Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02): 196-199. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.02.027

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of laparoscopic-choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving lithotripsy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy on complications and short-term living quality in gallstone patients

Shaoyuan Wang1,(), Chunshan Li1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Guangyuan First People’s Hospital in Sichuan Province, Guangyuan Sichuan, 628017, China
  • Received:2018-01-23 Online:2019-04-26 Published:2019-04-26
  • Contact: Shaoyuan Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Shaoyuan,

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the effect of laparoscopic-choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving lithotripsy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy on complications and short-term living quality in gallstone patients.

Methods

116 gallstone patients in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2018 were selected, and they were divided into two groups by randomized double-blinded method. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in the laparoscopic group (n=58); and laparoscopic-choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving lithotripsy was performed in the laparoscopic-choledochoscopic group (n=58). SPSS 21.0 software package was used to analyze the data of the whole group. The first-stage success rate of calculus removed and complications in the two groups were described with frequency and rate, and compared with χ2 test; The surgical data, inflammatory factors and FACT-G score were recorded by (±s), and compared with independent t test, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The intraoperative bleeding volume, anal exhaust time, postoperative 24 h numerical rating scale (NRS), hospital stays in laparoscopic-choledochoscopic group were lower than those in laparoscopic group (P<0.05); The IL-6 and CRP levels of the two groups at postoperative 3 d were increased, but the levels of laparoscopic-choledochoscopic group were lower than those of laparoscopic group (P<0.05); The first-stage success rate of calculus removed of laparoscopic-choledochoscopic group (94.8%) was higher than laparoscopic group (79.3%), and the incidence of complications (8.6%) was lower than laparoscopic group (22.4%) (P<0.05); After surgery for 3 months, the FACT-G scores of the two groups were increased compared with those before surgery, and the scores of laparoscopic-choledochoscopic group [(87.1±8.8) points] was higher than laparoscopic group [(67.3±9.5) points], and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic-choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving lithotripsy in treatment of gallstone has advantages such as less bleeding volume, high first-stage success rate of calculus removed and slight pain, it can decrease postoperative inflammatory response, reduce complications and increase short-term living quality.

Key words: Cholecystolithiasis, Laparoscopy, Intraoperative complications, Quality of life, Inflammation

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd