切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 99 -101. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.01.031

所属专题: 文献

论著

左半结肠切除一期吻合加回肠末端造瘘治疗老年梗阻性左半结肠癌的临床效果
吴康1, 崔刚2,()   
  1. 1. 725000 陕西安康市中医医院普外科
    2. 723500 陕西汉中西乡县人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-23 出版日期:2019-02-26
  • 通信作者: 崔刚

The clinical effect of loop ileostomy after left hemicolectomy combine with one-stage anastomosis for the elderly patients with obstructing left-sided colonic cancer

Kang Wu1, Gang Cui2,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Ankang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ankang Shaanxi 725000, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Xixiang People’s Hospital, Hanzhong Shaanxi 723500, China
  • Received:2018-03-23 Published:2019-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Gang Cui
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cui Gang, Email:
引用本文:

吴康, 崔刚. 左半结肠切除一期吻合加回肠末端造瘘治疗老年梗阻性左半结肠癌的临床效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 99-101.

Kang Wu, Gang Cui. The clinical effect of loop ileostomy after left hemicolectomy combine with one-stage anastomosis for the elderly patients with obstructing left-sided colonic cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 99-101.

目的

分析左半结肠切除一期吻合加回肠末端造瘘治疗老年梗阻性左半结肠癌的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2017年6月80例行左半结肠切除一期吻合术患者的临床资料,根据左半结肠切除一期吻合术后是否加行回肠末端造瘘手术分为研究组(加行回肠末端造瘘手术,39例)和对照组(未加行回肠末端造瘘手术,41例)。数据采用SPSS 20.0统计软件进行分析,患者术中术后各项指标以(±s)表示,组间比较采用独立t检验。术后并发症的发生情况采用χ2检验。以P<0.05表示差异具有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者术中出血量相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组患者手术时间较对照组显著延长(P<0.05);研究组患者术后首次排气时间、首次进食时间、引流管拔出时间以及住院时间分别为(2.5±0.9) d、 (2.5±0.7) d、 (5.7±1.5) d、 (14.3±1.8) d,较对照组均显著缩短,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组吻合口漏及总并发症发生率分别为2.6%、17.9%,显著低于对照组(17.1%、41.5%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后存活率分别为92.3%、 90.2%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

左半结肠切除一期吻合联合回肠末端造瘘,可促进梗阻性左半结肠癌患者进术后恢复,缩短住院时间,减少术后并发症,值得在临床推广使用。

Objective

To analyze the clinical effect of loop ileostomy after left hemicolectomy combine with one-stage anastomosis for the elderly patients with obstructing left-sided colonic cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 80 cases of obstructing left-sided colonic cancer patients undergoing left hemicolectomy in our hospital from January 2014 to June 2017 was made. According to whether undergoing loop ileostomy after resection, the patients were divided into the study group (with loop ileostomy, 39 cases) and control group (without loop ileostomy, 41 cases). All data were analyzed by SPSS 20.0 statistical software. The intraoperative and postoperative related indicators were presented as (±s) and were compared by t test. The incidence of postoperative complications was examined by chi square test.

Results

There was no statistical difference in the intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time in the study group was significantly longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative first feeding time, first exhaust time, drainage time, length of stay in the study group respectively were (2.5±0.9) d, (2.5±0.7) d, (5.7±1.5) d, (14.3±1.8) d, which were significantly shorter than those in the control group, all above had statistical difference (P<0.05). The rate of anastomotic leakage and totally postoperative complications in the study group was 2.6%, 17.9% respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group, 17.1%, 41.5%, all above had statistical difference (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The loop ileostomy after left hemicolectomy combine with one-stage anastomosis could promote postoperative recovery, shorten the length of stay and reduce postoperative complications, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 80例行左半结肠切除一期吻合术患者不同疗法两组患者的一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 80例行左半结肠切除一期吻合术患者不同疗法两组患者术后相关指标比较((±s), d)
表3 80例行左半结肠切除一期吻合术患者不同疗法两组患者术后并发症发生情况比较(例)
[1]
黄陈,章靖.左半结肠癌梗阻外科治疗策略演变[J/CD].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2017,6(2):94-97.
[2]
林贝安.不同手术方式治疗结肠癌合并肠梗阻效果及其预后比较[J].慢性病学杂志,2017,18(11):1249-1250,1253.
[3]
Farag S, Rehman S, Sains P, et al. Early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resections: an integrated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials[J]. Colorectal Dis,2017,19(12):1050-1057.
[4]
魏佳,张建成,任柯.预防性回肠末端造口在腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治术中的应用体会[J].医药论坛杂志,2016,37(10):41-42,46.
[5]
Fiori E, Lamazza A, Sterpetti AV. Endoscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery in Left-Sided Obstructing Colorectal Cancer: A Useful Tool in Selected Patients[J]. Dig Surg, 2017,34(6):521-522.
[6]
苗战军,韩宗明,朱鸿波,等.结直肠癌伴肠梗阻的诊断和手术治疗[J].中国肿瘤外科杂志,2015,7(2):107-109.
[7]
林庚,黄若磊,郑圣斌,等.降钙素原在早期诊断腹腔镜结直肠癌吻合口漏的价值[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016,10(2):120-122.
[8]
苗祥.一期肠切除吻合术治疗左半结肠癌并发急性肠梗阻的效果分析[J].当代医药论丛,2017,15(20):90-91.
[9]
Parodi A, De Ceglie A, De Luca L, et al. Endoscopic stenting as bridge-to-surgery (BTS) in left-sided obstructing colorectal cancer: Experience with conformable stents[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol,2016,40(5):638-644.
[10]
苗鹏,张光哲,舒强.经肛肠梗阻导管在左半结肠癌性肠梗阻患者腹腔镜手术前的应用[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2015,9(2):118-120.
[11]
Kobayashi T, Masaki T, Kogawa K, et al. Efficacy of Gum Chewing on Bowel Movement After Open Colectomy for Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2015,58(11):1058-1063.
[12]
赵海荣,魏强,鲁海洋,等.左侧结肠癌并发急性肠梗阻根治手术的方法及疗效分析[J].实用癌症杂志,2017,32(10):1722-1724.
[13]
权峰涛,张涛,蔡贵东,等.改良袢式回肠末端造瘘在左半结肠癌根治术患者中的应用研究[J].结直肠肛门外科,2017,23(6):727-730.
[14]
肖博凯,曾玉剑,施承民,等.预防性末端回肠造瘘在梗阻性左半结肠癌患者期吻合中的应用[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2017,20(3):335-337.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[2] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[6] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[7] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[8] 贺亮, 王松林, 周业江. 两种预防性回肠造口在腹腔镜ISR术治疗超低位直肠癌的效果对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-700.
[9] 郑民华, 马君俊. 不断推进中国腹腔镜直肠癌手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 473-476.
[10] 常剑, 邱峰, 毛郁琪. 摄食抑制因子-1与腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后肝转移的关系分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 502-505.
[11] 邰清亮, 施波, 侍新宇, 陈国梁, 陈俊杰, 武冠廷, 王索, 孙金兵, 顾闻, 叶建新, 何宋兵. 腹腔镜次全结肠切除术治疗顽固性慢传输型便秘的疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 478-483.
[12] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[13] 侯文运, 刘恒昌, 窦利州, 陈海鹏, 郑朝旭, 王贵齐, 王锡山. 腹部无辅助切口内镜引导下取标本的腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术(保留回盲部)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 436-440.
[14] 唐新, 刁德昌, 廖伟林, 林佳鑫, 汪佳豪, 李文娟, 谢嘉欣, 敖琳, 李洪明, 易小江, 卢新泉, 冯晓创. 保留神经的鞘外游离技术在腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中的近远期疗效分析:基于倾向性评分匹配的回顾性队列研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 372-380.
[15] 陈润芝, 杨东梅, 徐慧婷. 信迪利单抗联合索凡替尼后线治疗MSS型BRAF突变的转移性结肠癌:个案报道并文献复习[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 431-435.
阅读次数
全文


摘要