切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 502 -505. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.05.009

论著

266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者预后分析
孙建娜1, 孔令军1,(), 任崇禧1, 穆坤1, 王晓蕊2   
  1. 1. 061001 河北 沧州,河北省沧州中西医结合医院
    2. 300060 天津,天津医科大学肿瘤医院
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-01 出版日期:2024-10-26
  • 通信作者: 孔令军

Prognostic analysis of 266 patients with stage IV breast cancer undergoing surgery for the first time

Jianna Sun1, Lingjun Kong1,(), Chongxi Ren1, Kun Mu1, Xiaorui Wang2   

  1. 1. Hebei Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Cangzhou Hebei Province 061001, China
    2. Tumor Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Received:2023-11-01 Published:2024-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Lingjun Kong
  • Supported by:
    Hebei Province 2020 Annual Medical Science Research Project Plan(20200212)
引用本文:

孙建娜, 孔令军, 任崇禧, 穆坤, 王晓蕊. 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者预后分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 502-505.

Jianna Sun, Lingjun Kong, Chongxi Ren, Kun Mu, Xiaorui Wang. Prognostic analysis of 266 patients with stage IV breast cancer undergoing surgery for the first time[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 502-505.

目的

探究首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者首诊及术后临床病理特征,转移和治疗情况,旨在探讨其对预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2007年2月至2017年12月两家医院收治的266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌原发灶手术患者的临床病例资料。随访起始时间为患者确诊时间,随访截止时间为患者死亡时间或2020年12月31日。纳入年龄、主诉时间、首诊临床T/N分期、转移情况、术后分子标志物表达、手术时机、术后切缘、脉管癌栓情况、术后病理T/N分期及治疗情况,研究手术患者的预后相关因素。应用Stata 15.0软件进行统计学分析,预后的单变量分析采用Log-Rank检验,预后的多变量分析采用Cox回归模型分析。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

预后单因素分析:临床N分期,首诊转移情况,术后ER、PR表达情况,术后 Ki-67 表达水平,术后切缘情况,术后病理 T、N分期和术后原发灶区域放疗与患者的OS相关(P 值均<0.05)。预后多因素分析:首诊转移情况,术后 Ki-67 表达水平,术后病理 T、N 分期和术后原发灶区域放疗均是影响患者 OS 的独立预后因素(P 值均<0.05)。

结论

患者术后病理 T、N 分期低,首诊寡转移状态稳定,术后 Ki-67≤20%,术后原发灶区域放疗生存更能获益。

Objective

To investigate the clinicopathological features, metastasis and treatment of patients undergoing first diagnosis and postoperative surgery for stage Ⅳ breast cancer, and to explore the influence on prognosis.

Methods

The clinical data of 266 patients with stage Ⅳ primary breast cancer undergoing surgery for the first time admitted to two hospitals from February 2007 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up started at the time of diagnosis and ended at the time of death or December 31, 2020. Age, chief complaint time, first clinical T/N stage, metastasis, postoperative molecular marker expression, operation time, postoperative resection margin, vascular cancer embolus, postoperative pathological T/N stage and treatment were included to study the prognostic factors of patients undergoing surgery. Stata 15.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Log-Rank test was used for univariate analysis of prognosis, and Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis of prognosis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Univariate analysis of prognosis: clinical N stage, first diagnosis metastasis, postoperative ER and PR expression, postoperative Ki-67 expression level, postoperative resection margin, postoperative pathological T and N stage and postoperative primary site radiotherapy were correlated with patients' OS (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis of prognosis: The first diagnosis of metastasis, the expression level of Ki-67 after surgery, the T and N stages of postoperative pathology, and the radiotherapy of the primary site were all independent prognostic factors affecting the patients' OS (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The postoperative pathological T and N stages of the patient were low, the oligometastases were stable at the first diagnosis, and the postoperative Ki-67 was less than 20%. The survival of the patient with radiotherapy in the primary site was more beneficial.

表1 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌原发灶手术患者生存预后的单因素分析
表2 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者总生存时间多因素分析
图1 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者首诊转移情况生存曲线
图2 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者术后Ki-67表达水平生存曲线
图3 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者术后病理T分期生存曲线
图4 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者术后病理N分期生存曲线
图5 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者术后区域放疗生存曲线
[1]
Gradishar WJAnderson BOAbraham J,et al. Breast Cancer,Version 3.2020,NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw2020,18(4):452-478.
[2]
Cardoso FSenkus ECosta A,et al. 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer(ABC 4)dagger[J]. Ann Oncol2018,29(8):1634-1657.
[3]
Soran A. Are we close to the end of the primary tumor resection discussion for de novo stage IV BC?[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol2019,45(2):81-82.
[4]
王嘉,郭宝良,王杉,等.初诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌诊疗临床实践指南解读[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2023,17(03):250-254.
[5]
Giuliano A EEdge S BHortobagyi G N. Eighth Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Breast Cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol2018,25(7):1783-1785.
[6]
Yoshioka S,Hojo S,Wakabayashi Y.A Case of Stage Ⅳ Breast Cancer Invaded Chest Wall Successfully Resected with Local and Systemic Therapy[J].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho2022,49(13):1932-1934.
[7]
Si YYuan PHu N,et al. Primary Tumor Surgery for Patients with De Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer can Decrease Local Symptoms and Improve Quality of Life[J]. Ann Surg Oncol2020,27(4):1025-1033.
[8]
Slamon D JNeven PChia S,et al. Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer[J]. N Engl J Med2020,382(6):514-524.
[9]
Lyu X,Luo B.Prognostic factors and survival prediction in HER2-positive breast cancer with bone metastases:A retrospective cohort study[J].Cancer Med2021,10(22):8114-8126.
[10]
Wuerstlein RBarrios CLambertini M,et al. Highlights from ABC5: Bridging the Gap[J]. Breast Care(Basel)2020,15(1):75-81.
[11]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.乳腺癌全身治疗指南(2021年版)[J].浙江实用医学2021,26(06):520-535.
[12]
Fisher B,Bryant J,Wolmark N,et al.Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2023,41(10):1795-1808.
[13]
Finkelman BS,Zhang H,Hicks DG,et al.The Evolution of Ki-67 and Breast Carcinoma: Past Observations,Present Directions,and Future Considerations[J].Cancers(Basel),2023,15(3):doi:10.3390/cancers15030808.
[14]
陈珊,胡智强,张月明,等.Orai1、Orai3在乳腺癌组织中的表达及与病理学指标的相关性分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2023,17(05):514-517.
[15]
Wajid S,Samad FA,Syed AS,et al.Ki-67 and Its Relation With Complete Pathological Response in P atients With Breast Cancer[J]. Cureus,2021,13(7):e16788.
[16]
Zhao YY,Sun HF,Yang XL,et al.Local Surgery Improves Survival in Patients with Primary Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study[J]. Breast Care(Basel),2020,15(4):392-399.
[17]
Lian CL,Guo LY,Zhang L,et al.Aggressive Local Treatment Improves Survival in Stage IV Breast Cancer With Synchronous Metastasis[J].Front Oncol,2020,10:522580.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[4] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[8] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[9] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[10] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[11] 丁富贵, 吴泽涛, 董卫国. 家族性腺瘤性息肉病临床特征及生物信息学分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 512-518.
[12] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?