 68例胆道结石患者不同手术方法两组患者生活质量评分比较(±s)
[1]
Masuda Y, Mizuguchi Y, Kanda T, et al. Successful treatment of limy bile syndrome extending to the common bile duct by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration: A case report and literature review[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2017, 10(1):59-62.
[2]
陈安平,曾乾桃,周华波,等.腹腔镜下经腹顺行引导法逐级导管乳头扩张术253例[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(2):155-157.
[3]
李震寰,黄卫华,黄晓方,等.腹腔镜联合胆道镜在治疗胆结石患者的临床效果分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(4):313-315.
[4]
别平,杨智清.不断提高肝胆管结石的诊治规范化[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2016,10(6):451-453.
[5]
Lin X, Cai J, Wang J, et al. Minimally Invasive Cholecystolithotomy to Treat Cholecystolithiasis in Children: A Single-center Experience With 23 Cases[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2017, 27(5):e108-e110.
[6]
黎东伟,李君久,熊秋华,等. 3D腹腔镜在胆道手术中应用的初步探索[J]. 中国内镜杂志,2017, 23(3):38-41.
[7]
刘燕南,陈剑,贺修文,等. 3D与2D腹腔镜经胆囊管汇入部微切开胆道探查的对比研究[J]. 中华普通外科杂志,2016, 31(3):224-226.
[8]
马大喜,李可为,王坚,等. LC+LCBDE和ERCP/EST+LC在胆囊合并胆总管结石中应用的随机对照研究[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志,2016, 28(6):448-453.
[9]
田泽阳,徐晨龙,张立.腹腔镜与开腹再次胆道手术治疗胆总管结石的临床对比[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):82-84.
[10]
Yilmaz S, Akici M, Okur N, et al. Spontaneous postoperative choledochoduodenal fistula due to bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, 2016, 25:199-202.
[11]
徐建明,陈学敏. 腹腔镜联合胆总管探查术治疗胆囊并胆总管结石[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(6):483-485.
[12]
傅涛,李佳欢,李汉军,等. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜与开腹行胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石的疗效比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(2):158-161.
[13]
李强,黄勇,雷钧,等. 3D高清腹腔镜在肝外胆总管结石治疗中的应用[J]. 山东医药,2016, 56(10):46-47.
[14]
Yamamoto M, Zaima M, Kida Y, et al. A Novel Procedure for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-The Teres Hanging Technique Combined with Fundus-First, Dome-Down Separation[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg, 2016, 26(12):1003-1009.
[15]
苏泽,黄海,朱懋光,等. 3D腹腔镜在胆道手术中的运用体会[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志,2015, 27(4):329-330.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[11] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[12] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[13] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[14] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[15] 孙秀艳, 徐庆蕾, 马鹏涛, 胡志元, 郭传真, 祝成红. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中患者体温变化与压力性损伤及受压部位微环境的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 480-484.
阅读次数
全文


摘要