切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 310 -313. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.03.027

所属专题: 文献

论著

纳米碳示踪剂对老年甲状腺微小癌外科根治术的效果及预后的影响
龚勤俭1, 张莹华2, 杨再军1, 马洁1, 李志辉2,()   
  1. 1. 642300 四川安岳县,资阳市安岳县人民医院乳腺甲状腺外科
    2. 610061 成都,四川大学华西医院
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-30 出版日期:2020-06-26
  • 通信作者: 李志辉

Effect of nano-carbon tracer on the outcome and prognosis of surgical resection of thyroid microcarcinoma in the aged

Qinjian Gong1, Yinghua Zhang2, Zaijun Yang1, Jie Ma1, Zhihui Li2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Anyue County People’s Hospital, Anyue 642300, China
    2. West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610061, China
  • Received:2019-08-30 Published:2020-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhihui Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Zhihui, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Subsidized Project by Sichuan Health and Planning Commission(17JP111)
引用本文:

龚勤俭, 张莹华, 杨再军, 马洁, 李志辉. 纳米碳示踪剂对老年甲状腺微小癌外科根治术的效果及预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 310-313.

Qinjian Gong, Yinghua Zhang, Zaijun Yang, Jie Ma, Zhihui Li. Effect of nano-carbon tracer on the outcome and prognosis of surgical resection of thyroid microcarcinoma in the aged[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 310-313.

目的

探讨纳米碳示踪剂对老年甲状腺微小癌(PTMC)手术的疗效和预后影响。

方法

回顾性分析2013至2017年间306例老年PTMC患者资料,根据是否使用纳米碳示踪剂将患者分为常规组(150例)和示踪组(156例),应用SPSS 17.0软件完成统计分析,术中术后指标、血钙和PTH水平以(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症、术后1年复发率采用卡方检验;生存分析采用KaplanMeier法。以P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后住院时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但示踪组的淋巴结清扫数目和阳性淋巴结数目高于常规组(P<0.05);术后1 d、5 d和术后6个月示踪组PTH和血钙水平均高于常规组(P<0.05);示踪组的术后并发症肢体麻木、手足抽搐、肌肉痉挛、惊厥发作的发生率显著低于常规组(P<0.05);示踪组术后1年后复发率2.6%(4/156)明显低于常规组11.3%(17/150),差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.678, P=0.022)。

结论

纳米碳示踪剂注射对甲状旁腺具有保护作用,可有效增加淋巴结的检出率,提高对患者预后质量,具有较高的临床意义。

Objective

To investigate the effect and prognosis of using nano-carbon tracer on thyroid microcarcinoma in the aged.

Methods

Data of 306 elderly PTMC patients from 2013 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the conventional group (150 cases) and the tracing group (156 cases) based on whether carbon nanoparticles were used or not. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 software. Intraoperative and postoperative indexes, serum calcium and PTH levels were expressed as (±s), and compared with independent t test; Postoperative complications and recurrence rates 1 year after surgery were compared by chi-square. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. The difference was statistically significant with P<0.05.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume and postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05), but the number of lymph node dissection and positive lymph nodes in the tracing group were higher than those in the conventional group (P<0.05); the PTH and blood calcium levels in the tracer group were higher than those in the conventional group on the first day, the fifth day and the sixth month after operation (P<0.05). The incidence of limb numbness, extremities spasm and twitch, convulsion, muscle spasm and convulsion was significantly lower than that of the routine group (P<0.05). The recurrence rate of the tracing group was 2.6% (4/156) 1 year after operation, which was significantly lower than that of the conventional group (11.3%, 17/150). The difference was statistically significant (χ2=9.678, P=0.022).

Conclusion

nano-carbon tracer injection has protective effect on parathyroid gland, which can effectively increase the detection rate of lymph nodes, improve the prognosis quality of patients, and has high clinical significance.

表1 306例老年PTMC患者是否术中使用纳米碳示踪剂两组一般资料的比较[(±s),例]
表2 306例老年PTMC患者是否术中使用纳米碳示踪剂两组手术情况比较(±s)
表3 306例老年PTMC患者是否术中使用纳米碳示踪剂两组PTH和血钙水平的比较(±s)
表4 306例老年PTMC患者是否术中使用纳米碳示踪剂两组6个月随访结果[例(%)]
图1 306例老年PTMC患者是否术中使用纳米碳示踪剂两组术后复发曲线
[1]
田文,赵文新.腔镜分化型甲状腺癌根治术的难点和争议[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(6):451-454.
[2]
黎才惠,吴李仲,吴祥基.快速康复外科理念在老年甲状腺微小乳头状癌患者的应用[J].中国现代医学杂志,2015,25(31):102-104.
[3]
Zambeli-Ljepovi? A, Wang F, Dinan MA,et al.Extent of surgery for low-risk thyroid cancer in the elderly: Equipoise in survival but not in short-term outcomes[J].Surgery,2019,166(5):895-900.
[4]
Zhan S, Luo D, Ge W,et al.Clinicopathological predictors of occult lateral neck lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer: A meta-analysis[J].Head Neck,2019,41(7):2441-2449.
[5]
杜峻峰,安然,李世拥.分化型甲状腺癌术中纳米碳示踪对颈淋巴结清扫的指导意义[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(6):462-465.
[6]
Wang X, Lei J, Wei T,et al.Clinicopathological characteristics and recurrence risk of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in the elderly[J].Cancer Manag Res,2019,11:2371-2377.
[7]
张丙奎.甲状腺微小乳头状癌的外科治疗进展与争议[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,19(46):111.
[8]
Miyauchi A, Ito Y, Oda H.Insights into the Management of Papillary Microcarcinoma of the Thyroid[J].Thyroid,2018,28(1):23-31.
[9]
吴弢,严宏.甲状腺微小乳头状癌外科治疗进展[J].中国肿瘤外科杂志,2016,8(3):203-205.
[10]
何杰,李新营,王志明,等.多灶性甲状腺微小乳头状癌临床病理特征及预防性中央区淋巴结清扫的意义[J].中国普通外科杂志,2017,26(11):1405-1410.
[11]
刘宇飞,黄绍龙,何锋辉.纳米碳示踪剂对老年甲状腺癌术后患者颈部淋巴清扫及血钙、甲状旁腺素水平的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(11):2622-2624.
[12]
Tian W, Jiang Y, Gao B,et al.Application of nano-carbon in lymph node dissection for thyroid cancer and protection of parathyroid glands[J].Med Sci Monit,2014,20:1925-1930.
[13]
张海超,邸旭,曲鑫,等.纳米碳混悬注射液提高cN0甲状腺乳头状癌手术精准性的临床应用[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2018,24(6):547-551.
[14]
王宁,刘金彪.纳米碳示踪技术在甲状腺癌侧颈淋巴结清扫术中对血清钙、PTH水平的影响价值[J].实用癌症杂志,2019,34(6):933-936.
[15]
宋小康,李兴华,毛常青,等.纳米碳甲状旁腺负显影辨认保护技术在甲状腺癌手术中的应用[J].海南医学,2017,28(21):3548-3550.
[16]
孙荣能,赵迎春,曹晓丽.纳米碳在甲状腺微小乳头状癌手术中对甲状旁腺及喉返神经的保护作用研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(4):302-305.
[17]
Shi C, Tian B, Li S,et al.Enhanced identification and functional protective role of carbon nanoparticles on parathyroid in thyroid cancer surgery: A retrospective Chinese population study[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2016,95(46):e5148.
[18]
Mannstadt M, Bilezikian JP, Thakker RV,et al.Hypoparathyroidism[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers,2017,3:17080.
[19]
黄亮,李远平,张英毅,等.纳米碳甲状旁腺负显影辨认保护技术在甲状腺癌手术中的应用效果分析[J].中国实用医药,2018,13(25):37-38.
[1] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[2] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[3] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[4] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[5] 黄汇, 朱信强. 131I治疗45岁以下分化型甲状腺癌的疗效及影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 627-630.
[6] 樊丽超, 郭瑾瑛, 陈鑫. 野生型RET与RET/PTC融合基因检测对甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结清扫的指导意义[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 631-635.
[7] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[8] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[9] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[10] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[11] 张维志, 刘连新. 基于生物信息学分析IPO7在肝癌中的表达及意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 694-701.
[12] 叶文涛, 吴忠均, 廖锐. 癌旁组织ALOX15表达与肝癌根治性切除术后预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 708-712.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要