切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 478 -480. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.06.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

经腋下入路与胸乳入路行腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术的临床对比
单世胜1,(), 王新民1   
  1. 1. 712000 陕西咸阳,咸阳市中心医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-23 出版日期:2018-12-26
  • 通信作者: 单世胜

The comparative study of endoscopic unilateral thyroidectomy by the axillary approach and the chest-breast approach

Shisheng Shan1,(), Xinmin Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Xianyang Central Hospital, Shaanxi 712000, China
  • Received:2018-01-23 Published:2018-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Shisheng Shan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shan Shisheng, Email:
引用本文:

单世胜, 王新民. 经腋下入路与胸乳入路行腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术的临床对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 478-480.

Shisheng Shan, Xinmin Wang. The comparative study of endoscopic unilateral thyroidectomy by the axillary approach and the chest-breast approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(06): 478-480.

目的

探索经腋下入路与胸乳入路行腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2014年4月至2017年8月行腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术148例患者的临床资料,根据入路方式的不同,分为腋下组(83例)与胸乳组(65例)。采用Stata 14.2统计软件包进行统计分析,术中术后资料计量资料采用(±s)表示,比较采用独立t检验,并发症计数资料采用χ2检验,P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

腋下组患者手术时间低于胸乳组(P<0.05),两组患者出血量、引流量、引流管留置时间与住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腋下组患者皮下积液低于胸乳组(P<0.05),两组患者切口感染、甲状旁腺损伤、声音嘶哑的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腋下组患者术后满意度显著高于胸乳组患者(Z=6.377,P=0.000)。

结论

经腋下入路腔镜下单侧切除甲状腺住院时间短、并发症少、患者满意度高,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the clinical outcome of endoscopic unilateral thyroidectomy by the axillary approach and the chest-breast approach.

Methods

From April 2014 to August 2017, clinical data of 148 patients underwent unilateral thyroidectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into axillary group (83 cases) and chest-breast group (65 cases). Statistical analysis were performed by using Stata 14.2 software package. Measurement data such as intraoperative and postoperative indicators were expressed as mean±standard deviation and examined by using t-test. The complication rate were compared by using chi square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The operation time of the axillary group was significantly lower than that of the breast group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of the amount of bleeding, flow rate, drainage tube retention time and hospitalization time between 2 group (P>0.05). The subcutaneous hydrops in the axillary group were significantly less than those in the chest-breast group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference of incidence of incisional infection, parathyroid injury and hoarseness between 2 groups(P>0.05). The degree of postoperative satisfaction in the axillary group was significantly higher than that in the chest-breast group (Z=6.377, P=0.000).

Conclusion

Endoscopic unilateral thyroidectomy by the axillary approach has advantages including shorter of hospitalization, fewer complications and higher satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 148例腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术不同入路方式两组患者一般资料比较(±s)
表2 148例腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术不同入路方式两组患者术中术后情况比较(±s)
表3 148例腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术不同入路方式两组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 148例腔镜下单侧甲状腺切除术不同入路方式两组患者术后满意度比较[例(%)]
[1]
Song CM, Yun BR, Ji YB, et al. Long-Term Voice Outcomes After Robotic Thyroidectomy[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40(1):110-116.
[2]
Lee DY, Lee KJ, Han WG, et al. Comparison of transaxillary approach, retroauricular approach, and conventional open hemithyroidectomy: A prospective study at single institution[J]. Surgery, 2016, 159(2):524-531.
[3]
Somashekhar SP, Ashwin KR. Robot-assisted thyroidectomy using a gasless, transaxillary approach for the management of thyroid lesions: Indian experience[J]. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery, 2017, 13(4):280-285.
[4]
Byeon HK, Holsinger FC, Tufano RP, et al. Endoscopic retroauricular thyroidectomy: preliminary results[J]. Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques, 2016, 30(1):355-365.
[5]
Park JH, Lee J, Hakim NA, et al. Robotic thyroidectomy learning curve for beginning surgeons with little or no experience of endoscopic surgery[J]. Head Neck, 2015, 37(12):1705-1711.
[6]
Materazzi G, Fregoli L, Papini P, et al. Robot-Assisted Transaxillary Thyroidectomy (RATT): A Series Appraisal of More than 250 Cases from Europe[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2018, 42(4):1018-1023.
[7]
傅锦波,罗晔哲,洪晓泉,等. 经腋窝入路与经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺切除术的对比研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2017, 17(8):688-690.
[8]
翁原驰,吴志翀,陈曦,等. 机器人经双侧腋窝和乳晕入路甲状腺手术的初步经验(附40例报告)[J]. 外科理论与实践,2016,21(6):517-520.
[9]
Kim SK, Woo JW, Park I, et al. Propensity score-matched analysis of robotic versus endoscopic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2017, 402(2):243-250.
[10]
Choi IJ, Kim NY, Kim KH, et al. Comparative Study of Unilateral Axillo-Breast Approach with Gas Insufflation Versus Gasless Transaxillary Approach for Endoscopic Thyroidectomy in a Single Institute[J]. 2016, 59(12):848-855.
[11]
罗勋鹏,刘新杰,许楠. 内镜下经腋窝单孔和双乳晕同侧腋窝路径甲状腺手术效果分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016, 10(2):156-158.
[12]
Cho J, Lee D, Baek J, et al. Single-incision endoscopic thyroidectomy by the axillary approach with gas inflation for the benign thyroid tumor: retrospective analysis for a single surgeon’s experience[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31(1):437-444.
[13]
张多钧,任志忠,范新明,等. 经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺良性病变的临床应用[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2016,21(4):277-280.
[14]
Kwon H, Yi JW, Song RY, et al. Comparison of Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach Robotic Thyroidectomy with Open Thyroidectomy for Graves’ Disease[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40(3):498-504.
[15]
Song CM, Yun BR, Ji YB, et al. Long-Term Voice Outcomes After Robotic Thyroidectomy[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40(1):110-116.
[1] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[2] 陈航, 闵翔. 日间甲状腺切除术后出血的12例临床分析及应对措施[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 600-602.
[3] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[4] 黄崇植, 肖映胜, 杨熙鸿, 林炘. 甲状腺下动脉的上行分支在甲状腺术中定位喉返神经的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 607-610.
[5] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[6] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[7] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[8] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[9] 范伟强, 林师佈, 孙传伟, 宋奇锋, 李望, 符誉, 陈艾. 不同切除范围的Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ、Ⅳ型腹腔镜肝门部胆管癌手术临床对比分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 423-426.
[10] 王新团, 李博, 李栋, 马宁, 李宝平, 刘淑萍. Laennec膜入路与Glisson鞘入路在腹腔镜解剖性肝切除中的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 418-422.
[11] 张杰, 吕远, 孙亮, 苏惠, 谢惠, 袁强, 王昕, 杜峻峰, 金鹏, 陈纲. 腹腔镜-胃镜联合手术处理困难部位胃间质瘤的临床分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 284-286.
[12] 刘烺飚, 牛磊, 蔡军. λ型食管空肠吻合在全腹腔镜下全胃切除术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 287-291.
[13] 柴吉鑫, 张雪, 何时知, 齐艳涛, 王婧婧, 敖亚洲, 陈泳. 不同穿刺方法对甲状腺结节细胞学检查的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 315-318.
[14] 陈大六, 宋勇罡, 赵海剑, 张晓雨. 三种不同手术入路的腔镜甲状腺癌根治术临床效果评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 188-191.
[15] 关善斌, 黄天斌, 王昌泉, 陆柳汕. 经口腔前庭入路行甲状腺癌手术的临床效果观察研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 192-196.
阅读次数
全文


摘要