Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05): 547-550. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.05.021

• Original Article • Previous Articles    

A comparative study of laparoscopic TaTME and TME after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

Yang Li1,(), Feng Dong1, Lipeng Zeng1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Yangtze River Shipping General Hospital, Wuhan Hubei Province 430010, China
  • Received:2023-10-26 Online:2024-10-26 Published:2024-07-22
  • Contact: Yang Li

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic transanal mesenterectomy (TaTME) and total mesenterectomy (TME) after neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 72 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who received treatment from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into TaTME group and TME group by random number table method, with 36 patients in each group. All patients underwent laparoscopic surgery after receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) before surgery. The TaTME group underwent laparoscopic TaTME, and the TME group underwent laparoscopic TME. SPSS 22.0 software was used to analyze the data. Perioperative related indicators, fecal incontinence severity (Wexner) score, international prostatic symptoms (IPSS) score and other measurement data were expressed by (), and independent sample t test was used. The statistical data of postoperative complications were represented by [cases (%)] and χ2 test was used. Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test were used for survival analysis. P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

Compared with TME group, the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, first anal exhaust time and postoperative hospital stay in TaTME group were significantly reduced (P<0.05), while the integrity of TME specimens was significantly increased (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the number of lymph nodes dissection, length of distal resection margin, positive rate of CRM and postoperative complications between TaTME group and TME group (P>0.05). Wexner and IPSS scores in TaTME group were significantly lower than those in TME group (P<0.05), while IIEF-5 scores were significantly higher (P<0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in cumulative overall survival (88.9% vs. 83.3%) and cumulative disease-free survival (86.1% vs. 80.6%) between the TaTME group and the TME group (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with laparoscopic TME, laparoscopic TaTME after NAT in LARC patients has achieved better efficacy. On the premise of not affecting the postoperative survival of patients, it shorens the operation time, reduces intraoperative injury, accelerates postoperative recovery, improves the integrity of TME, and significantly improves the anal, prostate and sexual functions.

Key words: Rectal Neoplasms, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Laparoscopes, Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision, Total Mesorectal Excision

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd