切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 460 -463. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.05.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术对结肠癌患者胃肠功能的影响分析
燕东1, 杨熊飞1,(), 张维胜1, 杜斌斌1   
  1. 1. 730000 兰州,甘肃省人民医院结直肠肛门外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-21 出版日期:2020-10-26
  • 通信作者: 杨熊飞

Clinical analysis of gastrointestinal function of patients after laparoscopic radical surgery for right colon cancer

Dong Yan1, Xiongfei Yang1,(), Weisheng Zhang1, Binbin Du1   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Gansu Provincial People’s Hospital, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2019-06-21 Published:2020-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Xiongfei Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Xiongfei, Email:
引用本文:

燕东, 杨熊飞, 张维胜, 杜斌斌. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术对结肠癌患者胃肠功能的影响分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 460-463.

Dong Yan, Xiongfei Yang, Weisheng Zhang, Binbin Du. Clinical analysis of gastrointestinal function of patients after laparoscopic radical surgery for right colon cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 460-463.

目的

探讨腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术对患者胃肠功能的影响效果。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年12月收治的120例右半结肠癌患者临床资料,根据不同术式将其分为开腹组80例及腔镜组40例,采用SPSS22.0统计软件处理,手术相关指标、应激指标、胃肠激素、胃肠功能恢复效果等采用(±s)表示,组间比较独立t检验;并发症发生率等计数资料以χ2检验,P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组淋巴结清扫个数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腔镜组手术时间长于开腹组、术中出血量小于开腹组,胃肠功能恢复效果优于开腹组(P<0.05);术前两组患者胃肠激素、应激指标差异无统计学意义,术后两组胃肠激素较术前降低,应激指标较术前升高(P<0.05),腔镜组胃肠激素高于开腹组,应激指标低于开腹组(P<0.05)。腔镜组并发症发生率5.0%,低于开腹组26.3%,(P<0.05)。

结论

结肠癌治疗中腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术对患者胃肠功能的影响更小、应激反应更为轻微、并发症发生率更低,可作为优选治疗方案加以推广使用。

Objective

To analyze the impact of laparoscopic right colon cancer on the gastrointestinal function of patients with colon cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 120 patients with colon cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. According to surgical procedures, 80 patients underwent laparotomy were divided into the open group and forty patients received laparoscopic surgery were divided into the laparoscopic group. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS22.0 software. Measurement data such as the surgical related indexes, stress indicators, gastrointestinal hormones, and gastrointestinal function recovery effects were expressed as (±s), and were examined by using independent t test. The incidence of complications was analyzed by using χ2 test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The number of harvested lymph nodes in the laparoscopic group was comparable to that in the open group, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The operation time was longer than that in the open group, and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the open group, while the recovery of gastrointestinal function was better than that. in the open group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There was no significant differences in terms of preoperative gastrointestinal hormones and stress indexes between the two groups. Postoperative gastrointestinal hormones were lower than that before surgery, and the stress index was higher than that before surgery, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The gastrointestinal hormones in the laparoscopic group were higher than those in the open group, and the stress index was lower than that in the open group respectively (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the laparoscopic group was 5.0%, which was lower than 26.3% in the open group., with statistically significant difference (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The laparoscopic treatment of right colon cancer has less impact on gastrointestinal function, with milder stress response and lower complication rate. It could be used as a preferred treatment.

表1 120例结肠癌患者不同术式两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 120例结肠癌患者不同术式两组手术相关指标比较(±s)
表3 120例结肠癌患者不同术式两组应激指标比较(±s)
表4 120例结肠癌患者不同术式下胃肠激素比较[(±s),pg/ml]
表5 120例结肠癌患者不同术式两组胃肠功能恢复效果比较[(±s), h]
表6 120例结肠癌患者不同术式两组并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
[1]
Ohashi M,Iwama M,Ikenaga S,et al.Two Cases of Laparoscopic Resection of Colon Cancer Manifested by Liver Abscess Article in Japanese[J].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho,2017,44(12):1138-1140.
[2]
林天胜,张庆洪,蔡桦立,等.术前营养支持在腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术快速康复治疗中的临床意义[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(8):683-687.
[3]
金岩柏,樊红.腹腔镜结肠癌根治术与开腹结肠癌根治术的近、远期疗效比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):65-67.
[4]
高一飞,穆向明,蒋浩海,等.CME在腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中的应用效果及其对应激指标的影响分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(6):504-506.
[5]
王志凯,张超,白军伟,等.全腔镜下吻合新技术在腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中的应用[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(3):352-353.
[6]
涂建成,方健,黄龙,等.全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术安全性及近期疗效的比较研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(8):944-947.
[7]
刘洪.腹腔镜结肠癌切除联合完整结肠系膜切除在老年结肠癌手术中的应用[J].中国老年学杂志,2017,37(1):115-117.
[8]
刘汉东.3D与2D腹腔镜根治术治疗右半结肠癌的疗效对比[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(1):102-104.
[9]
陈柏羽.腹腔镜下完整肠系膜切除术与传统结肠癌根治术治疗中青年及老年Ⅲ期结肠癌的效果比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):68-70.
[10]
Yamanashi T,Nakamura T,Sato T,et al.Laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced T4 colon cancer: the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors[J].Surg Today,2018,48(5):534-544.
[11]
许涛,胡江涛,王平云,等.腹腔镜下中线入路右半结肠完整系膜切除在右半结肠癌患者中的手术效果分析[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(1):124-125,128.
[12]
李关宁,杨振淮.腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术应用改良中间入路和传统中间入路的近期效果比较[J].中国综合临床,2019,35(2):173-176.
[13]
秦颖,张海涛,文剑锋,等.腹腔镜与开腹治疗结肠癌的临床疗效及对机体免疫功能的影响对比[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):61-64.
[14]
向荣超.快速康复外科策略下腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术在高龄结肠癌患者中的应用[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(3):204-206.
[15]
王颢,赵权权.腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌扩大根治术关键血管评估及处理[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(3):267-271.
[1] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[11] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[12] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[13] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[14] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[15] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
阅读次数
全文


摘要