切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 39 -42. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.01.013

所属专题: 文献

论著

完全腹腔镜直肠癌根治术(Dixon术式)治疗直肠癌的疗效研究
蔡锐文1,(), 梁伟成1, 黄冀华1, 梁华艳1, 黄开劲1   
  1. 1. 525200 广东高州市人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-25 出版日期:2018-02-26
  • 通信作者: 蔡锐文

The effect of total laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer (Dixon) in the treatment of rectal cancer

Ruiwen Cai1,(), Weicheng Liang1, Jihua Huang1, Huayan Liang1, Kaijin Huang1   

  1. 1. Department of gastrointestinal surgery, Gaozhou people’s Hospital, Guangdong, Gaozhou 525200, China
  • Received:2017-05-25 Published:2018-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Ruiwen Cai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cai Ruiwen, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Maoming science and technology project(project number: 20160331)
引用本文:

蔡锐文, 梁伟成, 黄冀华, 梁华艳, 黄开劲. 完全腹腔镜直肠癌根治术(Dixon术式)治疗直肠癌的疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 39-42.

Ruiwen Cai, Weicheng Liang, Jihua Huang, Huayan Liang, Kaijin Huang. The effect of total laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer (Dixon) in the treatment of rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(01): 39-42.

目的

探讨完全腹腔镜直肠癌根治术(Dixon术式)治疗直肠癌的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2011年9月至2013年9月接诊的96例直肠癌患者,按照手术方法不同,分为开腹组、腹腔镜组,各48例。腹腔镜组进行完全腹腔镜Dixon术,开腹组进行开腹Dixon术。采用SPSS 18.0软件处理,两组围术期情况、肿瘤根治情况用均数±标准差表示,比较采用独立t检验;两组并发症、3年生存率采用χ2检验,P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

腹腔镜组手术时间长于开腹组,术中出血量、切口长度、肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、术后住院时间均比开腹组少/短,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组结肠切除长度、直肠切除长度、距下切缘距离以及结肠旁、系膜间、血管根部淋巴结清扫个数比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);腹腔镜组并发症总发生率为8.3%,明显少于开腹组的31.3%(χ2=5.485, P<0.05);腹腔镜组1~3年生存率分别为91.7%、77.1%、64.6%,与开腹组的89.6%、72.9%、62.5%比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在直肠癌患者中应用完全腹腔镜Dixon术式效果显著,具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少的优点,且肿瘤根治情况、远期疗效开腹手术相似。

Objective

To study the effect of total laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer (Dixon) in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Methods

96 patients of rectal cancer treated in our hospital from September 2011 to September 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different surgical methods, they were divided into laparotomy group and laparoscopic group, 48 cases in each group. The laparoscopic group was treated with total laparoscopic radical resection, Using SPSS18.0 software, the perioperative data and operative data of the two groups were expressed by mean±standard deviation (±s) and compared with the t test; the complications and 3 year survival rate of the two groups were counted by χ2 test, P<0.05 indicated significant difference.

Results

The operation time in the laparoscopic group was longer than that of the laparotomy group, and the intraoperative blood loss, incision length, anal exhaust time, ambulation time, and postoperative hospital stay were less/shorter than that of the laparotomy group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the length of removed colon, the length of removed rectum, the distance from the incisal margin and the number of lymph node dissection of pericolonic, membrane and vascular root between two groups (P>0.05); the total incidence of complications in laparoscopic group was 8.3%, which was significantly less than 31.3% in the laparotomy group (χ2=5.485, P<0.05); the 1~3 years survival rate of laparoscopic group was 91.7%, 77.1% and 64.6%, compared with laparotomy group 89.6%, 72.9%, 62.5%, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Total laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer is well for rectal cancer, it have the advantages of less trauma, faster recovery and less complications, the curative effect of tumor is similar to that of open surgery.

表1 96例直肠癌患者不同术式两组围术期情况比较(±s)
表2 96例直肠癌患者不同术式两组肿瘤根治情况比较(±s)
表3 96例直肠癌患者不同术式两组术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 96例直肠癌患者不同术式两组术后生存率比较[例(%)]
[1]
王颢,傅传刚. 直肠癌术前准确分期价值及对治疗策略选择的影响[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2014,34(1):37-40.
[2]
邵红梅,冯瑞,朱红,等. 中国人群结直肠癌危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制,2014,22(2):174-177.
[3]
王自强,周总光.不断提高我国腹腔镜直肠癌根治规范化水平[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2015,9(3):157-160.
[4]
Liu LG, Yan XB, Shan ZZ, et al. Anorectal functional outcome following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer[J]. Mol Clin Oncol, 2017, 6(4):613-621.
[5]
康亮,汪建平.经肛直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术实践与策略[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016,10(2):101-105.
[6]
Evans C, Stevenson AR, Sileri P, et al. A Multicenter Collaboration to Assess the Safety of Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2015, 58(8):799-807.
[7]
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会医政医管局中华医学会肿瘤学分会.结直肠癌诊疗规范(2015年版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2015,35(11):1177-1191.
[8]
李道娟,李倩,贺宇彤. 结直肠癌流行病学趋势[J]. 肿瘤防治研究,2015,42(3):305-310.
[9]
Keranmu A, Zheng H, Wu Y, et al. Comparative study of single-center patients with thyroid metastases from colorectal cancer and previously reported cases in the literature[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2017, 15(1):88-89.
[10]
曹金鹏,彭翔,李国新,等. 新辅助治疗后腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的中短期疗效[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2014,23(4):442-446.
[11]
宋纯,张庆彤.腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治的规范化与要求[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2015,9(3):166-170.
[12]
李世拥.腹部无切口腹腔镜直肠癌经肛门切除吻合术的实践与发展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016,10(2):91-93.
[13]
Badrek-Al, Amoudi AH, Greenslade GL, et al.How to deal with complications after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: lessons learnt from a tertiary referral centre[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2013, 15(6):707-712.
[14]
文剑锋,林希,秦颖,等. 腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术与开腹直肠癌根治术近期临床疗效比较[J]. 医学综述,2015,21(3):538-540.
[15]
Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA,2015,314(13):1356-1363.
[16]
Lee JY, Kim HC, Huh JW, et al. Incidence and risk factors for rectal pain after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery[J]. J Int Med Res, 2017, 45(2):781-791.
[17]
何二松,姚清深,周腾贤. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的可行性、安全性及肿瘤根治性分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2014,19(7):518-523.
[18]
蔡锚,胡万乐,郑晨果,等. 腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术与Dixon术的疗效对比[J]. 浙江创伤外科,2015,20(06):1073-1076.
[19]
Osborne AJ, Lim J, Gash KJ, et al. Comparison of single-incision laparoscopic high anterior resection with standard laparoscopic high anterior resection[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2013, 15(3):329-333.
[20]
任克彦. 经腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术与开腹手术的近期疗效比较[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2013,22(3):374-376.
[1] 刘敏, 唐恩溢, 刘喆, 葛苏蒙, 刘梅, 孙国文. 计算机导航技术在口腔颌面部微小异物取出手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 375-379.
[2] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[5] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[6] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[7] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[8] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[9] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[10] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[11] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[12] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[13] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[14] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[15] 王灿, 樊昊, 张卫, 于冠宇. LARS 评分的研制回顾与应用现状[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要