切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 298 -301. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.03.018

所属专题: 文献

论著

氩氦刀冷冻消融联合TACE治疗巨大肝癌对免疫功能的影响
罗剑1,(), 盛文飞1, 马佳铭1, 李俊2   
  1. 1. 237005 安徽医科大学附属六安医院
    2. 230022 安徽医科大学第一附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-07 出版日期:2021-06-26
  • 通信作者: 罗剑

The effect on immune function of patients with huge liver cancer by argon-helium knife cryoablation combined with TACE

Jian Luo1,(), Wenfei Sheng1, Jiaming Ma1, Jun Li2   

  1. 1. Lu’an Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University 237005
    2. First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University 230022
  • Received:2020-07-07 Published:2021-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Jian Luo
  • Supported by:
    Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation(1908085MF158); Anhui Provincial Key Research and Development Plan Project(1806H1803203); Key R&D Project of Lu ’an Science and Technology Bureau(bzzc2019069)
引用本文:

罗剑, 盛文飞, 马佳铭, 李俊. 氩氦刀冷冻消融联合TACE治疗巨大肝癌对免疫功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 298-301.

Jian Luo, Wenfei Sheng, Jiaming Ma, Jun Li. The effect on immune function of patients with huge liver cancer by argon-helium knife cryoablation combined with TACE[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 298-301.

目的

探讨氩氦刀冷冻消融联合经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗巨大肝癌临床效果以及对患者免疫功能的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2016年11月至2020年5月92例巨大肝癌患者资料,根据治疗方法不同分为联合组和TACE组,TACE组(n=48)采用单纯TACE治疗,联合组(n=44)采用TACE联合氩氦刀冷冻消融治疗。用SPSS 22.00统计软件进行数据分析,免疫功能等计量资料用(±s)表示,采用独立t检验,疗效比较采用秩和检验;并发症比较采用χ2检验,总生存率采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

联合组总有效率显著高于TACE组(P<0.05);治疗后1个月,联合组免疫功能指标均优于TACE组(P<0.05);联合组并发症总发生率为36.4%(16/44),TACE组39.6%(19/48),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);联合组1、2、3年的生存率分别为81.8%、56.8%、36.4%明显高于TACE组总生存率60.4%、35.4%、14.6%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

氩氦刀冷冻消融联合TACE治疗巨大肝癌安全有效,相比于单纯TACE治疗,可有效改善患者的免疫功能,提高患者的生存率,值得临床推广。

Objective

To investigate the clinical outcome of argon-helium cryoablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to evaluate its effect on the immune function of patients.

Methods

From November 2016 to May 2020, a retrospective analysis was performed in 92 patients with huge liver cancer. According to the treatment methods, 48 cases were divided into the TACE group who were treated with TACE alone, and 44 cases were divided into combined group who were treated with TACE combined with argon-helium knife cryoablation. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 22.00 software. Measurement data such as immune function were expressed as (±s), and were examined by the independent t test, while curative effect were compared by using rank and inspection. The complications were compared by using χ2 test, and the overall survival rate was analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier method. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The total effective rate of the combined group was significantly higher than that of the TACE group (P<0.05). One month after treatment, the immune function indexes of the combined group were better than those of the TACE group respectively (P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the combined group was 36.4% (16/44) and 39.6% (19/48) in the TACE group, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The 1, 2, and 3 year survival rates were 81.8%, 56.8%, and 36.4% in the combined group respectively. and the 1, 2, and 3 year survival rates were 60.4%, 35.4%, and 14.6% in the TACE group respectively, with statistically significant difference between two groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Argon-helium cryoablation combined with TACE is safe and effective in the treatment of huge liver cancer. Compared with TACE alone, it could effectively improve the immune function of patients and improve the survival rate of patients, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 92例巨大肝癌不同疗法两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 92例巨大肝癌不同疗法两组患者治疗后疗效比较(例)
表3 92例巨大肝癌不同疗法两组患者治疗前后免疫功能比较[ (±s),%]
表4 92例巨大肝癌不同疗法两组患者治疗后并发症比较(例)
图1 92例巨大肝癌不同疗法两组患者总生存率比较
[1]
胡泽明,陈彪,钟佳宁,等.原发性肝癌治疗方法的应用进展[J]. 山东医药,2019,59(9): 106-110.
[2]
钟坤雨,鞠蔚华,刘江伟,等. 巨大肝癌的外科治疗方法[J/CD]. 中国肝脏病杂志(电子版),2019,11(1): 1-5.
[3]
郭永坤. TACE联合肿瘤肝外侧支循环栓塞术治疗原发性肝癌疗效评价[J]. 临床研究,2019,27(2): 1-2.
[4]
李泳群,韩志海. 氩氦冷冻手术的免疫效应[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2018,46(10): 1140-1142.
[5]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I,et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries[J]. CA CANCER J CLIN,2018,68(6): 394-424.
[6]
王宁,刘硕,杨雷,等. 2018全球癌症统计报告解读[J/CD]. 肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志,2019,5(1): 87-97.
[7]
Yu W-B, Rao A, Vu V,et al. Management of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma:Update 2016[J]. World J Hepatol,2017,9(13): 627-634.
[8]
李照,朱继业. 《原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2017年版)》解读[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志,2017,33(9): 1655-1657.
[9]
Massani M, Stecca T, Ruffolo C,et al. Should we routinely use DEBTACE for unresectable HCC? cTACE versus DEBTACE: a single-center survival analysis[J]. Updates Surg,2017,69(1): 67-73.
[10]
Guo N, Miao Y, Sun M. Transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization plus cinobufotalin injection adjuvant therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 27 trials involving 2,079 patients[J]. Onco Targets Ther,2018,11: 8835-8853.
[11]
Katsanos K, Kitrou P, Spiliopoulos S,et al. Comparative effectiveness of different transarterial embolization therapies alone or in combination with local ablative or adjuvant systemic treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Plos One,2017,12(9): e0184597.
[12]
黄浩峰,庞强. 经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞术后原发性肝细胞癌残留状态的增强CT与超声造影比较[J]. 世界华人消化杂志,2019,27(18): 1161-1166.
[13]
陈亚斌,李冉冉,郭文治. 氩氦刀冷冻治疗的抗肿瘤免疫学机制研究进展[J]. 免疫学杂志,2018,34(3): 259-264.
[14]
刘建军. 肝癌患者术后疼痛对细胞免疫功能及早期预后的影响[D]. 广州:南方医科大学,2017:1-66.
[15]
余辉,席玮,陈世晞,等. 肝动脉化疗栓塞序贯射频消融对原发性肝癌患者的细胞免疫功能影响[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2017,37(12): 1591-1593,1604.
[16]
李泳群,韩志海. 氩氦冷冻手术的免疫效应[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2018,46(10): 1140-1142.
[17]
宋平辉,周牛蕾.不同肝血流阻断方案对大肝癌手术治疗效果的影响[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2016,10(2): 168-170.
[1] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[2] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[3] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[4] 杜彦斌, 黄涛, 寇天阔, 石英. 双镜联合根治术与腹腔镜根治术在早期结肠癌患者中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-278.
[5] 刘春军, 严方方, 王宝锋, 常婷婷, 郭红红, 李志强. 替加环素联合人免疫球蛋白治疗XDRAB致VAP 的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 797-800.
[6] 尹炳驿, 张楚楚, 刘艺, 林洪生. 益气清金汤加味治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 462-465.
[7] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[8] 陆镜明, 韩大为, 任耀星, 黄天笑, 向俊西, 张谞丰, 吕毅, 王傅民. 基于术前影像组学的肝内胆管细胞癌淋巴结转移预测的系统性分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 852-858.
[9] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
[10] 林小勇, 张兰霞, 曾庆劲, 贺需旗, 谭雷, 郭光辉, 龙颖琳, 李凯, 吴宇轩. 负压抽吸活检针在肝困难病灶活检中的初步应用研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 694-698.
[11] 雷永琪, 刘新阳, 杨黎渝, 铁学宏, 俞星新, 耿志达, 刘雨, 陈政良, 惠鹏, 梁英健. 肝脏血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤合并贫血一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 710-718.
[12] 欧阳佳裕, 李刚, 贺露瑶, 罗娜. 双层探测器光谱CT在早期原发性肝癌中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 557-561.
[13] 王凯飞, 牟怡平, 李晓辉, 王瑞涛, 侯惠莲, 张月浪. 原发性肝平滑肌肉瘤临床病理特征及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 357-362.
[14] 陈志坚, 俞建达, 池小斌, 吕立志, 陈永标. 三维可视化技术在腹腔镜肝巨大肿瘤切除中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 302-307.
[15] 黄俊豪, 陈宗杰, 胡添松. 血小板相关参数对肝内胆管细胞癌根治性切除患者预后预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 308-312.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?