切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04) : 377 -380. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.04.008

论著

不同入路腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术治疗效果对比
李晓鸥1, 杨鹤鸣1, 王国栋2, 林海冠1, 杨建武1,()   
  1. 1. 100101 北京,中国人民解放军战略支援部队特色医学中心普通外科
    2. 100101 北京,中国人民解放军战略支援部队特色医学中心消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-28 出版日期:2024-08-26
  • 通信作者: 杨建武

Comparison of curative effects of laparoscopic radical resection of left colon cancer by different approaches

Xiaoou Li1, Heming Yang1, Guodong Wang2, Haiguan Lin1, Jianwu Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Special Medical Center of the Strategic Support Force of the People’s Liberation Army of China, Beijing 100101, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, Special Medical Center of the Strategic Support Force of the People’s Liberation Army of China, Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2024-02-28 Published:2024-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Jianwu Yang
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Youth Science Foundation Project(8210115590)
引用本文:

李晓鸥, 杨鹤鸣, 王国栋, 林海冠, 杨建武. 不同入路腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术治疗效果对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 377-380.

Xiaoou Li, Heming Yang, Guodong Wang, Haiguan Lin, Jianwu Yang. Comparison of curative effects of laparoscopic radical resection of left colon cancer by different approaches[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 377-380.

目的

比较网膜囊入路与中间入路腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术的治疗效果。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年1月117例左半结肠癌患者临床资料,根据手术入路不同分为研究组(n=59例,采用网膜囊入路腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术)与对照组(n=58例,采用中间入路腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术)。数据采用SPSS 25.0软件进行统计学分析。临床指标等计量资料用()表示,采用独立样本t检验;并发症等计数资料用[例(%)]表示,采用χ2检验;使用Kaplan-Meier曲线分析患者的生存情况。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

研究组患者腹腔镜游离时间短于对照组(P<0.05);两组其他临床指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组患者进入胰腺后方间隙次数明显少于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者术中各种损伤的发生率和两组患者术前、手术结束即刻肠腔、腹腔癌细胞脱落率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者随访8~24个月,生存期比较差异无统计学意义(Log-Rank χ2=0.411,P=0.522)。

结论

网膜囊入路在腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术中可获得与中间入路相当的治疗效果,且能缩短腹腔镜游离时间、减少进入胰腺后方间隙次数。

Objective

To explore the application value and feasibility of expanding retrogastric space in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (LPG) for proximal gastric cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 117 patients with left semicolon carcinoma from January 2018 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into study group (n=59 cases, laparoscopic radical resection of left semicolon carcinoma through omental sac approach) and control group (n=58 cases, laparoscopic radical resection of left semicolon carcinoma through intermediate approach) according to different surgical approaches. SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Clinical indicators and other measurement data were represented by (), and independent sample t test was used; The statistical data of complications were expressed by [cases (%)] and χ2 test was used. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The laparoscopic free time of the study group was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistical significant difference in other clinical indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). The number of patients entering the posterior space of the pancreas in the study group was significantly less than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistical significant difference in the incidence of various injuries during operation and the shedding rate of cancer cells in intestinal cavity and abdominal cavity before and immediately after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no statistical significant difference in survival time between the two groups (Log-Rank χ2=0.411, P=0.522).

Conclusion

The retinal capsule approach can achieve the same therapeutic effect as the middle approach in laparoscopic radical resection of left colon cancer, and can shorten the laparoscopic free time and reduce the number of times of entering the posterior pancreatic space.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
表2 两组患者围手术期指标比较(
表3 两组患者术中操作情况比较[例(%)]
表4 两组患者肠腔、腹腔癌细胞脱落比较[例(%)]
图1 两组患者术后生存情况比较
[1]
田传鑫, 赵磊. 结直肠癌及结直肠癌肝转移流行病学特点[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2021, 28(13): 1033-1038.
[2]
郑民华, 马君俊, 赵轩. 完全腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的技术难点与对策[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(10): 1104-1106.
[3]
朱秋伟, 华卫俊, 傅跃, 等. 腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术中保留左结肠动脉及直肠上动脉对老年患者的效果分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(05): 82-84, 91.
[4]
Kim HJ, Park JW. Surgical outcomes of various surgical approaches for transverse colon cancer[J]. J Minim Invasive Surg, 2022, 25(1): 1-6.
[5]
王枭杰, 郑志芳, 池畔, 等. 左原始后腹膜的解剖观察及其在术中左结肠后间隙分离时的临床意义[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2021, 24(07): 619-625.
[6]
顾晋, 汪建平, 孙燕, 等. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2017年版)[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 3-23.
[7]
于北京, 宋瑞, 张静文. 腹腔镜结肠癌根治术对局部进展期结肠癌患者腹腔、肠腔癌细胞脱落及腹膜纤溶功能的对照研究[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2021, 44(08): 737-742.
[8]
Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technieal notes and outcome[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11(4): 354-364.
[9]
江雪峰, 梁志宏, 刘书强, 等. “翻页式”完全中线入路完整肠系膜切除术在右半结肠癌患者的价值分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 279-282.
[10]
宋志岗, 连彦军, 刘帅, 等. 不同手术入路的腹腔镜右半结肠癌CME术临床疗效对比[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 535-538.
[11]
孙大伟, 孙军席, 于晨, 等. 腹腔镜左半结肠切除术不同手术入路的效果分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2023, 28(04): 281-285.
[12]
Zeng S, Wu W, Zhang X, et al. The significance of anatomical variation of the inferior mesenteric artery and its branches for laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer:a review[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2022, 20(1): 290.
[13]
邱福春, 李敏, 魏雯鹏, 等. 腹腔镜结肠癌根治术与开腹结肠癌根治术治疗结肠癌临床效果比较[J]. 内蒙古医学院学报, 2021, 43(03): 255-258, 261.
[14]
罗思静, 王玉颖, 范占胜, 等. 网膜囊入路对比中间入路腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术的临床疗效:倾向性评分匹配分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2021, 24(10): 897-903.
[15]
Efetov S, Zubayraeva A, Kayaalp C, et al. Selective approach to arterial ligation in radical sigmoid colon cancer surgery with D3 lymph node dissection:A multicenter comparative study[J]. Turk J Surg, 2022, 38(4): 382-390.
[16]
Crippa J, Grass F, Achilli P, et al. Surgical Approach to Transverse Colon Cancer:Analysis of Current Practice and Oncological Outcomes Using the National Cancer Database[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2021, 64(3): 284-292.
[17]
Benlice C, Parvaiz A, Baca B, et al. Standardization of the Definition and Surgical Management of Splenic Flexure Carcinoma by an International Expert Consensus Using the Delphi Technique:Room for Improvement?[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2023, 66(6): 805-815.
[18]
Keane CR, O'Grady G, Bissett IP, et al. Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection Versus Open Resection of Rectal Cancer:A Secondary Analysis of the Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2022, 65(7): e698-e706.
[1] 朱楠, 沈锋. 腹腔镜半肝切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 367-367.
[2] 刘连新, 张树庚. 腹腔镜左半肝联合左尾状叶切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 368-368.
[3] 刘连新, 孟凡征. 不断提高腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 355-358.
[4] 戴朝六, 赵阳. 腹腔镜解剖性肝切除应该重视的几个问题[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 359-362.
[5] 陆朝阳, 金也, 孙备. 腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的发展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 363-366.
[6] 刘炯, 彭乐, 马伟, 江斌. 鞘外解剖肝蒂技术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌的疗效评估[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 373-376.
[7] 杨尹默, 陈依然, 田孝东. 努力提高腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的规范化水平[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 237-242.
[8] 张太平, 刘悦泽. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术要点与原则[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 243-245.
[9] 王槐志, 孙丕绛, 崔上. 腹腔镜下胰十二指肠切除术的难点与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 246-248.
[10] 孟宇, 李金超, 刘金来, 刘晨, 王振勇. 新辅助化疗后LPD钩突切除中先动脉后静脉原则的安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 251-254.
[11] 宫向良, 刘征, 丁梅. 基于膜解剖D2+CME根治术治疗胃癌的近中期随访研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 267-270.
[12] 金田力, 袁文正, 付涛. 单孔腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后尿管拔除时机探讨[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 271-274.
[13] 杜彦斌, 黄涛, 寇天阔, 石英. 双镜联合根治术与腹腔镜根治术在早期结肠癌患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-278.
[14] 张聃, 王毅, 冯文迪, 方兴中. 完整结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌对患者生存期的影响观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 279-282.
[15] 唐浩, 梁平, 程千里, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 基于数字化微创技术对复杂性肝胆管结石患者胆道、肝静脉、门静脉解剖与变异情况及应用效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 291-294.
阅读次数
全文


摘要