切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 478 -480. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.06.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

经腋下入路与胸乳入路行腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术的临床对比
单世胜1,(), 王新民1   
  1. 1. 712000 陕西咸阳,咸阳市中心医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-23 出版日期:2018-12-26
  • 通信作者: 单世胜

The comparative study of endoscopic unilateral thyroidectomy by the axillary approach and the chest-breast approach

Shisheng Shan1,(), Xinmin Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Xianyang Central Hospital, Shaanxi 712000, China
  • Received:2018-01-23 Published:2018-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Shisheng Shan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shan Shisheng, Email:
引用本文:

单世胜, 王新民. 经腋下入路与胸乳入路行腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 478-480.

Shisheng Shan, Xinmin Wang. The comparative study of endoscopic unilateral thyroidectomy by the axillary approach and the chest-breast approach[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(06): 478-480.

目的

探索经腋下入路与胸乳入路行腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2014年4月至2017年8月行腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术148例患者的临床资料,根据入路方式的不同,分为腋下组(83例)与胸乳组(65例)。采用Stata 14.2统计软件包进行统计分析,术中术后资料计量资料采用(±s)表示,比较采用独立t检验,并发症计数资料采用χ2检验,P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

腋下组患者手术时间低于胸乳组(P<0.05),两组患者出血量、引流量、引流管留置时间与住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腋下组患者皮下积液低于胸乳组(P<0.05),两组患者切口感染、甲状旁腺损伤、声音嘶哑的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腋下组患者术后满意度显著高于胸乳组患者(Z=6.377,P=0.000)。

结论

经腋下入路腔镜下单侧切除甲状腺住院时间短、并发症少、患者满意度高,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the clinical outcome of endoscopic unilateral thyroidectomy by the axillary approach and the chest-breast approach.

Methods

From April 2014 to August 2017, clinical data of 148 patients underwent unilateral thyroidectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into axillary group (83 cases) and chest-breast group (65 cases). Statistical analysis were performed by using Stata 14.2 software package. Measurement data such as intraoperative and postoperative indicators were expressed as mean±standard deviation and examined by using t-test. The complication rate were compared by using chi square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The operation time of the axillary group was significantly lower than that of the breast group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of the amount of bleeding, flow rate, drainage tube retention time and hospitalization time between 2 group (P>0.05). The subcutaneous hydrops in the axillary group were significantly less than those in the chest-breast group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference of incidence of incisional infection, parathyroid injury and hoarseness between 2 groups(P>0.05). The degree of postoperative satisfaction in the axillary group was significantly higher than that in the chest-breast group (Z=6.377, P=0.000).

Conclusion

Endoscopic unilateral thyroidectomy by the axillary approach has advantages including shorter of hospitalization, fewer complications and higher satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 148例腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术不同入路方式两组患者一般资料比较(±s)
表2 148例腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术不同入路方式两组患者术中术后情况比较(±s)
表3 148例腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术不同入路方式两组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 148例腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术不同入路方式两组患者术后满意度比较[例(%)]
[1]
Song CM, Yun BR, Ji YB, et al. Long-Term Voice Outcomes After Robotic Thyroidectomy[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40(1):110-116.
[2]
Lee DY, Lee KJ, Han WG, et al. Comparison of transaxillary approach, retroauricular approach, and conventional open hemithyroidectomy: A prospective study at single institution[J]. Surgery, 2016, 159(2):524-531.
[3]
Somashekhar SP, Ashwin KR. Robot-assisted thyroidectomy using a gasless, transaxillary approach for the management of thyroid lesions: Indian experience[J]. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery, 2017, 13(4):280-285.
[4]
Byeon HK, Holsinger FC, Tufano RP, et al. Endoscopic retroauricular thyroidectomy: preliminary results[J]. Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques, 2016, 30(1):355-365.
[5]
Park JH, Lee J, Hakim NA, et al. Robotic thyroidectomy learning curve for beginning surgeons with little or no experience of endoscopic surgery[J]. Head Neck, 2015, 37(12):1705-1711.
[6]
Materazzi G, Fregoli L, Papini P, et al. Robot-Assisted Transaxillary Thyroidectomy (RATT): A Series Appraisal of More than 250 Cases from Europe[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2018, 42(4):1018-1023.
[7]
傅锦波,罗晔哲,洪晓泉,等. 经腋窝入路与经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺切除术的对比研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2017, 17(8):688-690.
[8]
翁原驰,吴志翀,陈曦,等. 机器人经双侧腋窝和乳晕入路甲状腺手术的初步经验(附40例报告)[J]. 外科理论与实践,2016,21(6):517-520.
[9]
Kim SK, Woo JW, Park I, et al. Propensity score-matched analysis of robotic versus endoscopic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2017, 402(2):243-250.
[10]
Choi IJ, Kim NY, Kim KH, et al. Comparative Study of Unilateral Axillo-Breast Approach with Gas Insufflation Versus Gasless Transaxillary Approach for Endoscopic Thyroidectomy in a Single Institute[J]. 2016, 59(12):848-855.
[11]
罗勋鹏,刘新杰,许楠. 内镜下经腋窝单孔和双乳晕同侧腋窝路径甲状腺手术效果分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016, 10(2):156-158.
[12]
Cho J, Lee D, Baek J, et al. Single-incision endoscopic thyroidectomy by the axillary approach with gas inflation for the benign thyroid tumor: retrospective analysis for a single surgeon’s experience[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31(1):437-444.
[13]
张多钧,任志忠,范新明,等. 经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺良性病变的临床应用[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2016,21(4):277-280.
[14]
Kwon H, Yi JW, Song RY, et al. Comparison of Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach Robotic Thyroidectomy with Open Thyroidectomy for Graves’ Disease[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40(3):498-504.
[15]
Song CM, Yun BR, Ji YB, et al. Long-Term Voice Outcomes After Robotic Thyroidectomy[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40(1):110-116.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 陈镁仪, 李伊尧, 张梦圆, 许杰, 马若凡, 李登, 顾菁. 图示化自主髋关节功能评分系统的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 320-328.
[3] 邵小丽, 林燕, 张玲玲, 韩亚琴. 超声引导下子宫肌瘤注射聚桂醇硬化术联合术后米非司酮治疗临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 353-360.
[4] 苏永涛, 王春雷, 徐广琪, 关中正, 焦伟, 隋颖. 胫骨骨膜牵张术联合富血小板血浆对治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 238-244.
[5] 王伟伟, 费建平, 王璋瑜. 不同手术空间建立方法的经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺术对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 84-87.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[8] 何羽. 腔镜微创手术治疗分化型甲状腺癌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 456-458.
[9] 宋红霞, 吴玩呈. 内镜下甲状腺手术切口入路发展的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 470-472.
[10] 高一飞, 刘根祥, 孙长华, 周广军. “RLN三角”在经腋窝入路腔镜甲状腺切除术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 307-310.
[11] 游涛建, 任林, 马宇. cT1-2N0期PTMC经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺切除术后引流与否的可行性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 311-314.
[12] 鲁鑫, 杨琴, 许佳怡. 不同术式治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸疗效及对免疫功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 180-183.
[13] 刘晓菊, 姚芮, 杜镇鸿, 李文忠. 经胸壁入路与低位小切口在甲状腺良性肿瘤切除术中的疗效比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 204-207.
[14] 方开萱, 翟亚奇, 张贯军, 陈升鑫, 陈德鑫, 刘文静, 梁雅文, 李明阳. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胰腺分裂症的安全性与远期疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 284-289.
[15] 许琳. 甲状腺激素及相关疾病与性激素关系的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 315-318.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?