切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 119 -121. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.02.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

70岁以上老年胃癌患者行腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术的安全性和可行性
樊建新1,()   
  1. 1. 644000 四川,宜宾市第一人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-25 出版日期:2018-02-26
  • 通信作者: 樊建新

Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic assisted radical gastrectomy for elderly patients over 70 years old with gastric cancer

Jianxin Fan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of general surgery, the First People's Hospital of Yibin city, Sichuan 644000, China
  • Received:2017-10-25 Published:2018-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Jianxin Fan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fan Jianxin, Email:
引用本文:

樊建新. 70岁以上老年胃癌患者行腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术的安全性和可行性[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 119-121.

Jianxin Fan. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic assisted radical gastrectomy for elderly patients over 70 years old with gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 119-121.

目的

探讨70岁以上老年胃癌患者行腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术的安全性和可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2013年3月至2015年3月收治的56例老年胃癌患者临床资料,依据手术方法不同将其分成腹腔镜组与开腹组,各28例。开腹组使用传统开腹手术治疗,腹腔镜组使用腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术,数据采用SPSS18.0统计处理,两组患者术中指标、术后恢复情况等计量资料采用(±s)表示,行独立t检验;两组患者并发症发生率等计数资料使用%表示,行卡方检验,当P<0.05时差异有统计学意义。

结果

腹腔镜组患者术中失血量、术后排气时间及术后住院时间情况显著少于开腹组,P<0.05;两组患者手术时间、淋巴结清扫数目、上下切缘距离差异无统计学意义,P>0.05;腹腔镜组患者术后有6例出现并发症(21.4%),开腹组有10例(35.7%),两组差异无统计学意义,P>0.05;但是腹腔镜组患者切口感染率为3.6%(1/28)显著低于开腹组14.3%(4/28),P<0.05;

结论

70岁以上老年胃癌患者行腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术治疗效果较好,降低了切口感染率,安全可行,值得使用与推广。

Objective

To explore the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients over 70 years old.

Methods

Clinical data of 56 elderly patients with gastric cancer admitted from March 2013 to March 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, 56 patients were divided into laparoscopic group (28 cases) and Laparotomy group (28 cases) respectively. Traditional open surgery were performed in Laparotomy group, while laparoscope were applied in Laparoscopic group. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS18.0 software. Intraoperative and postoperative clinical indicators were presented as mean±standard deviation, and were examined by using t test. The postoperative complication rate were expressed as %, and were compared with χ2 test. P<0.05 was thought to be statistically significant.

Results

Compared with Laparotomy group, there were less intraoperative blood loss, earlier postoperative exhaust time and shorter postoperative hospitalization time in laparoscopic group, with significant difference (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between 2 groups in terms of operation time, number of harvested lymph nodes, distal and proximal dissection margin distance (P>0.05). There were 6 cases of complications (21.4%) in laparoscopic surgery, and 10 cases (35.7%) in laparotomy group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). However, the incision infection rate in the laparoscopic group was 3.6% (1/28), which was significantly lower than 14.3% (4/28) in laparotomy group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Clinical outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer is satisfactory, with decreasing infection rate. which is safe and feasible, and worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 56例老年胃癌患者不同手术方法两组患者一般资料比较(例)
表2 56例老年胃癌患者不同手术方法两组患者术中指标、手术后恢复情况比较(±s)
表3 56例老年胃癌患者不同手术方法两组患者术后并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
[1]
胡建昆,赵林勇.腹腔镜胃癌根治联合脏器切除的现状与发展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(6):457-460.
[2]
孙华朋,张娜,廖晓锋. 70岁以上老年患者腹腔镜胃癌手术安全性的研究[J]. 中国内镜杂志,2013,19(12):1279-1282.
[3]
孙成文. 腹腔镜治疗老年胃癌患者的临床疗程观察[J]. 航空航天医学杂志,2015,26(10):1219-1220.
[4]
刘伟,安杰,侯会池,等. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗老年胃癌患者的疗效及体会[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2013,16(9):738-740.
[5]
吉国锋,季福建,马冲等.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术治疗老年人胃癌临床疗效分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2016,35(3):292-295.
[6]
徐凯,崔明,邢加迪等.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术对老年胃癌患者的临床疗效分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2017,44(16):800-804.
[7]
高福锋. 腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的临床对比研究[D].山东大学,2013.
[8]
Ahmad A, Khan H, Cholankeril G,et al. Somasundar. The impact of age on nodal metastases and survival in gastric cancer[J]. Journal of Surgical Research,2016, 202(2):428-435.
[9]
Pucheanu X, Beuran M. Bleeding gastric cancer in young and elderly patients[J]. Journal of medicine and life,2015,8(3):356-360.
[10]
Li H, Han X, Su L, et al. Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy versus traditional open surgery in elderly patients with gastric cancer: Benefits and complications[J]. Molecular & Clinical Oncology, 2014, 2(4):530-534.
[11]
Yang H, Cui M, Xing J, et al. [Clinical efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer][J]. Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi, 2015, 18(1):21-25.
[12]
Shao H, Sun W. Comparative analysis of postoperative complications between laparoscopic and open radical gastrectomy for elderly with gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 2013, 33(4):321-324.
[13]
Cao HL, Jin SQ, Wang KB, et al.Prognostic factors influencing the survival of patients with carcinoma of the gastric cardia receiving preoperative interventional embolization chemotherapy[J].Oncotarget,2017,8(45):79567-79575.
[14]
Chen K, Pan Y, Zhai ST, et al.Totally laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A case-matched study about short-term outcomes[J].Medicine (Baltimore), 2017,96(38):e8061.
[15]
Parsons BN, Ijaz UZ, D'Amore R, et al.Comparison of the human gastric microbiota in hypochlorhydric states arising as a result of Helicobacter pylori-induced atrophic gastritis, autoimmune atrophic gastritis and proton pump inhibitor use[J].PLoS Pathog,2017,13(11):e1006653.
[16]
Awad HA, Hajeer MH, Abulihya MW, et al.Epidemiologic characteristics of gastric malignancies among Jordan University Hospital patients[J].Saudi Med J,2017,38(9):965-967.
[1] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[2] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[3] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[4] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[5] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[6] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[9] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[10] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[11] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[12] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[13] 刘见, 杨晓波, 何均健, 等. 应用电钩三孔法腹腔镜袖状胃切除术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 363-364.
[14] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
[15] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?