切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 343 -346. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2026.04.011

论著

腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形保肛术技术难度的影响因素分析
杨进宝, 李伟, 张冰, 陈健, 王吉哲, 王玉佳, 王顺, 蒋志斌, 周烨, 杨建玲()   
  1. 050000 石家庄,联勤保障部队第九八〇医院普通外科二病区
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-20 出版日期:2026-08-26
  • 通信作者: 杨建玲

Analysis of influencing factors for technical difficulty of laparoscopic conformal sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer

Jinbao Yang, Wei Li, Bing Zhang, Jian Chen, Jizhe Wang, Yujia Wang, Shun Wang, Zhibin Jiang, Ye Zhou, Jianling Yang()   

  1. Department of General Surgery II Ward, Joint Logistics Support Force 980th Hospital, Shi Jiazhuang Hebei Province 05000, China
  • Received:2025-10-20 Published:2026-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Jianling Yang
  • Supported by:
    Medical Science Research Project Plan of the Health Commission of Hebei Province(20250190)
引用本文:

杨进宝, 李伟, 张冰, 陈健, 王吉哲, 王玉佳, 王顺, 蒋志斌, 周烨, 杨建玲. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形保肛术技术难度的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 343-346.

Jinbao Yang, Wei Li, Bing Zhang, Jian Chen, Jizhe Wang, Yujia Wang, Shun Wang, Zhibin Jiang, Ye Zhou, Jianling Yang. Analysis of influencing factors for technical difficulty of laparoscopic conformal sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(04): 343-346.

目的

探讨腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形保肛术(CSPO)的技术难度影响因素。

方法

回顾性队列研究,选取2022年1月至2025年6月行腹腔镜CSPO的低位直肠癌患者62例。收集患者临床资料和术中参数,以手术时间、术中出血量作为技术难度量化指标,通过单因素分析及多因素线性回归模型筛选影响因素。用SPSS 26.0软件进行数据分析,符合正态分布的计量资料以(均数±标准差)表示,非正态分布的计量资料以[中位数(四分位数间距)]表示,计数资料以[例(%)]表示。组间比较采用独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验以及χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

患者手术时间为100~280 min,中位时间185 min;术中失血量为20~350 ml,中位失血量85 ml。手术时间衡量手术难度时:肿瘤距肛缘距离、cTNM分期、新辅助放化疗史、骨盆狭窄指数均与手术时间相关(均P<0.05);多因素线性回归显示,肿瘤距肛缘距离、骨盆狭窄指数与cTNM分期均与手术时间密切相关(均P<0.05)。术中出血量衡量手术难度时:BMI、肿瘤距肛缘距离、cTNM分期、骨盆狭窄指数均与术中出血量相关(均P<0.05);多因素线性回归显示,肿瘤距肛缘距离、骨盆狭窄指数与cTNM分期均与术中出血量密切相关。

结论

腹腔镜CSPO技术难度受解剖及病理因素共同影响。肿瘤距肛缘距离、骨盆狭窄指数及cTNM分期与手术时间及术中出血量密切相关,可作为评估手术难度的核心指标。

Objective

To explore the influencing factors of technical difficulty in laparoscopic conformal sphincter-preserving operation (CSPO) for low rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. A total of 62 patients with low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic CSPO between January 2022 and June 2025 were enrolled. Clinical data and intraoperative parameters of all patients were collected. Operative duration and intraoperative blood loss were adopted as quantitative indicators of technical difficulty. Univariate analysis and multivariate linear regression models were used to screen independent influencing factors. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 software. Measurement data conforming to normal distribution were expressed as mean (

±s) standard deviation; non-normally distributed measurement data were presented as median (interquartile range); enumeration data were described as [cases (%)]. Intergroup comparisons were carried out by independent samples t test, Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The operative duration of all patients ranged from 100 to 280 minutes, with a median of 185 minutes; intraoperative blood loss varied from 20 to 350 ml, with a median of 85 ml. When operative duration was used to reflect surgical difficulty: tumor distance from the anal verge, clinical TNM (cTNM) stage, history of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and pelvic stenosis index were all correlated with operative duration (all P<0.05). Multivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that tumor distance from the anal verge, pelvic stenosis index and cTNM stage were closely associated with operative duration (all P<0.05). When intraoperative blood loss was used to evaluate surgical difficulty: body mass index (BMI), tumor distance from the anal verge, cTNM stage and pelvic stenosis index were all correlated with intraoperative blood loss (all P<0.05). Multivariate linear regression further verified that tumor distance from the anal verge, pelvic stenosis index and cTNM stage were independent factors closely related to intraoperative blood loss.

Conclusion

The technical difficulty of laparoscopic CSPO is jointly affected by anatomical and pathological factors. Tumor distance from the anal verge, pelvic stenosis index and cTNM stage are strongly correlated with operative duration and intraoperative blood loss, and can serve as core indicators for the preoperative assessment of surgical difficulty.

表1 腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形切除保肛术观察指标与手术时间的单因素分析
表2 腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形切除保肛术观察指标与手术时间的多因素分析(后退法)
表3 腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形切除保肛术观察指标与术中出血量的单因素分析
表4 腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形切除保肛术观察指标与术中出血量的多因素分析(后退法)
[1]
赵娜,郑海平. 多学科协作延续性合理用药规范对直肠癌造口预后分析[J]. 世界临床药物202243(4):488.
[2]
彭健宏,王炜锋,王若蔚,等. 低位局部进展期直肠癌多学科保肛治疗进展[J]. 消化肿瘤杂志(电子版)202517(2):168-181.
[3]
彭昕和,朱骥. 低位直肠癌患者不同保肛策略治疗后生活质量调查[J]. 现代肿瘤医学202533(6):938-945.
[4]
彭昕和,朱骥. 低位直肠癌手术与非手术保肛策略局限性探讨[J]. 实用肿瘤杂志202439(5):470-477.
[5]
杨方武,姬文超,杨峰. 适形切除保肛术与经括约肌间直肠切除术治疗低位直肠癌患者的临床效果对比[J]. 中国医学创新202421(8):16-20.
[6]
杨方武,姬文超,杨峰. 适形切除保肛术与经括约肌间直肠切除术治疗低位直肠癌患者的临床效果对比[J]. 中国医学创新202421(8):16-20.
[7]
Tchelebi LTEng CMessick CA,et al. Current treatment and future directions in the management of anal cancer[J]. CA Cancer J Clin202272(2):183-195.
[8]
Lv JGuan XWei R,et al. Development of artificial blood loss and duration of excision score to evaluate surgical difficulty of total laparoscopic anterior resection in rectal cancer[J]. Front Oncol202313:1067414.
[9]
Takagi KYamada MFuji T,et al. Impact of visceral fat area on surgical difficulty during robotic distal pancreatectomy(TAKUMI-2)[J]. Surg Endosc202539(5):3137-3145.
[10]
Han MGuo SMa S,et al. Predictive model of the surgical difficulty of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicenter,retrospective study[J]. J Robot Surg202419(1):19.
[11]
潘宏锋,黄颖. 经括约肌间切除术围手术期肛门功能保护的关键点[J]. 腹部外科202538(2): 99-104+117.
[12]
孔庆元,贺德,许毓敏,等. 全直肠系膜切除术联合经括约肌间切除术对超低位直肠癌患者Williams分级及肛门功能的影响[J]. 黑龙江医学202145(1): 36-38.
[13]
王一飞,武雪亮,安永铸,等. 新辅助化疗联合甘露醇灌肠对局部晚期直肠癌R0切除率影响[J/OL]. 世界临床药物,1-4[2025-08-15].
[14]
温广明,王荣昌,黄炯强,等. 比较CSPO和ISR治疗超低位直肠癌的保肛效果[J]. 现代生物医学进展202323(3):475-478+574.
[15]
俞燕,金鸥霞,章新花. 不同术式治疗低位直肠癌的疗效及安全性研究[J]. 浙江创伤外科202126(6):1123-1125.
[16]
卫洪波,方佳峰. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌手术精准筋膜解剖的原则与意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202216(1):13-17.
[17]
徐静,蔡小凤,陈萍萍,等. 盆底肌训练在直肠癌患者保肛术后低位前切除综合征中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理202424(1): 134-138.
[18]
Kaur HGabriel HAwiwi MO,et al. Anatomic Basis of Rectal Cancer Staging: Clarifying Controversies and Misconceptions[J]. Radiographics202444(7):e230203.
[19]
白明瀚,孙凌宇,郑宏群,等. 基于膜解剖理论的全直肠系膜切除层面显露与筋膜辨识[J]. 中国实用外科杂志202343(10):1188-1195+1200.
[20]
郑民华,马君俊,赵轩. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术式选择原则与规范化[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202216(1):5-8.
[21]
蒲文吉,金晶. 低位直肠癌器官保留研究进展[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志202330(16):1005-1012.
[1] 彭兵. 联合血管切除重建的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术实践与探索[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(1): 23-23.
[2] 李牧言, 张树庚, 刘连新. 腹腔镜全尾状叶切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 323-323.
[3] 马禧圆, 母德安, 曾少杰, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创腹腔镜IV段肝肿瘤切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 325-325.
[4] 尚培中, 张克俭, 聂阿娜, 张克勤, 刘冰, 李晓武. 胆总管活动度的临床意义及其在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 319-322.
[5] 严雨楼, 洪晟乾, 苏显, 王硕, 祁付珍, 徐建波. 不同手术操作腹腔镜左半肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 326-330.
[6] 张锰钢, 刘悦泽, 张太平. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的关键技术和质量控制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 210-214.
[7] 杨永君, 王槐志. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术主要并发症及处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 215-218.
[8] 付丽坤, 崔红梅, 高福来, 乔红, 冯钟煦. 腹腔镜下胆总管探查“T”管引流术与经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗继发性胆总管结石的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 226-230.
[9] 赵方, 陈廷昊, 陈泳松, 王健宇, 刘希. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术在高龄患者中的安全性及有效性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 231-234.
[10] 王学军, 唐水斌, 艾武. LCBDE与ERCP+EST分别联合LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 235-238.
[11] 李伟, 张伟, 崔啸晨, 张涛涛, 王海超. 腹腔镜精准肝蒂解剖法切除术与常规切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 244-247.
[12] 梁前俊, 李昊, 张家龙, 邰胜, 梁朝朝. 国产精锋单孔机器人在中高危前列腺癌患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 413-419.
[13] 吕定阳, 王玘葳, 双卫兵. 机器人辅助后腹腔镜肾部分切除术的技巧体会[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 383-388.
[14] 谢启帆, 刘志烨, 叶楚津, 谢海标, 韦琨, 钟方千俞, 蒲小勇. 吲哚菁绿荧光引导机器人辅助改良顺行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 445-450.
[15] 朱瑶楠, 代俊安, 朱虹, 吴亦淇, 马庆华. 苏州市相城区居民寄生虫病健康素养水平及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 311-319.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?