切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 80 -82. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.01.025

所属专题: 文献

论著

加速康复外科理念在全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治、胃十二指肠三角吻合术中的应用研究
韩超1, 解曙哲1,(), 连长红1, 宋应明1, 赵强1   
  1. 1. 046000 长治医学院附属和平医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-26 出版日期:2019-02-26
  • 通信作者: 解曙哲

The application study of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in the Totally Laparoscopic Radical Distal Gastrectomy with Delta-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy

Chao Han1, Shuzhe Xie1,(), Changhong Lian1, Yingming Song1, Qiang Zhao1   

  1. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, the Peace Hospital affilicated to the Changzhi Medical Colleage, Changzhi 046000, China
  • Received:2018-02-26 Published:2019-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Shuzhe Xie
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xie Shuzhe, Email:
引用本文:

韩超, 解曙哲, 连长红, 宋应明, 赵强. 加速康复外科理念在全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治、胃十二指肠三角吻合术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 80-82.

Chao Han, Shuzhe Xie, Changhong Lian, Yingming Song, Qiang Zhao. The application study of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in the Totally Laparoscopic Radical Distal Gastrectomy with Delta-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 80-82.

目的

探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)理念应用于全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治、胃十二指肠三角吻合术的安全性与有效性。

方法

将2014年2月至2017年10月手术治疗的远端早期胃癌患者60例随机分为两组:ERAS组30例,应用ERAS理念进行围手术期处理;传统组30例,按传统方法进行围手术期处理,所有患者均接受同一组医师手术。采用SPSS17.0软件进行统计学分析,两组术中术后各项指标用(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症比较采用χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

ERAS组患者术后恢复肛门排气时间、腹腔引流管拔除时间、术后住院天数均缩短,术后进食时间明显提前,住院费用明显降低,与传统组相比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后并发症包括切口感染、吻合口漏、吻合口狭窄、胃瘫、肺部感染发生率上两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

ERAS理念应用于全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治、胃十二指肠三角吻合术患者安全、有效,明显缩短术后住院时间,且不增高术后并发症发生率,可加速患者的康复。

Objective

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in the treatment of total laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy and Delta-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy.

Methods

60 patents with distal early gastric cancer undergoing total laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy and Delta-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy in our hospital from February 2014 to October 2017 were randomly divided into two groups. 30 patients in the ERAS group were treated with the ERAS concept for perioperative management while 30 patients in the conventional group were treated with conventional management for perioperative period. All operations were performed by the same team of surgeons. SPSS17.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The intraoperative and postoperative data were expressed by ±s and compared with independent t test. Postoperative complications were compared by the Fisher’s Exact test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In the ERAS group, anus exhaust time after surgery, removal time of abdominal drainage tube and the length of hospital stay were all shortened. Moreover, the time of taking food after operation was significantly advanced and the hospitalization cost was reduced obviously in the ERAS group. There was a significant difference compared with the traditional group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between two groups in the incidence rate of postoperative complications, including incision infection, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, stomach cramps and lung infection (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The application of ERAS concept in the treatment of total laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy and Delta-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy is safe and effective. It can significantly shorten the postoperative hospital stay and does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications, which can enhance the recovery of patients.

表1 60例远端胃癌患者不同疗法两组临床资料比较(±s)
表2 60例远端胃癌患者不同疗法两组患者术后恢复情况对比(±s)
[1]
Kehlet H.Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation[J].Br J Anaesth,1997,78(5):606-617.
[2]
马路,折占飞,杨秀峰,等.快速康复外科理念在胰十二指肠切除术30例分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2015,9(4):256-258.
[3]
朱双九,郝占伟,明亮. 加速康复外科技术在腹腔镜胆囊切除围术期的应用[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(5):423-425.
[4]
冷希圣,韦军民,刘连新,等.普通外科围手术期疼痛处理专家共识[J].中华普通外科杂志,2015,30(2):166-173.
[5]
Hirano Y,Hattori M,Douden K,et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer[J].World J Gastrointest Surg,2016,8(1):95-100.
[6]
Nelson G,Altman AD,Nick A,et al.Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations--Part I[J].Gynecol Oncol,2016,140(2):313-322.
[7]
Wang YC,Szatmary P,Zhu JQ,et al.Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].World J Gastroenterol,2015,21(8):2510-2521.
[8]
Aliza A,Kwasnicki RM,Darzi A. Enhanced recovery after surgery: Current research insights and future direction[J]. World J Gastrointest Surg,2017,9(2):37-45.
[9]
Shewale JB,Correa AM,Baker CM,et al.Impact of a fast-track esophagectomy protocol on esophageal cancer patient outcomes and hospital charges[J].Ann Surg,2015,261(6):1114-1123.
[10]
白雪莉,李国刚,梁廷波.术后加速康复理念在肝胆胰外科手术应用现状及策略[J].中国实用外科杂志,2015,35(4):360-363.
[11]
黄昌明,林建贤,郑朝辉,等.三角吻合技术在全腹腔镜下胃远端癌根治术中的应用[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2013,16(2):140-143.
[12]
Feldman LS,Lee L,Fiore J Jr. What outcomes are important in the assessment of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways?[J]. Can J Anaesth,2015,62(2):120-130.
[13]
陈俊勇,程黎阳,谢正勇,等.糖预负荷对胃癌术后胰岛素抵抗的影响及其相关研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,18(12):1256-1260.
[14]
杨婵萍,李镠洋,吴小凌.保温护理干预预防直肠癌根治术患者术中低体温的研究[J].中国实用医药,2018,13(4):119-121.
[15]
彭创,易为民,谭朝霞,等.加速康复外科理念在肝胆管结石手术治疗中应用的前瞻性随机对照研究[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2016,28(3):177-180.
[16]
叶年源,汤东,王道荣.促进胃肠道手术后胃肠功能恢复临床观察[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2015,9(3):195-196.
[1] 安杰, 牛云峰, 刘伟. LINC00520 通过miR-519b-3p/HIF1A 轴促进胃癌的侵袭转移[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 430-436.
[2] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[10] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[11] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[12] 刘海旺, 施海, 尚利峰. 不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 643-646.
[13] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[14] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[15] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?