Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05): 443-446. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2026.05.009

• Original Article • Previous Articles    

Comparison of laparoscopic primary suturing for common bile duct stones and T-tube drainage

Faming Tao, Mudeng Ba, Yingjun Chen, Chaoyang Wu†()   

  1. Department of Emergency Trauma Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 830001, China
  • Received:2026-01-26 Online:2026-10-26 Published:2026-09-25
  • Contact: Chaoyang Wu
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2025D01C138)

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the therapeutic effects of primary suture and T-tube drainage in the treatment of common bile duct stones using laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and drainage (LCBDE).

Methods

The clinical data of 103 patients with common bile duct stones who underwent LCBDE from January 2023 to May 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the primary suture group (n=55, with primary suture) and the T-tube drainage group (n=48, with T-tube drainage) based on the suture method of the common bile duct during LCBDE. χ2 test or t test was used to compare the surgical indicators, liver function indicators, pain degree, stress response indicators, and complications between the two groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The suture time of the common bile duct, operation time, drainage tube removal time, and hospital stay in the primary suture group were significantly shorter than those in the T-tube drainage group (all P<0.001). On the 3rd day after surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in the total bilirubin (TBIL), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels between the two groups (P>0.05), but the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), cortisol (Cor), C-reactive protein (CRP), and visual analogue scale (VAS) score in the primary suture group were lower than those in the T-tube drainage group (all P<0.001); there was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups at 6 months after surgery (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with T-tube drainage, primary suture during LCBDE can shorten the operation time of patients with common bile duct stones, promote postoperative recovery, alleviate postoperative pain, and reduce stress response.

Key words: Choledocholithiasis, Laparoscopes, Common Bile Duct Exploration, Primary Suture, T-tube Drainage

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-63138570 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd