切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 392 -395. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.04.011

论著

86例肝门部胆管癌的解剖学观察及三维重建联合ICG分子荧光成像技术的应用价值
唐卫东1,(), 邓杰文1, 姜超1, 杨秀林1, 陈霞1   
  1. 1. 621000 四川绵阳,四川省科学城医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-23 出版日期:2021-08-17
  • 通信作者: 唐卫东

Anatomical observation and three-dimensional reconstruction combined with ICG imaging in 86 cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Weidong Tang1,(), Jiewen Deng1, Chao Jiang1, Xiulin Yang1, Xia Chen1   

  1. 1. Sichuan Science City Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan 621000, China
  • Received:2020-07-23 Published:2021-08-17
  • Corresponding author: Weidong Tang
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation(81672882); Scientific Research Project of Sichuan Medical Association(S17003)
引用本文:

唐卫东, 邓杰文, 姜超, 杨秀林, 陈霞. 86例肝门部胆管癌的解剖学观察及三维重建联合ICG分子荧光成像技术的应用价值[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 392-395.

Weidong Tang, Jiewen Deng, Chao Jiang, Xiulin Yang, Xia Chen. Anatomical observation and three-dimensional reconstruction combined with ICG imaging in 86 cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(04): 392-395.

目的

研究三维重建技术对肝门部胆管癌(HCCA)术前解剖学分型的准确性,及三维重建联合吲哚菁绿(ICG)分子荧光成像技术的临床应用价值。

方法

选取2017年3月至2020年3月行手术治疗的86例HCCA患者为研究对象,随机分为联合组和常规组各43例。联合组在三维重建模型下+ICG分子荧光成像技术指导手术方案,常规组采用传统影像学指导手术方案。采用SPSS20.0软件对数据进行处理,围术期指标等计量资料以(±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验;生存分析采用K-M法;P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

联合组肿瘤分型诊断的准确性显著高于常规组(100% vs. 72.1%),P<0.05;联合组侦测预切除肝脏区域方案与实际手术方式比较一致率显著高于常规组(95.3% vs. 79.1%),P<0.05;两组患者均未发生围术期死亡,联合组手术时间、肝门Pringle阻断时间及术中出血量优于常规组(P<0.05);联合组术后并发症总发生率明显低于常规组(13.9% vs. 37.2%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后进行3~51个月随访,K-M曲线分析显示两组术后无病生存及累积总生存率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

三维重建联合ICG分子荧光成像技术可对HCCA进行术前准确评估,且可缩短手术时间,减少术中出血,降低术后并发症发生率,可在临床推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the accuracy of 3D reconstruction technique in preoperative anatomical classification of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA), and to explore the clinical application value of three-dimensional reconstruction combined with ICG imaging.

Methods

A total of 86 HCCA patients underwent surgical treatment from March 2017 to March 2020 were selected as the study subjects and were randomly divided into the combined group(43 cases) and the conventional group(43 cases), .The combined group was guided with the ICG imaging under the three-dimensional reconstruction model, while the conventional group was guided with the conventional imaging technique. Spss20.0 software were used to process the data. The perioperative indicators and other measurement data were expressed as (±s), and the comparison were analyzed by using independent t test; the postoperative complications and other count data were analyzed by using χ2 test; K-M method were used for survival analysis; A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The accuracy of tumor typing diagnosis in the combined group was significantly higher than that in the conventional group (100% vs. 72.1%) P<0.05; The consistency rate of the combined group’s detection of pre-resection of the liver area compare with the actual surgical method was significantly higher than that in the conventional group (95.3% vs. 79.1%) P<0.05; There was no perioperative death both in the two groups. The operative time, hepatic Pringle block time and intraoperative bleeding in the combined group were better than those in the conventional group (P<0.05); The total incidence of postoperative complications in the combined group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (13.9% vs. 37.2%) with significant differences (P<0.05). Follow-up of 3 to 51 months after operation, K-M curve analysis showed that there was no significant difference in terms of disease-free survival and cumulative overall survival rate between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Three-dimensional reconstruction combined with ICG imaging could accurately evaluate HCCA before surgery, shorten the operative time, reduce intraoperative bleeding and could reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, which could be widely applied in clinical practice.

表1 86例HCCA患者不同术前评估方案两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 86例HCCA患者两组不同术前规划方案及实际手术方式符合率比较(例)
表3 86例HCCA患者不同术前评估方案两组患者围术期相关指标比较(±s)
表4 86例HCCA患者不同术前评估方案两组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
图1 86例HCCA患者不同术前评估方案K-M生存曲线分析无复发生存及累积生存率情况
[1]
谭福勇,王鹏,李尧,等. 联合肝切除术结合肝动脉重建治疗10例肝门部胆管癌临床分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2020,14(3):248-251.
[2]
刘俊鹏,苏洋. 肝门部胆管癌的诊断与外科治疗进展[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2020,29(11):1313-1316.
[3]
王程,黄强,杨骥. 三维可视化技术在肝脏恶性肿瘤手术中应用价值Meta分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2020,29(1):19-26.
[4]
方驰华,王晓颍,刘允怡. 计算机辅助联合吲哚菁绿分子荧光影像技术在肝脏肿瘤诊断和手术导航中应用指南(2019版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2019,39(7):641-650,654.
[5]
张玮琪,卓嘉明,方驰华. ICG分子荧光影像技术用于肝脏肿瘤手术安全性和有效性Meta分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2019,39(7):729-734.
[6]
Zhang J, Allardyce BJ, Rajkhowa R, et al. Silk particles, microfibres and nanofibres: A comparative study of their functions in 3D printing hydrogel scaffolds[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019, 103: 109784.
[7]
腹腔镜肝门部胆管癌根治切除术操作规范专家组,中华外科杂志编辑部. 腹腔镜肝门部胆管癌根治性切除操作流程专家建议[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志,2019,35(11):2441-2446.
[8]
Cai Z, Yin Y, Cai Z, et al. Efficacy of liver transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine, 2018, 97(30): e11626.
[9]
Birgin E, Rasbach E, Reissfelder C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of caudate lobectomy for treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 46(5): 747-753.
[10]
李炜,王敬晗,姜小清. 肝门部胆管癌外科治疗争议与进展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2020,40(4):472-476.
[11]
周雨,简志祥. 吲哚菁绿荧光影像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志,2019,25(3):225-228.
[12]
王坚. 三维可视化技术在肝门胆管癌术前评估中的作用[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志,2019,31(10):577-579.
[13]
曾思略,曾宁,祝文,等. 三维可视化联合吲哚菁绿荧光影像技术在原发性肝癌诊治中的价值[J]. 南方医科大学学报,2019,39(12):1402-1408.
[14]
方驰华,刘允怡,曾宁,等. 肝门部胆管癌三维可视化精准诊治中国专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2020,40(3):260-266.
[15]
曾宁,曾思略,杨剑,等. 增强现实导航技术联合吲哚菁绿分子荧光影像在肝门部胆管癌根治术中应用研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2020,40(12):1413-1418.
[1] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[2] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[3] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[4] 高建松, 陈晓晓, 冯婷, 包剑锋, 魏淑芳, 潘林. 基于超声瞬时弹性成像的多参数决策树模型评估慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化等级[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 923-929.
[5] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[6] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[7] 张莲莲, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳. 颈部血管超声在粥样硬化斑块易损性评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 816-821.
[8] 刘丹妮, 敖梦, 冉海涛, 李世玉, 秦芳. 三维超声心动图及二维斑点追踪成像对持续性心房颤动复律后双心房逆向重构的评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 827-835.
[9] 李全喜, 唐辉军, 张健生, 杨飞. 基于MUSE-DWI与SS-DWI技术在前列腺癌图像中的对比研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 553-557.
[10] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[11] 杨天池, 韩威, 邱枫, 祁佳慧. 术中胰腺超声弹性成像在胰腺质地评估中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 646-650.
[12] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[13] 邱春华, 张志宏. 1108例小肠疾病的临床诊断及检查策略分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 948-954.
[14] 赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红. 超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 988-994.
[15] 耿磊, 张照婷, 许磊, 黄海, 孙毅, 杨伏猛, 徐凯, 胡春峰. 帕金森病前驱期基底神经节环路磁共振弥散张量成像的应用研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 995-1003.
阅读次数
全文


摘要