切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 80 -82. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.01.025

所属专题: 文献

论著

加速康复外科理念在全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治、胃十二指肠三角吻合术中的应用研究
韩超1, 解曙哲1,(), 连长红1, 宋应明1, 赵强1   
  1. 1. 046000 长治医学院附属和平医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-26 出版日期:2019-02-26
  • 通信作者: 解曙哲

The application study of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in the Totally Laparoscopic Radical Distal Gastrectomy with Delta-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy

Chao Han1, Shuzhe Xie1,(), Changhong Lian1, Yingming Song1, Qiang Zhao1   

  1. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, the Peace Hospital affilicated to the Changzhi Medical Colleage, Changzhi 046000, China
  • Received:2018-02-26 Published:2019-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Shuzhe Xie
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xie Shuzhe, Email:
引用本文:

韩超, 解曙哲, 连长红, 宋应明, 赵强. 加速康复外科理念在全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治、胃十二指肠三角吻合术中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 80-82.

Chao Han, Shuzhe Xie, Changhong Lian, Yingming Song, Qiang Zhao. The application study of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in the Totally Laparoscopic Radical Distal Gastrectomy with Delta-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 80-82.

目的

探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)理念应用于全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治、胃十二指肠三角吻合术的安全性与有效性。

方法

将2014年2月至2017年10月手术治疗的远端早期胃癌患者60例随机分为两组:ERAS组30例,应用ERAS理念进行围手术期处理;传统组30例,按传统方法进行围手术期处理,所有患者均接受同一组医师手术。采用SPSS17.0软件进行统计学分析,两组术中术后各项指标用(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症比较采用χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

ERAS组患者术后恢复肛门排气时间、腹腔引流管拔除时间、术后住院天数均缩短,术后进食时间明显提前,住院费用明显降低,与传统组相比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后并发症包括切口感染、吻合口漏、吻合口狭窄、胃瘫、肺部感染发生率上两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

ERAS理念应用于全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治、胃十二指肠三角吻合术患者安全、有效,明显缩短术后住院时间,且不增高术后并发症发生率,可加速患者的康复。

Objective

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in the treatment of total laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy and Delta-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy.

Methods

60 patents with distal early gastric cancer undergoing total laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy and Delta-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy in our hospital from February 2014 to October 2017 were randomly divided into two groups. 30 patients in the ERAS group were treated with the ERAS concept for perioperative management while 30 patients in the conventional group were treated with conventional management for perioperative period. All operations were performed by the same team of surgeons. SPSS17.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The intraoperative and postoperative data were expressed by ±s and compared with independent t test. Postoperative complications were compared by the Fisher’s Exact test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In the ERAS group, anus exhaust time after surgery, removal time of abdominal drainage tube and the length of hospital stay were all shortened. Moreover, the time of taking food after operation was significantly advanced and the hospitalization cost was reduced obviously in the ERAS group. There was a significant difference compared with the traditional group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between two groups in the incidence rate of postoperative complications, including incision infection, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, stomach cramps and lung infection (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The application of ERAS concept in the treatment of total laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy and Delta-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy is safe and effective. It can significantly shorten the postoperative hospital stay and does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications, which can enhance the recovery of patients.

表1 60例远端胃癌患者不同疗法两组临床资料比较(±s)
表2 60例远端胃癌患者不同疗法两组患者术后恢复情况对比(±s)
[1]
Kehlet H.Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation[J].Br J Anaesth,1997,78(5):606-617.
[2]
马路,折占飞,杨秀峰,等.快速康复外科理念在胰十二指肠切除术30例分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2015,9(4):256-258.
[3]
朱双九,郝占伟,明亮. 加速康复外科技术在腹腔镜胆囊切除围术期的应用[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(5):423-425.
[4]
冷希圣,韦军民,刘连新,等.普通外科围手术期疼痛处理专家共识[J].中华普通外科杂志,2015,30(2):166-173.
[5]
Hirano Y,Hattori M,Douden K,et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer[J].World J Gastrointest Surg,2016,8(1):95-100.
[6]
Nelson G,Altman AD,Nick A,et al.Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations--Part I[J].Gynecol Oncol,2016,140(2):313-322.
[7]
Wang YC,Szatmary P,Zhu JQ,et al.Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].World J Gastroenterol,2015,21(8):2510-2521.
[8]
Aliza A,Kwasnicki RM,Darzi A. Enhanced recovery after surgery: Current research insights and future direction[J]. World J Gastrointest Surg,2017,9(2):37-45.
[9]
Shewale JB,Correa AM,Baker CM,et al.Impact of a fast-track esophagectomy protocol on esophageal cancer patient outcomes and hospital charges[J].Ann Surg,2015,261(6):1114-1123.
[10]
白雪莉,李国刚,梁廷波.术后加速康复理念在肝胆胰外科手术应用现状及策略[J].中国实用外科杂志,2015,35(4):360-363.
[11]
黄昌明,林建贤,郑朝辉,等.三角吻合技术在全腹腔镜下胃远端癌根治术中的应用[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2013,16(2):140-143.
[12]
Feldman LS,Lee L,Fiore J Jr. What outcomes are important in the assessment of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways?[J]. Can J Anaesth,2015,62(2):120-130.
[13]
陈俊勇,程黎阳,谢正勇,等.糖预负荷对胃癌术后胰岛素抵抗的影响及其相关研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,18(12):1256-1260.
[14]
杨婵萍,李镠洋,吴小凌.保温护理干预预防直肠癌根治术患者术中低体温的研究[J].中国实用医药,2018,13(4):119-121.
[15]
彭创,易为民,谭朝霞,等.加速康复外科理念在肝胆管结石手术治疗中应用的前瞻性随机对照研究[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2016,28(3):177-180.
[16]
叶年源,汤东,王道荣.促进胃肠道手术后胃肠功能恢复临床观察[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2015,9(3):195-196.
[1] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[2] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[3] 闫笑生, 郑智, 翟育豪, 张海翘, 王鈢, 刘小野, 尹杰, 张军. Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌临床诊断、病理特征及预后分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 346-351.
[4] 王龙彪, 刘洪, 董天雄. 中心体扩增细胞占比和C反应蛋白-白蛋白比值对胃癌根治术治疗预后的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 352-356.
[5] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[6] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[7] 王鸿彬, 何晓, 吴菁宙. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中背驮式间置空肠单通道重建术在AEG手术的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 526-529.
[8] 宋钰, 赵阳, 王惠君, 廖新华. 术前BMI与可切除胃癌患者术后远期生存的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-533.
[9] 高静, 严学倩, 及月茹, 郝淼旺, 刘苍春. 胃癌患者以慢性贫血为首发表现的高危因素Logistic分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 534-537.
[10] 张彬, 贾贵清, 吴东松, 曹绿洲, 张焰凌, 黄灏, 赵高平. 早期胃癌保功能手术治疗13例病例分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 575-579.
[11] 季加孚, 苏昊, 季科. 不断推进中国腹腔镜胃癌外科手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 355-359.
[12] 韦静涛, 季鑫, 步召德, 季加孚. 早期胃癌腹腔镜功能保留手术与淋巴结清扫规范[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 360-363.
[13] 郑华蓉, 刘俊, 郑艳, 陈玉莲, 廖子敏. 加速康复外科理念下的集束化护理模式在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 643-646.
[14] 吕瑶, 张婵, 陈建华, 张鸣青. 压力控制容量保证通气模式在腹腔镜肝细胞癌切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 528-533.
[15] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
阅读次数
全文


摘要