切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 558 -561. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.06.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

近端胃癌根治术中脾脏切除与脾脏保留的短期和长期效果
王领1, 于洁1, 段红亮1, 李德正1, 高永涛2,()   
  1. 1. 712000 陕西咸阳,陕西省核工业215医院普通外科
    2. 716000 陕西延安,延安大学附属医院 普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-19 出版日期:2020-12-26
  • 通信作者: 高永涛

The short-term and long-term effects of splenectomy and spleen preservation in radical gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer

Ling Wang1, Jie Yu1, Hongliang Duan1, Dezheng Li1, Yongtao Gao2,()   

  1. 1. General surgery Department of Shaanxi Nuclear Industry 215 Hospital Shaanxi Xianyang 712000
    2. General surgery Department, affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University, Shaanxi Yan'an 716000
  • Received:2019-11-19 Published:2020-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Yongtao Gao
  • About author:
    Correspondence author: Gao Yongtao, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Shaanxi Natural Science basic Research Project(2015JM7062)
引用本文:

王领, 于洁, 段红亮, 李德正, 高永涛. 近端胃癌根治术中脾脏切除与脾脏保留的短期和长期效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 558-561.

Ling Wang, Jie Yu, Hongliang Duan, Dezheng Li, Yongtao Gao. The short-term and long-term effects of splenectomy and spleen preservation in radical gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(06): 558-561.

目的

探讨近端胃癌根治术中脾脏切除与脾脏保留的短期及长期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年6月间行腹腔镜胃癌根治术患者43例资料,根据术式不同分为保脾组20例,切脾组23例。采用统计软件SPSS 24.0进行数据分析,围术期各项指标和NO.10及NO.11淋巴结清扫数目采用(±s)表示,独立样本t检验;术后并发症组间比较采用χ2检验;绘制两组1年、3年、5年总生存率及无病生存率Kaplan-Meier曲线图,采用Log-rank法检测;以P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者均成功完成手术,无中转开腹,无术后在院死亡病例,术后均完成随访。保脾组住院时间明显少于切脾组(P<0.05),手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、淋巴结清扫数目及NO.10及NO.11淋巴结清扫数目两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);保脾组并发症发生率(7例,35.0%)明显少于切脾组(15例,65.2%), P<0.05;保脾组患者1年、3年、5年总生存率分别为80.0%、45.0%、40.0%,切脾组为82.6%、47.8%、39.1%(P>0.05);保脾组患者1年、3年、5年无病生存率分别为75.0%、45.0%、35.0%,切脾组为78.3%、43.5%、34.8%,两组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

进展期近端胃癌根治术中脾脏切除与脾脏保留的效果比较,后者术后恢复更快,且并发症发生率较低,两者在淋巴结清扫的效果相同,远期预后相当。

Objective

To investigate the short-term and long-term efficacy of splenectomy and splenic preservation in radical resection of proximal gastric cancer.

Methods

the data of 43 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer from January 2012 to June 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different operation methods, the patients were divided into the spleen-preserving group (20 cases) and the spleen-cutting group (23 cases). Statistical software SPSS 24.0 was used for data analysis. Indicators and number of No.10 and No.11 lymph nodes dissected during the perioperative period were expressed as (±s), and independent sample t test was used. Postoperative complications between groups were compared by χ2 test. The kaplan-meier curve of 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate of the two groups was drawn for log-rank detection. P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

All patients of two groups successfully completed the operation, no conversion to laparotomy, no postoperative death in hospital, all completed follow-up. There was no significant difference in the time of operation, the amount of bleeding during operation, the time of anal exhaust, the number of lymph node dissection and the number of No.10 and No.11 lymph node dissection (P>0.05); the incidence of complications in the group of spleen preservation (7 cases, 35.0%) was significantly lower than that in the group of spleen resection (15 cases, 65.2%) (P<0.05). The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates of patients in the spleen group were 80.0%, 45.0% and 40.0%, respectively, and those in the spleen cutting group were 82.6%, 47.8% and 39.1%, respectively, with no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05); the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival rates of patients in the spleen protecting group were 75.0%, 45.0% and 35.0%, respectively, and those in the spleen cutting group were 78.3%, 43.5% and 34.8%, respectively, with no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the effect of splenectomy and spleen preservation in the radical operation of advanced proximal gastric cancer, the latter has a faster recovery and a lower incidence of complications.And they havethe same effect in lymph node dissection and the same long-term prognosis.

表1 43例近端胃癌根治术患者不同术式两组临床资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 43例近端胃癌根治术患者不同术式两组患者围术期相关指标比较(±s)
表3 43例近端胃癌根治术患者不同术式两组患者并发症发生情况(例)
图2 43例近端胃癌根治术患者不同术式两组患者OS生存曲线图
[1]
Zheng LS, Zhang C, Wang D,et al. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving hilar lymph node dissection through pre-pancreatic and retro-pancreatic approach in patients with gastric cancer[J].Cancer Cell Int,2016, 16: 52.
[2]
黄昌明,林密.腹腔镜下脾门淋巴结清扫的技术要点--CLASS-04研究设计的初衷[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018, 21(2): 143-147.
[3]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I,et al.Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2018, 68(6): 394-424.
[4]
王宁,刘硕,杨雷,等.2018全球癌症统计报告解读[J/CD].肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志,2019, 5(1): 87-97.
[5]
Japanese gastric cancer Association.Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4) [J]. Gastric cancer,2017, 20(1): 1-19.
[6]
Sano T, Sasako M, Mizusawa J, et al. Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Splenectomy in Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Carcinoma[J].Ann Surg,2017, 265(2): 277-283.
[7]
Liang Han. Progress of the diagnosis and treatment for adenocarcinoma of esophago gastric junction[J].Chin J Dig Surg,2016, 15(11): 1042-1047.
[8]
Best LM, Mughal M, Gruusamy KS.Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J].Cochrane Dalabase Syst Rev,2016, 3(3): CD011389.
[9]
Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Almhanna K,et al.Gastric Cancer,Version 3.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2016, 14(10): 1286-1312.
[10]
Chen RF, Huang CM, Chen QY,et al.Why the Proximal Splenic Artery Approach is the Ideal Approach for Laparoscopic Suprapancreatic Lymph Node Dissection in Advanced Gastric Cancer? A Large-Scale Vascular-Anatomical-Based Study[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2015, 94(18): e832.
[11]
Inokuchi M, Nakagawa M, Tanioka T,et al. Long-and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis[J].Surg Endosc,2018, 32(2): 735-742.
[12]
黄喜岷,邱建国.腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌疗效和安全性的Meta分析[J].四川医学,2016, 37(7): 737-741.
[13]
Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T,et al. A Multi-institutional, Prospective, Phase II Feasibility Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (JLSSG0901)[J].World J Surg,2015, 39(11): 2734-2741.
[14]
中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,中国研究型医院学会机器人与腹腔镜外科专业委员会.腹腔镜胃癌手术操作指南(2016版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2016, 15(9): 851-857.
[15]
张宏亨,杨智,何纪恩.贲门癌根治术中保留与切除脾脏的探讨[J].现代医学,2015, 43(1): 11-15.
[16]
陈起跃,黄泽宁,黄昌明,等."黄氏三步法"在进展期胃上部癌腹腔镜保脾脾门淋巴结清扫术中的应用[J].中华消化外科杂志,2015, 14(3): 187-191.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[6] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[9] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[10] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[11] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[12] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[13] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
[14] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[15] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要