切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 110 -114. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.02.008

所属专题: 机器人手术 文献

论著

全机器人与机器人辅助行远端胃癌根治术近期疗效对照研究
熊强强1, 刘东宁1, 唐城1, 曹传林1, 李太原1,()   
  1. 1. 330000 南昌,南昌大学第一附属医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-28 出版日期:2018-02-26
  • 通信作者: 李太原

Comparative study of short-term clinical outcome between Total Da Vinci robotic distal Gastrectomy and Da Vinci robotic-Assisted distal Gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Qiangqiang Xiong1, Dongning Liu1, Cheng Tang1, Chuanlin Cao1, Taiyuan Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi 330006, China
  • Received:2017-06-28 Published:2018-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Taiyuan Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Taiyuan, Email:
引用本文:

熊强强, 刘东宁, 唐城, 曹传林, 李太原. 全机器人与机器人辅助行远端胃癌根治术近期疗效对照研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 110-114.

Qiangqiang Xiong, Dongning Liu, Cheng Tang, Chuanlin Cao, Taiyuan Li. Comparative study of short-term clinical outcome between Total Da Vinci robotic distal Gastrectomy and Da Vinci robotic-Assisted distal Gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 110-114.

目的

对比全机器人手术与机器人辅助手术根治远端胃癌的近期疗效,评估全机器人远端胃大部切除术的安全性及可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2014年12月至2016年12月收治的行远端胃大部切除术的160例胃癌患者的临床资料,其中60例行全机器人远端胃大部切除术(TRDG组),100例行机器人辅助远端胃大部切除术(RADG组)。采用SPSS18.0软件进行统计分析,手术相关指标计量资料用(±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验,术后并发症采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

与RADG组相比,TRDG组手术时间、淋巴结清扫数目和术后并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但术中出血量,切口长度,术后通气时间以及住院时间均明显减小(P<0.05)。

结论

全机器人远端胃大部切除术安全可行,且与机器人辅助组相比,其对患者损伤更小,术后恢复更快,近期疗效显著。

Objective

To compare the short-term clinical outcome between total robotic distal gastrectomy (TRDG grop) and robot-assisted distal gastrectomy (RADG group) for distal gastric cancer, and to evaluate the safety and feasibility of total robotic surgery system.

Methods

From December 2014 to December 2016, clinical data of 60 cases in TRDG group and 100 cases in RADG group were analyzed retrospectively. Intraoperative indicators and postoperative outcome were compared between two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in terms of anastomosis time and harvested lymph nodes between TRDG grop and RADG grop. However there were significant differences in terms of blood loss, incision length, flatus time and hospital stay between TRDG grop and RADG grop (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with robot-assisted distal gastrectomy, total robotic distal gastrectomy surgery has advantages including less trauma, quicker postoperative recovery and satisfactory short-term outcome. Thus, it is feasible and safe for surgical treatment of distal gastric cancer.

表1 160例胃癌根治术不同术式两组患者一般资料比较(例)
图1 机器人手术置孔图[1A、1B 为trocar孔]
图3 术后腹部切口
表2 160例胃癌根治术不同术式两组患者术后恢复及手术相关指标的比较(±s)
[1]
余佩武,罗华星.达芬奇机器人在胃肠手术中的应用与发展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(1):1-4.
[2]
Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA,et al.Efficacy of the Da Vincisurgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Ann Surg, 2010,252(2):254-262.
[3]
杜晓辉,邢晓伟.单中心达芬奇机器人胃癌根治术140例临床分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(1):20-22.
[4]
余佩武. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术的原则与评价[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2009, 16(1):1-5.
[5]
Takiguchi S, Fujiwara Y, Yamasaki M,et al.Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy. A prospective randomized single-blind study[J]. World J Surg, 2013,37(10):2379-2386.
[6]
Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa Y, et al. Early experience of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by acompute-enhanced surgical system[J].Surg Endosc,2002,16(8):1187-1191.
[7]
Yoon HM, Kim YW, Lee JH,et al.Robot-assisted total gastrectomy is comparable with laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012,26(5):1377-1381.
[8]
Park YK, Yoon HM, Kim YW, et al. Laparoscopy-Assisted versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Results from a Randomized Phase II Multicenter Clinical Trial (COACT 1001)[J]. Annals of Surgery, 2018, 42(9):S98-S99.
[9]
黄昌明,林建贤. 腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术后消化道重建方式合理选择[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2012(8):616-618.
[10]
Kim YW, Reim D, Park JY, et al. Role of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in suprapancreatic nodal dissection for gastric cancer[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30(4):1547-1552.
[11]
Caruso S, Patriti A, Marrelli D, et al.Open vs robot-assisted laparoscopic gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2011,7(4):452-458.
[12]
Huang KH, Lan YT, Fang WL, et al.Initial experience of robotic gastrectomy and comparison with open and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2012,16(7):1303-1310.
[13]
D'Annibale A, Pende V, Pernazza G,et al.Full robotic gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: surgical technique and preliminary results[J].J Surg Res, 2011,166(2):e113-120.
[14]
Parisi A, Ricci F, Trastulli S,et al.Robotic Total Gastrectomy With Intracorporeal Robot-Sewn Anastomosis: A Novel Approach Adopting the Double-Loop Reconstruction Method[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015. 94(49):e1922.
[15]
Kim MG, Kim BS, Kim TH,et al.The effects of laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy on surgical outcomes in the treatment of gastric cance[J]. J Korean Surg Soc, 2011,80(4):245-250.
[16]
陈雷,王志刚,雷泽华,等. 全腔镜与开腹远端胃癌D2根治术的疗效及对免疫功能影响的比较研究[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2016, 25(4):558-564.
[17]
Park SS, Kim MC, Park MS,et al.Rapid adaptation of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer by experienced laparoscopic surgeons[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012,26(1):60-67.
[18]
Diana M, Marescaux J. Robotic surgery[J]. Br J Surg. 2015,102:15-28.
[19]
Liu XX, Jiang ZW, Chen P,et al.Full robot-assisted gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis produces satisfying outcomes[J].World J Gastroenterol,2013,19(38):6427-6437.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 安杰, 牛云峰, 刘伟. LINC00520 通过miR-519b-3p/HIF1A 轴促进胃癌的侵袭转移[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 430-436.
[3] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[4] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[5] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[6] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[7] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[8] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[13] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[14] 施一辉, 张平新, 朱勇, 杨德林. 机器人辅助前列腺根治术后切缘阳性的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 633-637.
[15] 刘见, 杨晓波, 何均健, 等. 应用电钩三孔法腹腔镜袖状胃切除术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 363-364.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?