Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04): 443-446. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2023.04.024

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical study of ISR with different distal incisal margin distances after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal

Xiong Li, Yongkuan Cao()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Chendu Sichuan Province 610083, China
  • Received:2023-06-13 Online:2023-08-26 Published:2023-07-28
  • Contact: Yongkuan Cao

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the effect of two prophylactic ileostomy methods in laparoscopic ISR for ultra-low rectal cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 52 patients with LARC from June 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy(nCRT)before receiving ISR and were divided into group A(distal margin distance <1 cm,n=24)and group B(distal margin distance ≥1 cm,n=28)according to the distance of distal margin. All data were processed by SPSS 22.0 software. Perioperative indicators and other measurement data were expressed by(

x¯
±s),and independent t test was performed for inter-group comparison. The statistical data of postoperative complications were represented by[cases(%)]and χ2 test was performed. Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test were used for survival analysis. P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

There were no significant differences in operation time,intraoperative blood loss,number of lymph node dissection,postoperative exhaust time and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05). There were no significant differences in incision infection,anastomotic leakage,anastomotic hemorrhage,pelvic infection,intestinal obstruction and total complications between the two groups(P>0.05). The median follow-up time was 30 months(11~47 months). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that cumulative overall survival(70.8%vs.78.6%)and disease-free survival(62.5%vs.75.0%)were not significantly different between the two groups(Log-Rank χ2=0.256,1.360,P=0.613,0.244).

Conclusion

Patients with LARC with a distance of ≥1 cm and a distance of <1 cm at the distal incisional margin during ISR can achieve the same efficacy after nCRT,and the overall survival and disease-free survival of patients are not significantly affected.

Key words: Rectal Neoplasms, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Intersphincteric Resection, Distal Resection Margin, Treatment Outcome

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd